KKTC'DE EVLİ BİREYLERİN EVLİLİĞE KARŞI TUTUMLARI, ÇATIŞMA VE ALDATMA EĞİLİMLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2018, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 377 - 388, 30.12.2018

Nihal Salman Meryem Karaaziz , Buse Keskindağ

https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.397643

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın genel amacı, evli bireyler arasındaki, evlilik uyumu, aldatma eğilimi ve çatışma eğilimi arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek aynı zamanda, cinsiyet ile her bir değişken arasındaki ilişkiyi de açıklamaktır. Yöntem: Evlilikte Uyum, Çatışma Eğilimi ve Aldatma Eğilimi ölçekleri veri toplama aracı olarak kullanılmıştır. Kuzey Kıbrıs Türk Cumhuriyeti’nde, kartopu tekniği ile oluşturulan örneklemden 120 evli bireyden elde edilen veriler değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan bireylerin %50,8’i kadın, %49,2’si ise erkektir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, hem kadınlar ve hem de erkekler için, evlilikte uyum ve çatışma arasında negatif korelasyon olduğu tespit edilmiştir, uyum arttıkça çatışma azalmaktadır. Aynı zamanda, kadınlarda ve erkeklerde çatışma ve aldatma eğilimi arasında, pozitif korelasyon olduğu ve evlilikte çatışma eğilimi arttıkça aldatma eğiliminin de arttığı saptanmıştır. Genel olarak katılımcı bireylerin aldatma eğiliminde oldukları fakat kadınlar ve erkeklerin aldatma eğilimi açısından anlamlı şekilde farklılaşmadıkları tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç: Aldatma ve çatışma eğiliminin evlilik uyumunu olumsuz etkileyebileceği dikkate alındığında bu araştırma, evlilik uyumunu inceleyecek olan araştırmalara ve evli insanlarla çalışan danışmanlara yol gösterici olabilir.

Keywords

evlilik, tutum, çatışma

EXAMINING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MARITAL ADJUSTMENT, TENDENCY FOR CONFLICT AND CHEATING AMONG MARRIED COUPLES

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the relationships between marital adjustment, tendency of conflict and cheating among married individuals. The current study also considers whether there are relationships between gender and each of variables. Method: The Marital Adjustment Scale, Tendency of Conflict Scale and Tendency of Cheating Scale were used as measurement tools in the current study. Snowball sampling technique was used and responses of 120 married individuals in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus were evaluated. Results: 50.8% of the participants were female while 49.2% of them were male. It has been found that there was a negative correlation between marital adjustment and conflict among both married women and men that is; when marital adjustment increases, the tendency of conflict decreases among married individuals. Also, there was a positive correlation between the tendency of conflict and cheating among both married women and men in other words; when the tendency of conflict increases, the tendency of cheating also rises among married individuals. The findings have generally suggested that there was a tendency to cheat among married individuals yet there was no significant difference between men and women in terms of the tendency of cheating. Conclusion: Considering the tendency of conflict and cheating negatively affect the marital adjustment, the current study can be helpful; for psychotherapists who work with married individuals as well as for future studies aiming to examine marital relationships.

