THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE

Year 2015, , 113 - 140, 27.08.2015

Ayşe Ötken

https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.83618

Cited By: 17

Abstract

Psychological
ownership is defined as the state which individuals feel that a piece of target
is theirs. Even in the absence of legal ownership, individuals might develop
psychological ownership directed at an organization, a group, an idea, a
suggestion, an equipment or a job. Limited research on the antecedents and
consequences of psychological ownership make the concept rather interesting. Thus,
the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between perceived
organizational support and psychological ownership and the role of
organizational justice which has the potential to explain various
organizational behavior. Data were collected by questionnaires from 250
employees working in different organizations operating in different sectors.
Results showed that perceived organizational support items loaded on two
factors as “work related support” and “emotional support” and there is a positive
relationship between both of the perceived organizational support factors and
psychological ownership. Additionally, results showed that distributive,
interactional and procedural justice has a moderating role on the relationship
between “work related support” and psychological ownership stressing that this
relationship is significant only when the organizational justice factors are
low in the organization.    

Keywords

Psychological ownership, perceived organizational support, organizational justice

ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK VE PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ VE BU İLİŞKİDE ÖRGÜTSEL ADALETİN ROLÜ

Abstract

Psikolojik sahiplenme, bireylerin herhangi bir “nesneyi” kendilerininmiş gibi hissettiği durum olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bireyler, hukuki anlamda bir sahiplik olmasa da örgüte, gruba, fikre, öneriye, ekipmana ve işe karşı psikolojik sahiplenme geliştirebilmektedirler. Psikolojik sahiplenmenin öncelleri ve sonuçları hakkında sınırlı sayıda araştırma bulunması konuyu ilginç kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı da algılanan örgütsel destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve bu ilişkide birçok örgütsel davranışı açıklama potansiyeline sahip olan örgütsel adaletin rolünü araştırmaktır. Veriler, anket yolu ile İstanbul’da farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren örgütlerdeki 250 çalışandan toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, algılanan örgütsel desteğin işle ilgili destek ve duygusal destek olmak üzere iki faktörden oluştuğunu ve her iki faktör ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında pozitif bir ilişkinin bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Buna ek olarak, sonuçlar dağıtım, etkileşimsel ve işlemsel adaletin çalışana işle ilgili verilen destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında düzenleyici role sahip olduğunu gösterirken, örgütsel adaletin düşük olduğu durumlarda işle ilgili verilen destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin söz konusu olduğu gibi ilginç bir sonucu da vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

