GİRİŞİMCİ YÖNLÜLÜK, İÇ-GİRİŞİMCİLİK VE İŞLETME PERFORMANS İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE TEKSTİL SEKTÖRÜ İŞLETMELERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2016, Volume: 34 Issue: 4, 19 - 48, 31.12.2016

Gürcan Papatya , Nurhan Papatya , Ahmet Buğra Hamşıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.310516

Cited By: 5

Abstract

Bu
çalışma İSO-500 listesinde yer alan Türkiye tekstil sektör işletmelerinin
girişimci yönlülük ve iç-girişimcilik faaliyetleri ile işletme performansı
arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemeye yönelik görgül bir araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Girişimci
yönlülük, iç-girişimcilik ve işletme performansı olarak üç boyutlu tasarlanan
çalışmada anket yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Anket 96 işletmeye 2015
Şubat-Mart ayında faks ve e-mail yoluyla gönderilmiş; ankete katılımı kabul
eden 51 işletmeden anket geri dönüşümü sağlanmıştır. 51 işletmeden elde edilen
veriler değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Veriler, SPSS 11.5 ve Lisrel 8.7
istatistiki programlar yardımıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve yapısal eşitlik
model analizi ile test edilmiştir. Analizde
araştırmada oluşturulan, “girişimci yönlülük işletme performansını pozitif
etkiler” şeklindeki birinci hipotez ve “iç-girişimcilik işletme performansını
pozitif etkiler” şeklindeki ikinci hipotez red edilmemek suretiyle, araştırma
modeli doğrulanmıştır.

Keywords

Girişimci yönlülük, iç-girişimcilik, işletme performansı, Türkiye tekstil sektörü

ENTREPRENEURSHIP ORIENTATION, INTREPRENEURSHIP AND BUSINESS PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: AN RESEARCH IN THE TURKISH TEXTILE SECTOR BUSINESS

Abstract

This
study aims to do an empirical research on the relationship between the
entrepreneurship and
intrapreneurship activities of textile enterprises
from Turkey’s Top 500 Company List (İSO-500), and their business performances. The study is designed
with the three dimensions as entrepreneurship, intrapreneurship and business
performance and deployed a survey method. Survey was sent to 96 enterprises by
fax and e-mail in February-March 2015; 51 enterprises agreed to participate in
the study and sent the filled surveys back. The data obtained from the 51
enterprises were analyzed and tested by confirmatory factor analysis and
structural equation model analysis using
the statistical software programs SPSS 11.5 and Lisrel 8.7. The
research model was verified by not rejecting the first hypothesis as
“Entrepreneurship tendency positively effects business performance” and the second
hypothesis as “Intrapreneurship positively effects business performance”.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship orientation, intrapreneurship, firm performance, textile sector

