Halk Sağlığı Hemşirelerinin Deneyimsel Öğrenme Eğitimi Ölçeği’nin Türk Kültürüne Uyarlanması

Year 2022, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 51 - 59, 30.04.2022

Adem Sümen , Derya Adıbelli

Abstract

Bu çalışma Halk Sağlığı Hemşirelerinin Deneyimsel Öğrenme Eğitimi Ölçeği’nin (HSH-DÖEÖ) Türk kültüründe geçerlik ve güvenirliğini test etmek ve psikometrik özelliklerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma metodolojik tipte gerçekleştirilmiş olup araştırma kapsamına Türkiye’deki üniversitelerin halk sağlığı hemşireliği anabilim dalında görev yapan toplam 179 öğretim elemanı alınmıştır. HSH-DÖEÖ’nün psikometrik özelliklerini tespit etmek için kapsam dil geçerliği, yapı geçerliği, ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik, ayırt edicilik, iç tutarlık güvenirliği, iki yarı test güvenirliği ve madde analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre HSH-DÖEÖ’nin Türkçe formunun üç alt boyuta sahip olduğu ve toplam varyansın %%50.709’unu açıkladığı görülmüştür. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucu ölçeğin uyum iyiliği değerleri χ²/sd=1.76, RMSEA=0.066, CFI=0.90, GFI=0.90 ve AGFI=0.91 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca madde faktör yükleri de 0.517 ile 0.759 arasında sıralanmaktadır. Ölçeğin toplam cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı 0.86 bulunmuş, alt boyutları ise 0.63 ile 0.80 arasında değişmektedir. Araştırmada, HSH-DÖEÖ’nin Türk toplumu için kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ölçek, Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği eğitimcileri tarafından verilen eğitimi değerlendirmek için kullanılabilir.

Keywords

Deneyimsel öğrenme, Geçerlik, Güvenirlik, Halk sağlığı hemşireliği, Ölçek

Adaptation of the Public Health Nurse-Precepting Experiential Learning Scale to Turkish Culture

Abstract

This study was conducted to test the validity and reliability of the Public Health Nurse - Precepting Experiential Learning Scale (PHN‐PELS) in Turkish culture and to examine its psychometric properties. This study was conducted as a methodological study. 179 faculty members participated in the study, and the participation rate was 72.5%. Within the scope of the adaptation studies of the PHN‐PELS scale, language validity and construct validity in samples were first examined. Then, the reliability coefficients of the scale in the Turkish sample was calculated. According to the results of the exploratory factor analysis, it was observed that the Turkish form of PHN‐PELS had three sub-dimensions and explained 50.709% of the total variance. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the goodness of fit values of the scale were calculated as χ²/sd=1.76, RMSEA=0.066, CFI=0.90, GFI=0.90 and AGFI=0.91. Furthermore, item factor loadings ranged from 0.517 to 0.759. The total Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.86, and its sub-dimensions ranged from 0.63 to 0.80. In the study, it was concluded that the PHN‐PELS was a valid and reliable measurement tool that could be used for Turkish society. The scale can be used to evaluate the education provided by Public Health Nursing educators.

Keywords

Experiential learning, Public health nursing, Reliability, Scale, Validity

References

• American Public Health Association. (1996). The definition and role of public health nursing: A statement of APHA public health nursing section. Washington, DC. https://www.apha.org/~/media/files/pdf/membergroups/phn/nursingdefinition.ashx
• Altay, B., & Öz, Ö. (2016). Last class students of nursing department faced with difficulties at home visits within the context of public health and professional nursing roles. Journal of Samsun Health Sciences, 1(1), 87-98.
• Culha, I. (2019). Active learning methods used in nursing education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 3(2), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2019254174
• Çokluk, Ö. S., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S., (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: Spss ve Lisrel Uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
• Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4
• Demirel, A., & Akın, B. (2014). Social Justice, Equality and Nursing in Health. E-Journal of Dokuz Eylul University Nursing Faculty, 7(3), 238-45
• Dikmen, Y. (2015). Kolb’un öğrenme stilleri modeline göre hemşirelik öğrencilerinin öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Human Rhythm, 1(3), 100-106.
• Dixon, J. K. (2015). Exploratory factor analysis. In Plichta, S. B., Kelvin, E., (Eds), Munro’s statistical methods for health care research. (6th ed., pp. 371-398). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Evans‐Agnew, R., Reyes, D., Primomo, J., Meyer, K., & Matlock‐Hightower, C. (2017). Community health needs assessments: Expanding the boundaries of nursing education in population health. Public Health Nursing, 34(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12298
• Fewster-Thuente, L., & Batteson, T. J. (2018). Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory as a theoretical underpinning for interprofessional education. Journal of Allied Health, 47(1), 3-8.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Londra: Pearson Education.
• Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2012). Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
• Hill, B. (2017). Research into experiential learning in nurse education. British Journal of Nursing, 26(16), 932-938. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2017.26.16.932
• Houghton, C. E., Casey, D., Shaw, D., & Murphy, K. (2013). Students’ experiences of implementing clinical skills in the real world of practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(13-14), 1961-1969. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12014
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2017). Experiential learning theory as a guide for experiential educators in higher education. Experiential Learning & Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 7-44. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/elthe/vol1/iss1/7/
• LI, Y. X., & LI, L. P. (2017). Teaching effect of “community health nursing” based on Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory. Journal of Nursing, 1(7), 3.
• McCarthy, M. (2016). Experiential learning theory: From theory to practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 14(3), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v14i3.9749
• Morris, T. H. (2019). Experiential learning–a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
• Murray, R. (2018). An overview of experiential learning in nursing education. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.51.4102
• Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Shimazu, T. (2018). The development of a public health nurses precepting experiential learning scale. Japanese Journal of Public Health, 65(8), 377– 385. https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.65.8_377
• Siemon, M., Gallegos, C., & Gehrke, P. (2018). Assessment of public health core competencies in prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Public Health Nursing, 35(2), 150-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12368
• Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Association.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). USA: Pearson Education Limited.
• Yeşilyurt, S., & Çapraz, C. (2018). A road map for the content validity used in scale development studies. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 20(1), 251-64. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.297741
• Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079
• World Health Organization. (2018). Essential public health functions, health systems, and health security: developing conceptual clarity and a WHO roadmap for action. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2018. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272597/9789241514088-eng.pdf.
• World Health Organization. (2021, January 24). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/