Psikolojik sahiplenme, algılanan örgütsel destek, örgütsel adalet

References

• Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academy Press, 267-299.
• Aiken, L.S., S.G. West, (1991), Multiple Regression. Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park: Sage.
• Asatryan, V.S., H. Oh, (2008), “Psychological ownership theory: an Exploratory Application in the Restaurant Industry”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 32, 363–86.
• Baron, R.M., D.A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
• Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley.
• Bies, R.J., J.F. Moag (1986), “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness”, in R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, M.H. Bazerman (eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Greenwich: JAI Press, 43-55.
• Blau, P.M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Life, New York: Wiley.
• Börü, D., B. Güneşer (2006), “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve Lider Üye Etkileşiminin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile İlişkisi ve Güvenin Rolü”, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüs Dergisi, 7(25), 43-58.
• Çakar, N.D., S. Yıldız (2009), “Örgütsel Adaletin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: ‘Algılanan Örgütsel Destek’ Bir Ara Değişken Mi?”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(28), 68-90.
• Chi, Nai-Wen, Tzu-Shian, Ha (2008), “Exploring the Linkages between Formal Ownership and Psychological Ownership for the Organization: The Mediating Role of Organizational Justice”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691-711.
• Colquitt, J.A. (2001), “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
• De Cremer, D., M. Van Dijke, A.E.R. Bos (2007), “When Leaders Seen as Transformational: The Effects of Organizational Justice”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1797- 1816.
• Demir, M. (2012), “Örgütsel Destek, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi İlişkisi: Havalimanı Yer Hizmetleri İşletmelerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources, 14(1), 49-64.
• Dittmar, H. (1992), “Perceived Material Wealth and First Impressions”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 379-391.
• Eisenberger, R., R. Huntington, S. Hutchison, D. Sowa (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
• Eisenberger, R., L. Rhoades, J. Cameron (1999), “Does Pay for Performance Increase or Decrease Perceived Self-Determination and Intrinsic Motivation?”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1026–1040.
• Erkuş, A., Ö. Turunç, R. Yücel (2011), “Örgütsel Adalet ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerde İçsel ve Dışsal İş Tatmininin Aracılık Rolü: Bankacılık Sektöründe bir Uygulama”, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 6(1), 245-270.
• Fuller, J.B., T. Barnett, K. Hester, C. Relyea (2003), “A Social Identity Perspective on the Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Social Psychology, 143(6), 789-791.
• Furby, L. (1978), “Sharing: Decisions and Moral Judgements about Letting Others Use One’s Possessions”, Psychological Reports, 43, 595-609.
• Greenberg, J. (1990a), “Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
• Greenberg, J. (1990b), "Looking Fair vs Being Fair: Managing Impressions of Organizational Justice" B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings, (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich: Jai Press, 12, 111-157.
• Greenberg, J. (1990), “Organization Justice: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow”, Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
• Gouldner, A.W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”, American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
• Harris, R.B., K.J. Harris, P. Harvey (2007), “A Test of Competing Models of the Relationships Among Perceptions of Organizational Politics, Perceived Organizational Support, and Individual Outcomes”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(6), 631-655.
• Hutchison, S. (1997), “A Path Model of Perceived Organizational Support,” Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159–174.
• İşcan, Ö.F., A. Naktiyok (2004), “Çalışanların Örgütsel Bağdaşımlarının Belirleyicileri Olarak Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Adalet Algısı”, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 59(1), 181-201.
• Leventhal, G.S. (1980), “What should be done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study Fairness in Social Relationships”, in K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, R. Willis. (ed.), Social Exchange. Advances in Theory and Research, New York: Plenum, (27-55).
• Mayhew, M.G., N.M., Ashkanasy, T. Bramble, J. Gardner, (2007), “A Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Pscyhological Ownership in Organizational Settings”, Journal of Social Pscyhology, 147, 477-500.
• McIntyre, N., A. Srivastava, J.A. Fuller (2009), “The Relationship of Locus of Control and Motives with Psychological Ownership in Organizations”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(3), 383-401.
• Meyer, J.P., and Allen, N.J. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Morrow, P. C. (1983),. Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8, 486-500.
• Mowday, R.T., R. Steers, L.W. Porter (1992), Employee Organizational Linkages, San Diego: Academic Press.
• Noruzy, A., K. Shatery, A. Rezazadeh, L.H. Shirkouhi (2011), “Investigation the Relationship between Organizational Justice, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support”, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 4(7), 842-847.
• Nowakowski, J.M., D.E. Conlon (2005), “Organizational Justice: Looking Back, Looking Forward”, International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(1), 4-29.
• Orpen, C. (1994), “The Effects of Exchange Ideology on the Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Job Performance”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(3), 407-408.
• Özmen, Ö.T., Y. Arbak, P.S. Özer, Pınar (2005), “Değerler ve Adalet”, Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi, Marmara Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. İşletme Bölümü Yönetim ve Organizasyon Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, 161-162.
• Paré, G., C. Sicotte, C., H. Jacques (2006), “The Effects of Creating Psychological Ownership on Physicians’ Acceptance of Clinical Information Systems”, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13, 197–205.
• Parker, S.K., T.D. Wall, P.R. Jackson (1997), “That’s Not My Job: Developing Flexible Employee Work Orientations”, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 899-929.
• Pierce, J.L., S.A. Rubenfeld, S. Morgan (1991), “Employee Ownership: A Conceptual Model of Process and Effects”, Academy of Management Review, 15, 121-144.
• Pierce, J.L., T. Kostova, K.T. Dirks (2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 26, 298-310.
• Pierce, J.L., T. Kostova, K.T. Dirks (2003) “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research”, Review of General Psychology, 7, 84-107.
• Pierce, J.L., O’Driscoll, M.P., A. Coghlan (2004), Work Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control, Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 507–534.
• Porteous, J.D. (1976), Home: The Territorial Core. Geographical Review, 66, 383–390.
• Randall, M. L., R. Cropanzano, C.A. Bormann, A. Birjulin (1999) “Organizational Politics and Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 159– 174.
• Shapiro, D.L., E.H. Buttner, B. Barry (1994), “Explanations: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy?”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 45-67.
• Shore, L.M., S.J. Wayne (1993), “Commitment and Employee Behavior: Comparison of Affective Commitment and Continuance Commitment with Perceived Organizational Support” Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780.
• Tajfel, H. (1978), “Social Categorization, Social Identity and Social Comparison”, in H. Tajfel (ed.), Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Pscyhology of Intergroup Relations, London: Academic Press.
• Turunç, Ö., M. Çelik (2010), “Çalışanların Algıladıkları Örgütsel Destek ve İş Stresinin Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Performansına Etkisi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 17(2), 183-206.
• Van Dyne, L., J.L. Pierce (2004), “Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 439–459.
• Wayne, S.J., L.M. Shore, R.C. Liden (1997), “Perceived Organizational Support and Leader- Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-112.
• Wen-Chih, L., T. Wei-Tao (2006), “Organizational Justice, Motivation to Learn, and Training Outcomes”, Social Behavior and Personality, 34(5), 545-556.3