References

• Achrol, R., L. Stern (1988), “Environmental Determinants of Decision-Making Uncertainty in Marketing Channels”, Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 25-36.
• Alpkan L., E. Ergün, Ç. Bulut, C. Yılmaz (2005), “Şirket Girişimciliğinin Şirket Performansına Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), 175-189.
• Altuntaş G., D. Dönmez (2010), “Girişimcilik Yönelimi ve Örgütsel Performans İlişkisi: Çanakkale Bölgesinde Faaliyet Gösteren Otel İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1), 50-74.
• Alvarez, S.A., L.W. Busenit (2001), “The Entrepreneurship of Resource Based Theory”, Journal of Management, 27(6), 755-775.
• Antoncic B., O. Zorn (2001), “The Mediating Role of Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Organizational Support-Performance Relationship: An Empirical Examination”, Managing Global Transitions, 2(1), 5-14.
• Antoncic, B., R. Hisrich (2000), “Intrapreneurship Modeling in Transition Economies: A Comparison of Slovenia and the United States” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 21-40.
• Antoncic, B., R. Hisrich (2001), “Intrepreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495-527.
• Antoncic, B., R. Hisrich (2003), “Clarifying and Intrapreneurship Concept”, Journal of Small Business and Entreprise Development, 10(1), 7-24.
• Antoncic, B., R. Hisrich (2004),”Corporate Entrepreneurship Contingencies and Organizational Wealth Creation”,Journal of Management Development, 23(6), 518-550.
• Barrett, H., A. Weinstein (1998), “The Effect of Market Orientation and Organizational Flexibility on Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 57-70.
• Beamon, B.M. (1999), “Measuring Supply Chain Performance”, Inertational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(3), 275-292.
• Bentler, P.M. (1990), “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models”, Psychological Bulletin, 17(2), 238-246.
• Bontis, N. (1998), “Intellectual Capital: An Exploratory Study that Develops Measures and Models”, Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
• Bontis, N., C.K. William, S. Richardson (2000), “Intellectual Capital and Business Performance In Malaysian Industries”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 85-100.
• Bulu,t Ç. (2007), “Stratejik Oryantasyonlar ve Firma Performansı”, İzmit: Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
• Burgelman, R.A. (1983), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Insight from a Process Study”, Management Science, 29(12), 1349-1365.
• Burgelman, R.A. (1984), ”Designs for Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Firms”, California Management Review, 26(3), 155-166.
• Covin, J.G., M.P. Miles (1999), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 47-63.
• Covin, J.G., P.D. Slevin (1991), “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behaviour”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7-25.
• Covin, J.G., P.D. Slevin (1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments”, Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87.
• Çokluk, Ö., G. Şekercioğlu, Ş. Büyüköztürk (2012), “Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları”, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Demirel, Y., D. Özbezek (2015), “İşletmelerde İç Girişimcilik ve Yenilikçilik İlişkisine Yönelik Kavramsal Bir İnceleme”, TİSK Akademi, 10(19), 112-135.
• Dickson, P., J. Giglierano (1986), “Missing the Boat and Sinking the Boat: A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurial Risk”, Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 58-70.
• Echols, A.E., C.P. Neck (1998), “The Impact of Behaviors and Structure on Corporate Entrepreneurial Success”, Journal of Managerial Psychology,13(1/2), 38-46.
• Fiş, M.A. (2009), “Unlocking The Relationship Between Corporate Entrepreneurship and Performance”, İstanbul: Sabancı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitisü, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi.
• Gatignon, H., M.J. Xuereb (1997), “Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance”, Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90.
• Gautam V., V. Verma (1997), “Corporate Entrepreneurship: Changing Perspectives”, Journal of Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 233-274.
• Guth, W.D., A. Ginsberg (1990), “Guest Editors Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(Summer), 5-15.
• Gürel, E.B.B. (2011), “Firma Performansının Belirlenmesinde İç Girişimciliğin Rolü-ISO 500 Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finansal Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar Dergisi, 48(559), 99-116.
• Gürel, E.B.B. (2012), “İç Girişimcilik: Bir Literatür Taraması”, Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Elektronik Dergisi, 6(Haziran), 56-75.
• Hanan, M. (1976), “Venturing Corporations -Thing Small to Stay Strong”, Harvard Business Review, 54(3), 139-148.
• Hornsby, J., D. Kuratko, S. Zahra (2002), “Middle Managers Perception of the Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing a Measurement Scale”, Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 253-273.
• Krueger, N.F., D.V. Brazeal (1994), “Entrepreneurial Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104.
