Sosyal Bilimlerde Gözetim Toplumu Alanyazını: 1984-2023 Yılları Arasında Yayımlanmış Makaleler Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Çözümleme

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 321 - 340, 21.04.2025

Kübra Gökler

https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.1502835

Abstract

Amaç: Gözetim toplumu konusuna dair önemli yayınların yer aldığı Scopus veri tabanından çekilen verilerin bilimsel bir yaklaşımla tarihsel durumunu ortaya koymak, alandaki üretkenliği farklı değişkenler üzerinden açıklamak ve öncü durumda olan kaynak ve yazarları sunmak amaçlanmaktadır.
Yöntem: Scopus veri tabanı üzerinden sosyal bilimler alanındaki gözetim toplumu literatürünün dönüşümü bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmiş, literatürün etki ve üretkenliği farklı temalar üzerinden ortaya konmuştur. Bu temalar; yazarların, ülkelerin ve dergilerin üretkenlik düzeyleri, anahtar kelime kullanım durumu, en fazla ortak atıf alan yazarlardır. İnceleme VOSwiever programı ile yapılmıştır.
Bulgular: Toplam 585 İngilizce makale üzerinden yapılan bibliyometrik analizin sonucuna göre; gözetim toplumu konusuna yönelik literatürün 1984-2007 yılları arasında istikrarlı bir gelişim gösterdiği ve 2008 itibari ile yükselişe geçtiği görülmüştür. Literatüre ABD ve Birleşik Krallık’ın hakim olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Sonuç: Sonuç olarak son zamanlarda sosyal bilimler alanında gözetim toplumu konulu çalışmaların sayısının arttığı ve çalışma başlıklarının ise çeşitlendiği görülmüştür.

Keywords

Sosyal Bilimler, Gözetim, Gözetim Toplumu, Bibliyometri, Bibliyometrik Analiz, VOSviewer

Surveillance Society Literature in Social Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis on Articles Published between 1984-2023

Abstract

Purpose: The aim is to present the historical status of the data extracted from the Scopus database, which includes important publications on the subject of surveillance society, with a scientific approach, to explain the productivity in the field through different variables, and to present the leading sources and authors.
Method: The transformation of the surveillance society literature in the field of social sciences was examined through the Scopus database using the bibliometric analysis method, and the impact and productivity of the literature were revealed through different themes. These themes are; productivity levels of authors, countries and journals, keyword usage status, and the authors with the most common citations. The examination was conducted with the VOSwiever program.
Findings: According to the results of the bibliometric analysis conducted on a total of 585 English articles; it was observed that the literature on the subject of surveillance society showed a stable development between 1984-2007 and started to rise as of 2008. It was determined that the USA and the United Kingdom dominated the literature.
Conclusion: As a result, it was observed that the number of studies on surveillance society in the field of social sciences has increased recently and the study titles have diversified.

Keywords

Social Sciences, Surveillance, Surveillance Society, Bibliometrics, Bibliometric Analysis, VOSviewer

