Effect of polymer and surfactant concentrations on PVP nanofibers morphology

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 99 - 105, 15.08.2020

Hülya Kesici Güler , Funda Cengiz Çallıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.35860/iarej.692080

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, biocompatible polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) based nanofiber production was carried out with various polymer and surfactant concentrations. Firstly; various concentrations of PVP (6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 wt %) polymer solutions were prepared, solution properties (conductivity, viscosity, surface tension, pH and density) were determined and nanofiber production was achieved under the optimum process parameters. 12 wt % PVP concentration was chosen as an optimum in terms of nanofiber morphology and fiber fineness. Then, polymer concentration was kept constant at 12 wt % and various concentrations of surfactant (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 wt %) added into the polymer solutions. According to the solution properties and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images; conductivity, viscosity and average fiber diameter increased with polymer and surfactant concentrations increasement and ultra-fine, bead free and uniform nanofibers were obtained. On the other hand, surface tension and pH values were affected by polymer concentration changing, however, surface tension decreased significantly and pH decreased slightly with the addition of surfactant to the PVP polymer solution. Moreover, the density of polymer solutions increased with both polymer solution and surfactant concentration increasement.

Keywords

Electrospinning, Nanofiber, Polyvinylpyrrolidone, Surfactant

Supporting Institution

Suleyman Demirel University Scientific Researches Project

Project Number

FDK-2019-6761

Thanks

This work was supported by Suleyman Demirel University Scientific Researches Project Unit under Research Project (project no: FDK-2019-6761). Part of this study was presented at International Conference on Technology and Science organized on 14-16 November, 2019 in Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University.

References

• 1. Subbiah, T., et al., Electrospinning of nanofibers. Journal of applied polymer science, 2005. 96(2): p. 557-569.
• 2. Tucker, N., et al., The history of the science and technology of electrospinning from 1600 to 1995. Journal of engineered fibers and fabrics, 2012. 7(2_suppl): p. 155892501200702S10.
• 3. Bhardwaj, N., and S.C. Kundu, Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnology advances, 2010. 28(3): p. 325-347.
• 4. Dhandayuthapani, B., U.M. Krishnan, and S. Sethuraman, Fabrication and characterization of chitosan‐gelatin blend nanofibers for skin tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2010. 94(1): p. 264-272.
• 5. Salles, T.H.C., C.B. Lombello, and M.A. d'Ávila, Electrospinning of gelatin/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) blends from water/acetic acid solutions. Materials Research, 2015. 18(3): p. 509-518.
• 6. Deitzel, J.M., et al., The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer, 2001. 42(1): p. 261-272.
• 7. Lubasova, D. and L. Martinova, Controlled morphology of porous polyvinyl butyral nanofibers. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2011.
• 8. Shao, H., et al., Effect of electrospinning parameters and polymer concentrations on mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion of randomly-oriented electrospun poly (vinylidene fluoride) nanofiber mats. RSC advances, 2015. 5(19): p. 14345-14350.
• 9. Tarus, B., et al., Effect of polymer concentration on the morphology and mechanical characteristics of electrospun cellulose acetate and poly (vinyl chloride) nanofiber mats. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2016. 55(3): p. 2975-2984.
• 10. Thompson, C., et al., Effects of parameters on nanofiber diameter determined from electrospinning model. Polymer, 2007. 48(23): p. 6913-6922.
• 11. Veleirinho, B., M.F. Rei, and J. Lopes‐DA‐Silva, Solvent and concentration effects on the properties of electrospun poly (ethylene terephthalate) nanofiber mats. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics, 2008. 46(5): p. 460-471.
• 12. He, J.-H., et al., Electrospun nanofibres and their applications. 2008: ISmithers Shawbury, UK.
• 13. Ramakrishna, S., et al., An introduction to electrospinning and nanofibers. 2005. Singapura: World Scientific Publishing Company.
• 14. Rachmawati, H., et al., The in vitro–in vivo safety confirmation of peg-40 hydrogenated castor oil as a surfactant for oral nanoemulsion formulation. Scientia Pharmaceutica, 2017. 85(2): p. 18.
• 15. Fallahi, D., M. Rafizadeh, N. Mohammadi, and B.Vahidi, Effect of LiCl and non-ionic surfactant on morphology of polystyrene electrospun nanofibers. e-Polymers, 2008. 8(1). p. 1-9.
• 16. Deng, L., et al., Effects of surfactants on the formation of gelatin nanofibres for controlled release of curcumin. Food chemistry, 2017, 231, p. 70-77.
• 17. Abutaleb, Ahmed, et al. Effects of surfactants on the morphology and properties of electrospun polyetherimide fibers. Fibers, 2017. 5(3) 33.
• 18. Cengiz, F. and O. Jirsak, The effect of salt on the roller electrospinning of polyurethane nanofibers. Fibers and Polymers, 2009. 10(2): p. 177-184.
• 19. Sarac, A.S., Nanofibers of conjugated polymers. 2017: Jenny Stanford Publishing.
• 20. Sarhan, W.A., H.M. Azzazy, and I.M. El-Sherbiny, The effect of increasing honey concentration on the properties of the honey/polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofibers. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2016. 67: p. 276-284.
• 21. Ogino, K., N. Tsubaki, and M. Abe, Solution properties of mixed surfactant system (II): Electric properties of anionic-nonionic surfactants in aqueous solutions. Journal of colloid and interface science, 1984. 98(1): p. 78-83.
• 22. Santibenchakul, S., S. Chaiyasith, and W. Pecharapa, Effect of PVP concentration on microstructure and physical properties of electrospun SnO2 nanofibers. Integrated Ferroelectrics, 2016, 175(1), p. 130-137.
• 23. Lee, H., et al., Control of the morphology of cellulose acetate nanofibers via electrospinning. Cellulose, 2018, 25(5), p. 2829-2837.
• 24. Kuchi, C., and P. S. Reddy, Effect of polymer concentration and annealing temperature on TiO2-PVP composite nanofiber mats prepared with homemade electrospinning. In AIP Conference Proceedings AIP Publishing LLC, 2018, 1953(1): p. 030241.
• 25. Chang, W., Nanofibers: Fabrication, Performance, and Applications. 2009: Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.
• 26. Hu, J., M. P. Prabhakaran, X. Ding, and S. Ramakrishna, Emulsion electrospinning of polycaprolactone: influence of surfactant type towards the scaffold properties. Journal of Biomaterials Science, polymer edition, 2015, 26(1), p. 57-75.
• 27. Zheng, J. Y., et al., The effect of surfactants on the diameter and morphology of electrospun ultrafine nanofiber. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2014, p. 1-9.