HEMŞİRELİK İÇİN GÜÇ: BİREYSEL YENİLİKÇİLİK

Year 2021, Volume: 4 Issue: 1, 148 - 158, 30.05.2021

Ayşegül Yıldız , Seda Şahan , Sevil Şahin

https://doi.org/10.52538/iduhes.881830

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de hemşirelik hizmeti veren hemşirelerin yenilikçilik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Tanımlayıcı tipte yürütülen araştırmanın evrenini Türkiye’de çalışan 198.465 hemşire oluşturmaktadır. Evreni bilinen örneklem hesaplaması ile %90 güç için 271 hemşire örnekleme alınmıştır. Bu evrenden araştırma verileri için online anket sorularına 10-30 Ocak 2021 tarihleri arasında posta yoluyla cevap veren 210 kişi araştırmanın örneklemini oluşturmuştur. Verilerin toplanmasında Kişisel Bilgi Formu ve Bireysel Yenilikçilik Ölçeği (BYÖ) kullanılmıştır. Hemşirelerin BYÖ toplam puan ortalamaları 57,60±13,79’dur. BYÖ alt boyut puan ortalamalarında fikir önderliği alt boyutunda 23,01±4,82, değişime direnç alt boyutunda 17,98±4,97 ve risk alma alt boyutunda 6,78±1,53 olarak bulunmuştur. Hemşirelerin yenilikçilik düşüncelerinin geliştirilmesi ve harekete geçirilmesi için yenilikçilikle ilişkili bilimsel etkinliklere katılımları sağlanmalı ve bunun için uygun imkanlar geliştirilerek hemşirelikte meydana gelen yenilikçi değişimleri takip etmeleri teşvik edilmeli ve konu ile ilgili farkındalık kazandırılmalıdır.

Keywords

Bireysel yenilikçilik, güç, hemşirelik, yenilikçilik

POWER OF NURSING: INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION

Abstract

In this study, nurses working in Turkey was carried out to determine the properties of individual innovation.
The universe of the research conducted in the descriptive study is 198.465 nurses working in Turkey. 271 nurses were included in the sample for 90% power with the sample calculation with a known universe. 210 people from this universe, who answered the online questionnaire questions by mail between 10-30 January 2021, formed the sample of the study. Personal Information Form and Individual Innovativeness Scale (IIS) were used in data collection. Nurses' total IIS score mean is 57.60 ± 13.79. The mean scores of the IIS sub-dimension were found to be 23.01 ± 4.82 in the opinion leadership sub-dimension, 17.98 ± 4.97 in the resistance to change sub-dimension, and 6.78 ± 1.53 in the risk-taking sub-dimension. Nurses should be encouraged to participate in innovation-related scientific activities in order to develop and mobilize their innovative ideas, and appropriate opportunities should be developed for this, and they should be encouraged to follow innovative changes in nursing and raise awareness on the subject.