References

• AUGUSTO, F. R., & SİMÕES, M. J. (2017). To See And Be Seen, To Know And Be Known: Perceptions And Prevention Strategies On Facebook Surveillance. Social Science Information, 56(4), 596-618.
• ANDRÉS, A. (2009). Measuring Academic Research: How To Undertake A Bibliometric Study. UK: Chandos Publishing.
• AL, U. vd., (2010). Bibliyometrik Özellikleri Açısından Bilig’in Değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 55, 1-20.
• ALLMER, T. (2011). Critical Surveillance Studies in The İnformation Society. Triplec: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal For A Global Sustainable Information Society, 9(2), 566-592.
• ALSHARIF, A. H. vd., (2020). Bibliometric Analysis. Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948-2962.
• BELTER, C. W. (2015). Bibliometric İndicators: Opportunities And Limits. Journal Of The Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(4), 219.
• BOZKURT, V. (2000). Gözetim ve İnternet: Özel yaşamının sonu mu?. Birikim Dergisi, Ağustos sayısı, İstanbul: Birim Yayınları.
• CHEN, X. Vd., (2018). A Comparative Quantitative Study of Utilizing Artificial İntelligence On Electronic Health Records İn The USA And China During 2008–2017. BMC Medical İnformatics And Decision Making, 18(5), 55-69.
• CHEN, X vd., (2018). A Bibliometric Analysis of Event Detection in Social Media. Online Information Review, 43(1), 29-52.
• CHOUDHRİ, A. F. vd., (2015). Understanding Bibliometric Parameters And Analysis. Radiographics, 35(3), 736-746.
• COBO, M. J vd., (2011). An Approach for Detecting, Quantifying, And Visualizing The Evolution Of A Research Field: A Practical Application To The Fuzzy Sets Theory Field. Journal Of İnformetrics, 5(1), 146-166.
• COBO, M. J. Vd., (2015). 25 Years At Knowledge-Based Systems: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3-13.
• DOLGUN, U. (2004). Gözetim Toplumunun Yükselişi: Enformasyon Toplumundan Gözetim Toplumuna. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 55-74.
• DOLGUN, U. (2005). Çalışma Yaşamında Gözetim. In Journal Of Social Policy Conferences (49).
• DURİEUX, V., & GEVENOİS, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric İndicators: Quality Measurements Of Scientific Publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342-351.,
• ELLİS, D vd., (2016). Experiencing The ‘Surveillance Society’. Psychologist, 29(9), 682-685.
• ELLİS, D., TUCKER, I., & HARPER, D. (2013). The Affective Atmospheres of Surveillance. Theory & Psychology, 23(6), 716-731.
• GANDY Jr, O. H. (1989). The Surveillance Society: Information Technology And Bureaucratic Social Control. Journal Of Communication, 39(3), 61-76.
• GAVİRİA-MARİN, M vd., (2019). Knowledge Management: AGlobal Examination Based on Bibliometric Analysis. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 140, 194-220.
• LAHLOU, S. (2008). Identity, Social Status, Privacy And Face-Keeping in Digital Society. Social Science İnformation, 47(3), 299-330.
• LAWANİ, S. M. (1981). Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods And Applications. Libri, 31(Jahresband), 294-315.
• LEWİSON, G., & Devey, M. E. (1999). Bibliometric Methods For The Evaluation Of Arthritis Research. Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 38(1), 13-20.
• MARTÍNEZ, M. A vd.(2015). Analyzing The Scientific Evolution of Social Work Using Science Mapping. Research On Social Work Practice, 25(2), 257-277.
• MARX, G. T. (2004). What’s New About The “New Surveillance”?: Classifying for Change And Continuity. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 17(1), 18-37.
• MARX, G. T. (2015). Surveillance Studies. International Encyclopedia of The Social & Behavioral Sciences, 23(2), 733-741.
• MERİGÓ, J. M., & YANG, J. B. (2017). A Bibliometric Analysis of Operations Research And Management Science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
• NARİN, F., & HAMİLTON, K. S.(1996).Bibliometric Performance Measures. Scientometrics, 36(3), 293-310.
• OKUBO, Y. (1997). Bibliometric İndicators And Analysis Of Research Systems: Methods And Examples.
• STALDER, F., & LYON, D. (2003). Electronic İdentity Cards And Social Classification. Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk And Digital Discrimination. 77-93.
• SUVACI, B. (2016). Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabaninda Yayımlanan Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Makalelerinin Bibliyometrik Profili. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (25), 263-281.
• TİMAN, T., &OUDSHOORN, N. (2012). Mobile Cameras as New Technologoies of Surveillance? How Citizens Experience The Use of Mobile Cameras İn Public Nightscapes. Surveillance &Society, 10(2), 167-181.
• TÜMURTÜRKAN, M. (2010). Gündelik Hayatın Gözetimi: ’’Panoptikon Toplumu’’. Ethos: Felsefe Ve Toplumsal Bilimlerde Diyaloglar. 2(3), 1-19.
• VAN DER PLOEG, I. (2003). Biometrics And The Body as İnformation. Lyon, D. (Ed) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk And Digital Discrimination, (Pp. 57-72). Routledge.
• WALLİN, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls And Possibilities. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 97(5), 261-275.
• WELLER, T. (2012). The İnformation State: An Historical Perspective n Surveillance. Ball, K., Haggerty., K.D., Lyon, D. (Ed). Routledge Handbook Of Surveillance Studies (S. 57-63).Routledge.
• WOOD, D. M. vd.,(2006). A Report on The Surveillance Society. Surveillance Studies Network, UK, 1-98.,
• WOOD, D. M. vd., (2006). A Report on The Surveillance Society. Surveillance Studies Network, UK, 1-98.
• ZUPİC, I., & ČATER, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472.
• URL: https://www.vosviewer.com/