The Effect of Trunk and Hip Anthropometric Measurements on Endurance in Young Healthy Individuals

Year 2023, Volume: 12 Issue: 4, 1959 - 1966, 26.12.2023

Rabia Koca , Müşerref Ebru Şen

https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1275487

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This research was conducted to determine the relationship between physical characteristics and anthropometric measurements and endurance in healthy young individuals. The population of the study consisted of a total of 130 healthy individuals, 50 male and 80 female, aged between 19 and 40, who did not have any systemic disease and did not have a problem that would prevent them from completing muscle endurance tests. The data of the research; sociodemographic characteristics, physical characteristics, anthropometric measurements and trunk endurance tests created by the researchers by examining the literature. Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, Spearman Correlation analysis and Bonferroni correction for multiple tests were used in the statistical analysis of the data. In this study, the circumference measurement values outside the hip were found to be significantly higher in males (p<0.05), and the trunk endurance test times of males were also significantly longer (p<0.05). Both the circumference measurement values and the trunk endurance test results were found to be significantly different in the 3 groups divided as underweight, normal and overweight+obese according to body mass index (p<0.05). All trunk endurance tests of the group with normal body mass index were found to be significantly higher than those of the lean group (p<0.01). A positive correlation was found between age, side bridging and prone bridging endurance test results, as well as height and weight and whole trunk endurance test results (p<0.05). Except for shoulder circumference, no correlation was found between other circumference measurements and trunk endurance. It was determined that as the shoulder circumference increased, the whole trunk endurance values increased positively.

Keywords

Anthropometric Measurement, Endurance, Body Mass Index

Sağlıklı Genç Bireylerde Gövde ve Kalça Antropometrik Ölçümlerinin Endurans Üzerine Etkisi

Abstract

Bu araştırma sağlıklı genç bireylerde fiziksel özelliklerin ve antropometrik ölçümlerin endurans ile ilişkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini 19-40 yaş arası herhangi sistemik bir rahatsızlığı ve kas endurans testlerini tamamlamayı engelleyecek bir problemi olmayan, gönüllü 50 erkek 80 kadın toplam 130 sağlıklı birey oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verilerini; araştırmacılar tarafından literatür incelenerek oluşturulan sosyodemografik özellikler, fiziksel özellikler, antropometrik ölçümler ve gövde endurans testleri oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin istatistiksel analizinde Mann Whitney U, Kruskal Wallis, Spearman Korelasyon analizi ve çoklu testler için Bonferroni düzeltmesi kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmada kalça dışında yapılan çevre ölçüm değerleri erkeklerde anlamlı olarak fazla bulunmuştur (p<0,05) ek olarak erkeklerin gövde endurans test süreleri de anlamlı olarak fazlaydı (p<0,05). Vücut kitle indeksine göre zayıf, normal ve kilolu+obez şeklinde ayrılan 3 grupta hem çevre ölçüm değerleri hem de gövde endurans test sonuçları anlamlı olarak farklı bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Normal vücut kitle indeksine sahip olan grubun gövde endurans testlerinin tümü, zayıf olan gruba göre anlamlı olarak fazla olduğu saptanmıştır (p<0,01). Yaş ile yan köprü kurma ve yüzüstü köprü kurma endurans test sonuçları arasında ayrıca boy ve kilo ile bütün gövde endurans test sonuçları arasında pozitif ilişki bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Omuz çevresi dışında diğer çevre ölçümleri ile gövde enduransı arasında korelasyon bulunamamıştır. Omuz çevre ölçüsü arttıkça bütün gövde endurans değerlerinin pozitif yönde arttığı saptanmıştır.