Keywords

individual innovation, innovation, nursing, power

References

• Reference 1 Anvik, C., Vedeler, J. S., Wegener, C., Slettebo, Å., & Odegård, A. (2020). Practice-based learning and innovation in nursing homes. Journal of Workplace Learning., 122-133.
• Reference 2 Baksi, A., Surucu, H. A., & Kurt, G. (2020). Nurses' Individual Innovative Behaviors and Investigation of the Factors Affecting These Behaviors. ACU Health Bil Journal, 11, 310-315.
• Reference 3 Bossato, H. R., Oliveira, R., Dutra, V., & Loyola, C. (2021). Nursing and the leading role of the user in the CAPS: a study from the constructionist perspective. 42, 56-61.
• Reference 4 Brysiewicz, P., Hughes, T. L., & McCreary, L. (2015). Promoting innovation in global nursing practice. 2(2), 41-45.
• Reference 5 Caputi, L. J. (2017). Innovation in nursing education revisited. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(3), 112.
• Reference 6 Clement‐O’Brien, K., Polit, D. F., & Fitzpatrick, J. (2011). Innovativeness of nurse leaders. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(4), 431-438.
• Reference 7 Cusson, R. M., Meehan, C., Bourgault, A., & Kelley, T. (2020). Educating the next generation of nurses to be innovators and change agents. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(2), 13-19.
• Reference 8 Celik, A. S., Bayrakceken, E., & Kilinc, T. (2020). Nurses' Individual Innovation Characteristics and Affecting Factors According to Gender Roles. Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 23(3), 397-409.
• Reference 9 Dall'Ora, C., & Dahlgren, A. (2020). Shift work in nursing: closing the knowledge gaps and advancing innovation in practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 112, 1-8.
• Reference 10 Dil, S., Uzun, M., & Aykanat, B. (2012). Innovation in nursing education. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(2), 1217-1228.
• Reference 11 Dy Bunpin, J., Chapman, S., Blegen, M., & Spetz, J. (2016). Differences in Innovative Behavior Among Hospital-Based Registered Nurses. 46(3), 122-127.
• Reference 12 Fiedler, R., Giddens, J., & North, S. (2014). Faculty experience of a technological innovation in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 35(6), 387-391.
• Reference 13 Gumussoy, S., Keskin, G., Yildirim, G. O., & Aktekin, E. (2017). The Importance of Innovative Approaches in Nursing. Press Academia Procedia, 3(1), 759-761.
• Reference 14 Gungor, G., & Goksu, A. (2019). Public Practice Innovation: The Case of Turkey,. In: Academic Platform, 1245-1254.
• Reference 15 Han, P., Moga, M.-A., Fitzpatrick, K., Brediger, S., & Allan, C. K. (2021). Innovations and Options for ECMO Simulation. In Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: ECMO Simulation, 63-70.
• Reference 16 Kaya, N., Turan, N., Aydin, G. O. (2015). A concept analysis of innovation in nursing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1674-1678.
• Reference 17 Kemer, A., & Altuntas, S. (2017). Adaptation of the Individual Innovation Scale to Nursing: A Turkish Validity and Reliability Study. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 14(1), 52-61.
• Reference 18 Kemer, A. S., & Yildiz, I. (2020). Determination of Nurses’ Individual Innovativeness Characteristics. 7(3), 363-370.
• Reference 19 Macduff, C., Marie Rafferty, A., Prendiville, A., Currie, K., Castro-Sanchez, E., King, C., Ledema, R. (2020). Fostering nursing innovation to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance using approaches from the arts and humanities. 25(3), 189-207.
• Reference 20 Planas‐Campmany, C., Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo, E., Violán, C., Pérez‐Sánchez, G., & Navas‐Palacios, J. (2020). Profile of Innovative Ideas Recorded by Nurses in an Ideas Bank of a Corporate Virtual Community of Open Innovation: A Cross‐Sectional Study. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(4), 426-434.
• Reference 21 Sarıköse, S., & Turkmen, E. (2020). The Relationship between Demographic and Occupational Variables, Transformational Leadership Perceptions, and Individual Innovativeness in Nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(5), 1126-1133.
• Reference 22 Sonmez, B., & Yildirim, A. (2014). Determining the innovative behaviors of nurses working in a university hospital and their views on the factors affecting their innovative behavior: A qualitative study. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 1(2), 49-59.
• Reference 23 Walker, R. M., Boorman, R. J., Vaux, A., Cooke, M., Aitken, L. M., & Marshall, A. P. (2020). Identifying barriers and facilitators to recognition and response to patient clinical deterioration by clinicians using a behaviour change approach: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 1-16.
• Reference 24 Weng, R. H., Chen, W. P., Huang, C. Y., Hung, C. H., & Hsu, C. (2016). Can nurse innovation improve customer perception of service quality and experience? , 25(13-14), 1950-1961.
• Reference 25 Yilmaz, F. T., Sen, H. T., & Demirkaya, F. (2014). Determining Innovative And Risk-Taking Behaviors Of Head Nurses . 3(3), 147-154.
• Reference 26 Zengin, H., Tiryaki, O., & Ciınar, N. (2019). Nursing Innovation and Related Factors. Journal of Health and Nursing Management, 6(3), 207-217.
• Reference 27 Zuber, C. D., & Moody, Q. (2018). Creativity and innovation in health care. Nursing administration quarterly, 42(1), 62-75.