BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ HASTA EĞİTİMİ

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 3, 13 - 18, 29.12.2017

Zuhal Erdoğan , Hülya Bulut

Abstract

Son
yıllarda yaşanan teknolojik gelişmeler sonucunda bilgisayar ve internet hasta
eğitiminde yaygın olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bilgisayar destekli hasta
eğitiminin birçok avantajı olmasına rağmen beraberinde getirdiği önemli
dezavantajları da bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle hemşirelerin en önemli rollerinden
birisi olan eğitici rolünü yerine getirirken bilgisayar ve internet kullanan
bireyleri doğru bilgi kaynaklarına yönlendirebilmesi ve bu konuda danışmanlık
işlevlerini yerine getirebilmesi son derece önemlidir.

Keywords

Hastaların eğitimi, bilgisayar destekli eğitim, eğitim teknolojisi, hemşirelik bakımı

References

• 1. Şenyuva E, Taşocak G. Hemşirelerin hasta eğitimi etkinlikleri ve hasta eğitimi süreci. İ.Ü.F.N. Hem. Derg. 2007; 15(59): 100-106. 2. Boughton M, Halliday L. Home alone: patient and carer uncertainty surrounding discharge with continuing clinical care needs. Contemp Nurse. 2009; 33(1):30-40. 3. Demir Y, Gözüm S. Sağlık eğitiminde yeni yönelimler; web destekli sağlık eğitimi. DEUHYO ED. 2011; 4(4): 196-203. 4. Malik NA, Zhang J, Lam OLT, Jin L, McGrath C. Effectiveness of computer- aided learning in oral health among patients and caregivers: a systematic review. JAMIA. 2017; 24(1): 209-217. 5. García-Casal JA, Loizeau A, Csipke E, Franco-Martín M, Perea-Bartolomé MV, Orrell M. Computer -based cognitive interventions for people living with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health. 2017; 21(5): 454-467. 6. Eurostat Statistics Explained. Internet access and use statistics households and individuals. Date: 21.10.2017. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Internet_access_and_use_statistics_-_households_and_individuals. 7. TUİK. Hanehalkı Bilişim Teknolojileri Kullanım Araştırması, 2016. Erişim: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=21779 ( Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2017). 8. Özer Ö, Şantaş F, Budak F. Sağlık web sitelerinin kullanım düzeylerinin incelenmesi: örnek bir uygulama. e-GİFDER. 2012; 1 (4): 137-149. 9. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013. Date: 21.11.2017. Available: http://www.pewinternet. org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. 10. Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE, Dumitru RC, Pudule I, Santana S, ve ark. European citizens' use of E-health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health. 2007; 7:53. 11. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8(2): e10. 12. McIntyre R, Craig A. A literature review of patient education: Is it time to move forward? Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2015; 46(3): S75-S85. 13. Fisher LA, Johnson TS, Porter D, Bleich HL, Slack WV. Collection of a clean voided urine specimen: a comparison among spoken, written, and computer-based instructions. Am J Public Health. 1977;67(7):640–4. 14. Wetstone SL, Sheehan TJ, Votaw RG, Peterson MG, Rothfield N. Evaluation of a computer based education lesson for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 1985;12(5): 907-12. 15. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, Slaughter R, McGhee EM. The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2004; Nov 10;6(4):e40. 16. Yeh ML, Chen HH, Liu PH. Effects of multimedia with printed nursing guide in education on self-efficacy and functional activity and hospitalization in patients with hip replacement. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 57(2) : 217-224. 17. Keulers B, Welters C, Spauwen, P, Houpt P. Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based patient education? a randomised trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 67(1-2): 176-182. 18. Heikkinen K, Leino-Kilpi H, Taina N, Anne K, Sanna S. A comparison of two educational interventions for the cognitive empowerment of ambulatory orthopaedic surgery patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 73(2): 272–279. 19. Lo SF, Hayter M, Hsu M, Lin SE, Lin SI. The effectiveness of multimedia learning education programs on knowledge, anxiety and pressure garment compliance in patients undergoing burns rehabilitation in Taiwan: an experimental study. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19(1-2): 129-137. 20. Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, Emmons KM, Gillman M W. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010; 18(2): 308-313. 21. Ryhänen AM, Rankinen S, Siekkinen M, Saarinen M, Korvenranta H, Leino- Kilpi H. The impact of an empowering internet-based breast cancer patient pathway program on breast cancer patients’ clinical outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2013; 22(7-8): 1016-1025. 22. Salonen A, Ryhänen AM, Leino-Kilpi H. Educational benefits of internet and computer-based programmes for prostate cancer patients: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 94(1); 10–19. 23. Donovan HS, Ward SE, Sereika SM, Knapp JE, Sherwood PR, Bender CM et al. Web-based symptom management for women with recurrent ovarian cancer: a pilot randomized controlled trial of the wrıte symptoms ıntervention. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014; 47(2): 218-230. 24. Yenal K, Sevil Ü. The effects of web-based childbirth education program on activities of daily living of pregnant women. HealthMED. 2012; 6(3):930-938. 25. Avdal EU, Kizilci S, Demirel N. The effect of web-based diabetes education on diabetes care results: a randomized control study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29(2): 101-106. 26. Çapık C, Gözüm S. The effect of web-assisted education and reminders on health belief, level of knowledge and early diagnosis behaviors regarding prostate cancer screening. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2012; 16(1): 71-77. 27. Yardımcı T, Mert H. Web-based ıntervention to improve implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients’ shock-related anxiety and quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Nursing Research.2017; 14:1-15. 28. Abed MA, Himmel W, Vormfelde,S, Koschack. J. Video-assisted patient education to modify behavior: a systematic review. Patient Educ and Couns. 2014; 97(1): 16-22. 29. Yıldız T. Cerrahi hasta eğitiminde kullanılan güncel yöntemler: hastalık merkezli değil, hasta merkezli eğitim. MÜSBED. 2015; 5(2): 129-133. 30. Zülfikar H. Hastaların internet kullanımı ve elektronik ortamdaki sağlık bilgilerine erişim davranışları. F.N. Hem. Derg. 2014; 22(1): 46-52. 31. Tekin A, Kaya E, Demirel M, Yazıcı S. Güçlendirme bağlamında internetin hasta-hekim ilişkilerine etkisi. Selçuk İletişim. 2009; 6(1): 23-36 32. Ahmad F, Hudak PL, Bercovitz K, Hollenberg E, Levinson W. Are physicians ready for patients with internet-based health information?. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2006; 8(3): e22. 33. Joury A, Joraid A, Alqahtami F, Alghamdi A, Batwa A, Pines JM. The variation in quality and content of patient‐focused health information on the Internet for otitis media. Child Care Health Dev. Wiley Online Library 2017; 1-6. 34. Cook DA. Web- based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clinical Medicine. 2007; 7(1): 37-42. 35. McKimm J, Jollie C, Cantiilon P. ABC of learning and teaching web based learning. BMJ, 2003; 326; 870-873. 36. Eysenbasch G. The impact of the internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(6): 356-371.