Keywords

Antropometrik Ölçüm, Endurans, Vücut Kitle İndeksi

References

• 1. Keys, A, Fidanza, F, Karvonen, M.J, Kimura, N. and Taylor, H.L. (1972). “Indices of Relative Weight and Obesity”. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 25 (6), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6
• 2. Status, W.P. (1995). “The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry”. WHO Technical Report Series, 854 (9).
• 3. World Health Organization. (2014). “BMI Classification”. http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp? introPage=intro_3.html. (Erişim tarihi: 01 Şubat 2023).
• 4. Madden, A.M. and Smith, S. (2016). “Body Composition and Morphological Assessment of Nutritional Status in Adults: A Review of Anthropometric Variables”. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 29 (1), 7-25.
• 5. Herron, R. (2000). “Anthropometry: Definition, Uses and Methods of Measurement”. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors-3 Volume Set, 879.
• 6. Bibiloni, M.D.M, Karam, J, Bouzas, C, Aparicio-Ugarriza, R, Pedrero-Chamizo, R, Sureda, A. ... and Tur, J.A. (2018). “Association Between Physical Condition and Body Composition, Nutrient Intake, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Lifestyle Habits in Older Spanish Adults”. Nutrients, 10 (11), 1608.
• 7. Tur, J.A. and Bibiloni, M.D.M. (2019). “Anthropometry, Body Composition and Resting Energy Expenditure in Human”. Nutrients, 11 (8), 1891.
• 8. Elibol, Z. (2000). “Elit Ritmik Cimnastikcilerin Bazı Fiziksel Uygunluk ve Antropometrik Özelliklerin Değerlendirilmesi”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• 9. Werner, S. (1995). “An Evaluation of Knee Extensor and Knee Flexor Torques and Emgs in Patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Comparison with Matched Controls”. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 3, 89-94.
• 10. Faigenbaum, A.D, Westcott, W.L, Loud, R.L. and Long, C. (1999). “The Effects of Different Resistance Training Protocols on Muscular Strength and Endurance Development in Children”. Pediatrics, 104 (1), E5-E5.
• 11. Ayan, V, Kaya, M. ve Erol, A.E. (2011). “Erkek Çocuklarının Futbol Branşı için Somatotip ve Performans Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi”. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 5 (3): 27-31
• 12. Taylor, A.E, Ebrahim, S, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Martin, R.M, Whincup, P.H, Yarnell, J.W. ... and Lawlor, D.A. (2010). “Comparison of the Associations of Body Mass İndex and Measures of Central Adiposity and Fat Mass with Coronary Heart Disease, Diabetes, and All-Cause Mortality: A Study Using Data From 4 UK Cohorts”. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 91 (3), 547-556.
• 13. Doymaz, F. (2005). “Sağlıklı Bireylerde Fiziksel Özelliklerin Gövde ve Alt Ekstremite Kas Enduransına Etkilerinin İncelenmesi”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı, Denizli.
• 14. Waldhelm, A. and Li, L. (2012). “Endurance Tests are the Most Reliable Core Stability Related Measurements”. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 1 (2), 121-128.
• 15. Yüksel, F, Güzel, N.A, Taşpınar, B. and Balaban, A. (2020). “Relationship Between Trunk Muscle Endurance, Pulmonary Function, and Respiratory Muscle Strength in Healthy İndividuals”. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 31 (3), 255-262.
• 16. Bojanic, D, Ljubojevic, M, Krivokapic, D. and Gontarev, S. (2020). “Waist Circumference, Waist-to-Hip Ratio, and Waist-to-Height Ratio Reference Percentiles for Abdominal Obesity Among Macedonian Adolescents”. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 37 (4), 78-793.
• 17. Bacopoulou, F, Efthymiou, V, Landis, G, Rentoumis, A. and Chrousos, G.P. (2015). “Waist Circumference, Waist-to-Hip Ratio and Waist-to-Height Ratio Reference Percentiles for Abdominal Obesity Among Greek Adolescents”. BMC Pediatrics, 15 (1), 1-9.
• 18. Jalayondeja, W. and Kraingchieocharn, S. (2015). “Trunk Extensor, Flexor and Lateral Flexor Endurance Time in Sedentary Workers Aged 20-49 Years”. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, Chotmaihet Thangphaet, 98, S23-8.
• 19. Hanafy, A.F. (2018). “Gender, Trunk Muscle Endurance and Static Balance in Young Adults”. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research, 6 (2), 254-261.
• 20. Zaryski, C. and Smith, D.J. (2005). “Training Principles and İssues for Ultra-Endurance Athletes”. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 4 (3), 165-170.
• 21. Gabbett, T. and Georgieff, B. (2007). “Physiological and Anthropometric Characteristics of Australian Junior National, State, and Novice Volleyball Players”. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 21 (3), 902-908.
• 22. Bohannon, R.W, Brennan, P.J, Pescatello, L.S, Marschke, L, Hasson, S. and Murphy, M. (2005). “Adiposity of Elderly Women and Its Relationship with Self-Reported and Observed Physical Performance”. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 30 (1), 10-13.
• 23. Abaraogu, U.O. and Ugwa, W.O. (2016). “Selected Anthropometrics, Spinal Posture, and Trunk Muscle Endurance as Correlated Factors of Static Balance Among Adolescent and Young Adult Males”. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil, 62, 9-16.
• 24. Sunnerhagen, K.S, Hedberg, M, Henning, G.B, Cider, A. and Svantesson, U. (2000). “Muscle Performance in an Urban Population Sample of 40-to 79-Year-Old Men and Women”. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 32 (4), 159-167.
• 25. Knechtle B. (2014). “Relationship of Anthropometric and Training Characteristics with Race Performance in Endurance and Ultra-Endurance Athletes”. Asian Journal of Sports Medicine, 5 (2), 73–90.
• 26. Knechtle, B, Knechtle, P, Schulze, I. and Kohler, G. (2008). “Upper Arm Circumference is Associated with Race Performance in Ultra-Endurance Runners”. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42 (4), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2007.038570