Keywords

marriage, attitudes, conflict

References

• References Allen, E. S. & Baucom, D. H. (2004).Adult attachment and patterns of extradyadicinvolvement.Family Process, 43(4), 467-488.Atkins, D.C., Baucom, S. & Jacobson, N.S. (2001). Why do people have affairs? Resent research and future directions about attributions for extramarital involvement. In V. Manusov & J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Attribution, communication behaviour and close relationships (pp.305-319). New York: Cambridge University Press.Atwood, J. D. & Seifer, M. (1997). Extramarital affairs and constructed meanings: A social constructionist therapeutic approach. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(1), 55-75.Beach, S.R.H. &Tesser, A. (1988). Love in marriage: a cognitive account. In R.J. Stenberg & M. L. Barnes (Eds.), The Psychology of Love (pp.330-358). New Hevan, CT: Yale. Bonds-Raacke, J. M., Bearden, E. S., Carriere, N. J., Anderson, E. M. & Nicks, S. D. (2001). Engaging distortions: Are we idealizing marriage? Journal of Psychology, 135(2), 179- 184.Buunk, B. P., & Bakker, A. B. (1995). Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Sex Research, 32(4), 313-318. Burleson, B. R. & Denton, W. H. (1997). The relationship between communication skill and marital satisfaction: Some moderating effects. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 59(4), 884-902.Cramer, D. (2001).Consensus change, conflict, and relationship satisfaction in romantic relationships.Journal of Psychology, 135(3), 313-320.Cramer, D. (2003).Facilitativeness, conflict, demand, for approval, self-esteem, and satisfaction with romantic relationships.Journal of Psychology, 137(1), 85-98.Egan, V. & Angus, V. (2004).Personality and Individual Differences 36, 575–586.Erbek, E., Beştepe, E., Akar, H., Eradamlar, N. & Alpkan, R. L. (2005).Evlilik uyumu. [Marital Adjustment] Düşünen Adam, 18(1), 39-47. Dökmen, Ü. (1986). Yüz ifadeleri konusunda verilen eğitimin duygusal yüz ifadelerini teşhis becerisi ve iletişim çatışmalarına girme eğilimi üzerindeki etkisi [Tendency of Conflict] PhD dissertation,summary, Psikoloji Dergisi, 6, 21. Dökmen, Ü. (2001). İletişim çatışmaları ve empati [Conflicts in communication and emphaty]. İstan¬bul: SistemYayıncılık.Dökmen, Ü. (2002). İletişim Çatışmaları ve Empati. [Conflicts in communication and emphaty].İstanbul: SistemYayınlarıGordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H. &Snyder, D. K. (2004). An integrative intervention forpromoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,30(2), 213-232.Hamamcı, Z. (2005). Dysfunctional relationship belief in marital satisfaction and adjustment.Social Behavior and Personality, 33(4), 313- 328.Jones, G. D. & Nelson, E. S. (1997).Expectations of marriage among college students from intact and non-ıntact homes.Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 26(1-2), 171-189. Kantarcı, D. (2009). Evli Bireylerin Bağlanma Stillerine Göre Adatma Eğilimleri Ve Çatışma Yönetim Biçimlerinin İncelenmesi [Examining conflict styles and tendency to cheat among married individuals in the context of attachment]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Istanbul University, Istanbul.Koerner, A. F. & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2002). You never leave family in fight: The impact of family of origin on conflict-behaviour in romantic relationships. Communication Studies,53, 234-251.McCubbin, H., Larsen, A., & Olson, D. (1987). F-COPES Family crisis oriented personal evaluation scales. In H. I. McCubbin & A. I. Thompson (Eds.).Family assessment inventories for research and practice (pp. 193-207). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin –Madison.Lawson, A. & Samson, C. (1988).Age, gender and adultery.British Journal of Sociology, 39(3), 409-440.Locke, H. J., & Wallace, K. M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests:Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 251–255.MacGeorge, E. L., Graves, A. R., Feng, B. & Gillihan, S. J. (2004). The myth of gender cultures: Similarities outweigh differences in men's and women's provision of and responses to supportive communication. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 143-175.Malkoç, B. (2001). İletişim şekilleri ve evlilik uyumu arasındaki ilişki [A relationship between communication styles and marital adjustment]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Montgomery, B. M. (1981). The form and function of quality communication in marriage.Family Relations, 30, 21-30.Norment, L. (1998a). Infidelity: Why men cheat. Ebony, 54(1).Norment, L. (1998b). Infidelity II: Why women cheat. Ebony, 148.Polat, D. (2006). Evli bireylerin evlilik uyumları, aldatma eğilimleri ve çatışma eğilimleri arasındaki ilişkilerin bazıdeğişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examining the relationships between marital adjustment, tendency to conflict and cheat in the context of several variables among married individuals]. (Unpublished master’s thesis) Ankara University, Ankara.O’Leary, K. D. & Smith D. A. (1991).Marital interactions.Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 191- 192.Olson, M. M., Russell, C. S., Higgins-Kessler, M. & Miller, R. B. (2002).Emotional processes following of an extramarital affair.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28(4), 423-434.Özuğurlu, K. (1985). Evlilik raporu [The marriage report]. İstanbul: AltınKitaplarYayınevi.Tegin, B. (1990). Üniversite öğrencilerinin atılganlık davranış ve eğilimlerinin cinsiyet ve fakülte değişkenleri açısından incelenmesi [Examining the assertive behaviour in the context of gender and faculty related variables among university students]. PsikolojiDergisi, 7(25), 21-32.Sabatalli, R. M., Buck, R. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). A social relations analysis of nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples. Journal of Personality, 54 (3), 513-527.Sprecher, S. (1998).Social exchange theories and sexuality - the use of theory in research and scholarship on sexuality.Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 32-43.Veroff, J., Young, A.M. & Coon, H.M. (1997).The early years of marriage.In S. Duck (Ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationships (2.ed), (pp.431-450). New York: Wiley.Zusman, M. E.,, Gescheidler, J., Knox, D., & . McGinty, K. (2003). Dating manners among college students. Journal of the Indiana Academy of the Social Sciences. 7, 28-32.