Sünnet Sonrası Glans Penis Amputasyonu

Year 2016, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 257 - 260, 30.12.2016

Mustafa Erman Dörterler , Osman Hakan Kocaman , Mehmet Emin Boleken Tansel Günendi

Abstract

Sünnet her operasyon gibi komplikasyonsuz olmayıp komplikasyon oranı % 0.2 ile % 5 arasındadır. Sünnetin en ağır
komplikasyonu penis veya glansın amputasyonudur. Uygun olmayan sünnet tekniği en önemli nedendir.
Bu olgu sunumunda, 5 yaşında bir erkek çocukta, sünnet sırasında amplute olan glans penis nedeniyle sünnet ve
komplikasyonları tartışılmıştır. 

Keywords

Sünnet, Penis, Amputasyon

Amputation of Glans Penis After Circumcision

Abstract

Circumcision, like any other operation, is not complication-free and its complication rate ranges from 0,2 to 5%. The
most severe complication of circumcision is the amputation of penis or glans. Inappropriate technique of circumcision
is the most common cause of such complications.
In this case presentation, circumcision and its complications have been discussed in a five year-old boy whose glans
penis has been amputated during circumcision.

Keywords

Circumcision, Penis, Amputation

References

• 1. Yapanoğlu T, Aksoy Y, Atmaca AF, Ziypak T, Cesur M,Özbey İ. Complications of circumcision in our region.[Article in Turkish] Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2004;30:441-5.
• 2. Brisson PA, Patel HI, Feins NR. Revision of circumcision in children: Report of 56 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37: 1343-6.
• 3. Özdemir E. Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions. Br J Urol 1997;80:136-9.
• 4. Gerharz EW, Haarmann C. The first cut is the deepest? Medicolegal aspects of male circumcision. BJU Int 2000;86:332-8.
• 5.. Karaman MI, Zulfikar B, Caskurlu T, Ergenekon E. Circumcision in hemophilia: a cost-effective method using a novel device. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39: 1562-4.
• 6. Vaos G. Circumcision with the Nd:YAG laser contact technique compared with conventional surgery. Photomed Laser Surg 2004;22:318-22.
• 7. Subramaniam R, Jacobsen AS. Sutureless circumcision: a prospective randomised controlled study. Pediatr Surg Int 2004;20: 783-5.
• 8. Elemen L, Seyidov TH, Tugay M. The advantages of cyanoacrylate wound closure in circumcision. Pediatr Surg Int 2011;27: 879-83.
• 9.Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar MM, Basar H. Psychological trauma of circumcision in the phallic period could be avoided by using topical steroids. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 651-656.
• 10.El-Bahnasawy MS, El-Sherbiny MT. Pediatric penile trauma. BJU Int 2002; 90: 92-96.
• 11.Özkan S, Gurpinar T. A serious circumcision complication: penile shaft amputation and a new reattachment technique with a successful outcome. J Urol 1997; 158: 1946-1947.
• 12.Lidman D, Danielsson P, Abdiu A, Fahraeus B. The functional result two years after a microsurgical penile replantation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999; 33: 325-328.
• 13.Çek D, Sözübir S, Güvenç BH, Elbüken ME. A rare complication of circumcision: coronal penile amputation successfully treated by replantation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Eur J Plast Surg 2001; 24: 307-309.