• Kuratko, D.F., R.V. Montagno, J.S. Hornsby (1990), “Developing An Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument For An Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment”, Strategic Management Journal,11(Summer), 49-58.
• Lumpkin, G.T., G.G. Dess (1996), “Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Linking It to Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
• Lumpkin, G.T., G.G. Dess, (2001), “Linking two Dimension of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
• Menon, A., S.G. Bharadwaj, R. Howell (1996), “The Quality and Effectiveness of Marketing Strategy: Effect of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict in Intraorganizational Relationship”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(4), 299-313.
• Miller, D. (1983), “The Correlates of Entrepreneurship In Three Types of Firms”, Management Science, 29(7), 770-791.
• Miller, D., H.P. Friesen (1982), “Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms:Two Models of Strategic Momentum”, Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25.
• Morgan, N.A., D.W. Vorhies (2001), “Product Quality Aligment and Business Unit Performance”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(6), 396-407.
• Morris, M., L.S. Donald (1996), “The Concept of Entrepreneurial Intensity: Implications for Company Performance”, Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 5-13.
• Murphy, D., J.W. Trailer, R Hill (1996), “Measuring Organizational Performance in Entrepreneurship”, Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 15-23.
• Naktiyok, A. (2004), “İç Girişimcilik”, İstanbul: Beta.
• Naman, L.J., P.D. Slevin (1993), “Entrepreneurship and The Concept of Fit: A Model and Empirical Tests”, Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 137-153.
• Netemeyer, R., W.O. Bearden, S. Sharma (2003), “Scaling Procedures: Issies and Applications”, U.S.A. 2nd Ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
• Onay, M., S. Çavuşoğlu (2010), “İşletmelerde Girişimcilik Özelliğini Etkileyen Faktörler: İç Girişimcilik”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 17(1), 47-67.
• Papatya, N. (2005), “Sürdürülebilir Başarı için İç-Girişimcilik” iç. A. Bozgeyik, Girişimcilere Yol Haritası, İstanbul: Hayat Yayıncılık No. 210/59, 83-87.
• Papatya, G., N. Papatya, A.B. Hamşıoğlu (2006), “KOBİ'lerde İç-Girişimcilik Yönelimi: İç-Girişimciliği Destekleyecek Alt Yapı Çalışmaları Üzerine Uygulama”, 17-18 Kasım, İstanbul 3. KOBİ’ler ve Verimlilik Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 239-252.
• Papatya, N. (2006a), "İşletmelerde Sıradışı Rekabet için Yenilikçi Pazarlama Yaklaşımı", Pazarlama Dünyası Dergisi, 20(4), 42-46.
• Papatya, N. (2006b), "Pazarlamada Değişimin Ötesi: Yaratıcı ve Yenilikçi Pazarlama Dönüşümü", Pazarlama Dünyası Dergisi, 20(1), 73-77.
• Papatya, N. (2007), “Sürdürülebilir Rekabetçi Üstünlük Sağlamada Stratejik Yönetim ve Pazarlama Odağı Kaynak Tabanlı Görüş -Kavramsal ve Kuramsal Yaklaşım”, Ankara: Asil.
• Parker, S.C. (2011), “Intrapreneurship or Entrepreneurship?”, Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 19-34.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., H. Moosbrugger (2003), “Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Test of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures” Methods of Psychological Research Online , 8(2), 23-74.
• Shane, S., S. Venkataraman, I. MacMillan (1995), “Cultural Difference in Innovation Championing Strategies”, Journal of Management, 21(5), 931-952.
• Stevenson, H.H., J.C. Jarillo (1990), “A Paradigim of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 17-27.
• Stopford J.M., C.W.F. Baden-Fuller (1994), “Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 521-536.
• Şimşek, Ö., F. (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş- Temel İlkeler ve Lirsel Uygulamaları, Ankara: Ekinoks. Thornberry, N. (2003), “Corporate Entrepreneurship: Teaching Managers to be Entrepreneurs”, The Journal of Management Development, 22(4), 329-344.
• Wiklund, J., D.A. Shepherd (2005), “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configuration Approach”, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71-91.
• Zahra, S., J.G. Covin (1995), “Contextual Influences on The Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43-58.
• Zahra, S. (1991), “Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259-285.
• Zahra, S. (1993a), “Environment Corporate Entrepreneurship and Financial Performance: A Taxonomic Approach”, Journal of Business Venturing, 8(4), 319-340.
• Zahra, S. (1993b), “New Product Innovation in Established Companies: Associations with Industry and Strategy Variables”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(2), 47-67.
• Zahra, S. (1993c), “Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(4), 5-21.
• Zahra, S. (1995), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and Financial Performance: The Case of Management Leveraged Buyouts”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 225-247.
• Zahra, S., D. Garvis (2000),“International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderatıng Effect of International Environmental Hostility”, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 469-492.