Influence of Different Genres of Music on Static and Dynamic Balance Control of Young Adults

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 342 - 349, 01.06.2019

Turhan Kahraman , Mahmut Beşli , Bayram Ünver , Yeşim Salık Şengül

https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.472302

Abstract

Objectives:  Since listening
to music is very common while performing various activities of daily living
among young adults, it is important to know its effects on balance control.
This study aimed to examine the effects of different genres of music on static
and dynamic balance control, especially during common activities of daily
living such as sit-to-stand and walking, using both clinical and computerized
balance assessment tools.

Materials and Methods: Thirty-six
healthy young adults participated in this cross-sectional study. Static balance
was assessed using the modified Clinical Test Sensory Interaction on Balance in
a computerized balance assessment device. Moreover, the dynamic balance during
the common activities of daily living was assessed using the sit-to-stand test
and walk across test in the same device and the timed up and go test as a
clinical measure was also used to assess dynamic mobility. All the tests were performed in different conditions, including
without listening to the music, listening to pop, rock, and, classical music.

Results: There were
18 female and 18 male participants with a mean age of 23.0 (1.0) years. No
statistically significant differences were found in the static and dynamic
postural control variables (p>0.05).
Partial eta squared values indicated that the effect sizes were small.

Conclusion: This
study suggests that different genres of music including classical, rock, and
pop do not influence the static and dynamic balance control in young adults.
The influence of different genres of music with different frequency or groove
properties on balance control and chronic effects of music should be
investigated in future studies.

Keywords

Static, dynamic, balance, music, activities of daily living

Farklı Müzik Türlerinin Genç Erişkinlerin Statik ve Dinamik Denge Kontrolüne Etkisi

Abstract

DOI:10.17681/hsp.472302

Amaç: Müzik
dinlemek, genç erişkinler arasında çeşitli günlük yaşam aktiviteleri sırasında
çok yaygın yapılan bir aktivite olduğu için müziğin denge kontrolüne etkisini
bilmek önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, farklı müzik türlerinin statik denge ve özellikle
oturup ayağa kalkma ve yürüme gibi günlük yaşam aktiviteleri sırasındaki dinamik
denge kontrolü üzerindeki etkilerinin klinik ve bilgisayarlı denge
değerlendirme araçlarını kullanarak araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

Gereç ve Yöntemler: Otuz altı sağlıklı genç erişkin bu çapraz
tasarımlı çalışmaya katıldı. Statik denge, bilgisayarlı denge değerlendirme
cihazında modifiye Denge Duyu İnteraksiyonu Klinik Testi kullanarak
değerlendirildi. Ayrıca, yaygın günlük yaşam aktiviteleri sırasındaki dinamik
denge aynı cihazda, otur-kalk testi ve yürüme testiyle değerlendirildi. Klinik
bir test olarak zamanlı kalk ve yürü testi de dinamik mobiliteyi değerlendirmek
için kullanıldı. Tüm testler, müzik dinlemezken, pop, rock ve klasik müzik
dinlerken olmak üzere farklı koşullar altında gerçekleştirildi.

Bulgular:
Ortalama yaşları 23,0 (SS = 1,0) yıl
olan 18 kadın ve 18 erkek katılımcı vardı. Statik ve dinamik postürel kontrol
değişkenlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p>0,05). Parsiyel eta kare değerleri,
etki büyüklüklerinin küçük olduğunu gösterdi.

Sonuç: Bu
çalışma, klasik, rock ve pop gibi farklı müzik türlerinin genç erişkinlerde
statik ve dinamik denge kontrolünü etkilemediğini gösterdi. Gelecekteki
çalışmalarda farklı müzik türlerinin farklı frekans ve ritim özellikleri ile
denge kontrolü ve bu müziklerin kronik etkileri araştırılmalıdır.

Keywords

Statik, dinamik, denge, müzik, günlük yaşam aktiviteleri

References

• Baloh RW, Honrubia V, Kerber KA. Baloh and Honrubia's Clinical Neurophysiology of the Vestibular System. Overview of Vestibular Anatomy and Physiology2011.
• Forti S, Filipponi E, Di Berardino F, Barozzi S, Cesarani A. The influence of music on static posturography. Journal of Vestibular Research. 2010;20(5):351-6.
• Peretz I, Zatorre RJ. Brain organization for music processing. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:89-114.
• Menon V, Levitin DJ. The rewards of music listening: response and physiological connectivity of the mesolimbic system. Neuroimage. 2005;28(1):175-84.
• Koelsch S, Siebel WA. Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2005;9(12):578-84.
• Palm HG, Strobel J, Achatz G, von Luebken F, Friemert B. The role and interaction of visual and auditory afferents in postural stability. Gait Posture. 2009;30(3):328-33.
• Tanaka T, Kojima S, Takeda H, Ino S, Ifukube T. The influence of moving auditory stimuli on standing balance in healthy young adults and the elderly. Ergonomics. 2001;44(15):1403-12.
• Nazareth I, Landau S, Yardley L, Luxon L. Patterns of presentations of dizziness in primary care--a cross-sectional cluster analysis study. Journal of psychosomatic research. 2006;60(4):395-401.
• Soames RW, Raper SA. The influence of moving auditory fields on postural sway behaviour in man. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology. 1992;65(3):241-5.
• Agaeva MY, Al'tman YA, Kirillova IY. Effects of a sound source moving in a vertical plane on postural responses in humans. Neuroscience and behavioral physiology. 2006;36(7):773-80.
• Hegeman J, Honegger F, Kupper M, Allum JH. The balance control of bilateral peripheral vestibular loss subjects and its improvement with auditory prosthetic feedback. Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation. 2005;15(2):109-17.
• Dozza M, Horak FB, Chiari L. Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance. Experimental brain research. 2007;178(1):37-48.
• Ross JM, Balasubramaniam R. Auditory white noise reduces postural fluctuations even in the absence of vision. Experimental brain research. 2015;233(8):2357-63.
• Carrick FR, Oggero E, Pagnacco G. Posturographic changes associated with music listening. Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, NY). 2007;13(5):519-26.
• Hyong IH. The effects on dynamic balance of dual-tasking using smartphone functions. Journal of physical therapy science. 2015;27(2):527-9.
• Ozcan Kahraman B, Salik Sengul Y, Kahraman T, Kalemci O. Developing a Reliable Core Stability Assessment Battery for Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(14):E844-50.
• Kahraman T, Ozcan Kahraman B, Salik Sengul Y, Kalemci O. Assessment of sit-to-stand movement in nonspecific low back pain: a comparison study for psychometric properties of field-based and laboratory-based methods. International journal of rehabilitation research Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 2016;39(2):165-70.
• Hafsteinsdottir TB, Rensink M, Schuurmans M. Clinimetric properties of the Timed Up and Go Test for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(3):197-210.
• Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142-8.
• Russolo M. Sound-evoked postural responses in normal subjects. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2002;122(1):21-7.
• Alessandrini M, Lanciani R, Bruno E, Napolitano B, Di Girolamo S. Posturography frequency analysis of sound-evoked body sway in normal subjects. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck. 2006;263(3):248-52.
• Mainenti MRM, De Oliveira LF, De MADMT, Nadal J. Stabilometric signal analysis in tests with sound stimuli. Experimental brain research. 2007;181(2):229-36.
• McNevin NH, Wulf G. Attentional focus on supra-postural tasks affects postural control. Human movement science. 2002;21(2):187-202.
• Ross JM, Warlaumont AS, Abney DH, Rigoli LM, Balasubramaniam R. Influence of musical groove on postural sway. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016;42(3):308.