Abstract
This article thoroughly examines the views of American philosopher John Searle on the concepts of intentionality and intention, which are among the most fundamental issues in the history of human thought. The concept of intention, as a fundamental concept for understanding the human mind and behavior, also facilitates the comprehension of language, social structure, and the concrete and abstract realities of this structure. Understanding this concept will offer valuable contributions to future research, especially in the field of communication sociology, for determining the boundaries of collective actions and analyzing social cooperation.
Keywords
References
- Anık, C. (2014). İletişim sosyolojisi: kuramsal temeller. Derin Yayınları.
- Krueger, J. (2018). “Intentionality.” - Giovanni Stanghellini vd. (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology, Oxford University Press.
- Lijun, H. (2019). “Revisit Euphemisms from the Perspective of Intentional ity”. Forum for Linguistic Studies 1 (1).
- Pierre J. (2019). “Intentionality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Erişim adresi: https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/win2019/entries/intentionality/ Erişim Tarihi: 21.10.2019.
- Searle, J. R. (1983) Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Searle, J. R. (1990). “Collective intentions and actions.” Cohen P., Morgan J. Pollack M. (Ed.) Intentions in communication, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Searle, J. R. (1998) Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books.
- Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Tuomela, R. Ve Miller, K. (1988) ‘We-Intentions’. Philosophical Studies, 53, 115–37.
Abstract
Bu makale insanlığın düşün tarihinin en temel sorunsallarından biri olan intentionality-mütemayil durum- ve intention -temayül- kavramları üzerine Amerikalı filozof John Searle’nin görüşlerini detaylı olarak incelemektedir. İnsan zihni ve davranışlarının anlaşılabilmesi için temel arz eden görüşlerden biri olan temayül kavramı, aynı zamanda dilin, toplumsal yapının ve bu yapı dahilinde oluşan somut ve soyut gerçeklerin anlaşılmasını da kolaylaştırmaktadır. Kavram ve kavram dahilinde oluşan konseptlerin, kolektif eylemlerin sınırlanın belirlenmesi ve toplumsal iş birliğinin çözümlenmesi açısından özellikle iletişim sosyoloji alanında gerçekleştirilecek gelecek çalışmalara edeceği sunacağı düşünülmektedir.
References
- Anık, C. (2014). İletişim sosyolojisi: kuramsal temeller. Derin Yayınları.
- Krueger, J. (2018). “Intentionality.” - Giovanni Stanghellini vd. (Ed.) Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology, Oxford University Press.
- Lijun, H. (2019). “Revisit Euphemisms from the Perspective of Intentional ity”. Forum for Linguistic Studies 1 (1).
- Pierre J. (2019). “Intentionality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Erişim adresi: https://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/win2019/entries/intentionality/ Erişim Tarihi: 21.10.2019.
- Searle, J. R. (1983) Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Searle, J. R. (1990). “Collective intentions and actions.” Cohen P., Morgan J. Pollack M. (Ed.) Intentions in communication, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Searle, J. R. (1998) Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books.
- Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Tuomela, R. Ve Miller, K. (1988) ‘We-Intentions’. Philosophical Studies, 53, 115–37.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Sociology (Other) |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 15, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 12 Issue: 33 |
