REVIEWING THE BRICKS USED IN THE TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURE WITH THE SHAPE GRAMMAR METHOD

Year 2016, Volume: 29 Issue: 4, 741 - 749, 19.12.2016

Arzu Özen Yavuz , Özlem Sağıroğlu

Abstract

The tradition; which started with leaving the brick surfaces out; later enabled the use of bricks on the facades as ornamental element by vitrifying the surfaces of the bricks. The first examples of its use are possible to be seen on Early Period of Beyliks and Anatolian Seljukians. While the first examples, which were produced by leaving the brick out, were brick weaves; the examples seen on the later periods were brick coatings. These different weave methods caused the creation of different ornamental arrangements. One of the methods; which was used to specify the rules of the weaves, which were created by depending on a certain rule strings, is shape grammar method. Within this study; it is also aimed to analyze the brick weaves, which re-defined the facade arrangement; with form grammar method. Hence; it was aimed to define the brick facade arrangements which are specific for Anatolia.

 

Keywords

Keywords: Terracotta, Brick, Weave - Pattern, Shape Grammar

References

• Aydın, D., “Bina Bezeme Malzemelerinin Uygulamadaki Konumu ve Yitirilen Görsel Kalite”, 2. Ulusal Yapı Malzemesi Kongresi ve Sergisi Bildiriler kitabı, YapKat, İstanbul, 5, (2004).
• Lloyd, S., Building in Brick and Stone, History Of Tecnology, Oxford, 456, (1956).
• İzgi, U., Mimarlıkta Süreç, Kavramlar, İlişkiler, YEM Yayınları, İstanbul, 104,105, 182, (1999).
• Kuban, D., Mimarlık Kavramları, YEM Yayınları, İstanbul, 36, (2010).
• Bakırer, Ö., Selçuklu Öncesi ve Selçuklu Dönemi Anadolu Mimarisinde Tuğla Kullanımı (Cilt 1-2), ODTÜ yayınları, Ankara, 1, 3,5, 9, 21, 24, 35, 36, 53, 63, 117, 148, 159, (1981).
• Cezar, M., Anadolu Öncesi Türklerde Şehir ve Mimarlık, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul, 16, 1977
• Tayla, H., Geleneksel Türk Mimarisinde Yapı Sistem Ve Elemanları (Cilt1-2), Türkiye Anıt Çevre Turizm Değerlerini Koruma Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul, 507, (2007).
• Bakırer, Ö., “A Study on The Use of Brickbonds in Anatolian Seljuk Architectyure”, M.E.T.U. Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, Fall 1980, 20(2), 148, (1980).
• Stiny G., Mitchell W. J., “The Palladian Grammar”, Environment and Planning B, 5(1), 5 – 18, (1978).
• Köning H., Eizenberg J., “The Language of the Prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright's Prairie Houses”, Environment and Planning B, 8(3), 295-323, (1981).
• Flemming, U., “More Than The Sum of Its Parts: The Grammar of Queen Anne Houses”, Environment and Planning B, 14, 323-350, (1987).
• Duarte, J. P., “Towards the Mass Customization of Housing: The Grammar of Siza's Houses at Malagueira”, Environment and Planning B, 32, 347 – 380, (2005).
• Çağdaş, G., “A Shape Grammar: The Language of Traditional Turkish Houses”, Environment and Planning B, 5, 443-464, (1996).
• Şener, S. M., “A Shape Grammar Algorithm and Educational Software to Analize Classic Ottoman Mosques”, A|Z Journal of Faculty of Architecture, Spring 5(1), 12-30, (2009).
• Ulu, E., “İslami Geometrik Örüntü Türetimi Amaçlı Bir Biçim Grameri Modeli”, Ms.C. Thesis, İTÜ, Instute of Natural and Applied Science, İstanbul, 5-10, (2009).
• Kaplan, C. S., “Computer Generated Islamic Star Patterns”, Bridges 2000 Proceedings, (2000). (http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/)
• Grünbaum, B., Shephard G. C., “Interlace patterns in Islamic and Moorish Art”, Leonardo, 25, 331–339, (1992).
• Cenani, Ş. ve Çağdaş, G., “A Shape Grammar Study: Form Generation with Geometric Islamic Patterns”, 10th Generative Art Conference GA, (2007).
• Çolakoğlu, B., Yazar T., Uysal, S., “Educational Experiment on Generative Tool Development In Architecture PatGen: Islamic Star Pattern Generator”, Architecture in Computro 26th eCAADe Conference Proceedings, 685-691, (2008).
• Özen Yavuz, A., “Çağdaş Konut Örneklerinin Morfolojik Analizi ve İşlemsel Tasarım Ortamında Üretimine Yönelik Kavramsal ve Deneysel Bir Model Önerisi”, Ph. D. Thesis, Gazi University, Instute of Natural and Applied Science, Ankara, (2011).