Evaluation of Queen Bee Production in Turkey

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 104 - 107, 19.11.2015

Murat Emir

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to determine the current situation of the queen bee production in Turkey. In accordance with this objective, we will suggest solutions by dealing with queen bee production capacity by country and the situation of queen bee producers. The main data contain numerous related studies conducted in Turkey and other countries. This study reviews this field studies and synthesis them to reach general deductions. The performance of the queen bee affects the performance of the colony. The quality of the queen bee is extremely important in honey yield of the colony. Honey yield of Turkey per colony is only 14 kg in 2014; the queen bee factor is among the major causes of low yield. The annual capacity of 104 queen bee producers authorized by ministry is about 351 thousands of queen bees. These producers are active in 28 provinces of the country. Consequently, the annual queen bee production capacity does not meet the requirements of seven million colonies in the country. There are no studies available on the ability of existing queen bee production facilities to increase their capacity and capital requirements. In addition, no feasibility study was carried out to establish new queen bee production facility. Moreover, there are no studies including the technical and economic activities of queen bee producers in Turkey at enterprise level.Data-based answers should be analyzed to meet this need by calculating the existing bee producers’ capacity expansion trends and additional investment costs needed by the existing beekeeping enterprises in queen bee production.

Keywords

Honey bee (Apis mellifera L), queen bee, beekeeping, production capacity, Turkey

Türkiye’de Ana Arı Üretiminin Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, Türkiye'de ana arı üretiminin mevcut durumunu tespit etmektir. Bu amaç çerçevesinde ülkemiz ana arı üretim kapasitesi ve üreticilerin durumuna ilişkin çözümler önerilecektir. Çalışmanın ana veri kaynağı, Türkiye ve diğer ülkelerde yapılan ilgili çalışmalardır. Bu çalışma, bu alanda yapılan çalışmaları gözden geçirerek genel çıkarımlara ulaşmak için sentezlemiştir. Ana arının performansı koloni performansını etkilemektedir. Ana arının kalitesi, koloni bal veriminde son derece önemlidir. Türkiye'nin koloni başına bal verimi 2014 yılında sadece 14 kg olurken, düşük verimin önemli nedenlerinden biri ana arı faktörüdür. Bakanlık tarafından yetkilendirilmiş 104 ana arı üreticisinin toplam yıllık kapasitesi 351 bin adettir. Bu üreticiler, ülkenin 28 ilinde faaliyet göstermektedirler. Türkiye genelinde yedi milyonu aşan koloni bulunmasından dolayı mevcut üreticilerin yıllık 351 bin ana arı üretim kapasitesi yeterli olmamaktadır. Türkiye’de ana arı üreticilerinin teknik ve ekonomik faaliyetlerini içeren işletme düzeyinde çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Ayrıca ana arı üretiminde üretici unsurları ve kalitesi konusunda yeterince çalışma mevcut değildir. Bunun yanında mevcut ana arı üretim işletmelerinin kapasitelerini artırabilme kabiliyeti ve sermaye gereksinimi üzerine çalışmalar bulunmamaktadır. Belirtilen ihtiyaca mevcut ana arı üreticilerinin kapasite artırım eğilimleri ve mevcut arıcılık işletmelerinin ana arı üreticiliği için ihtiyaç duyacağı ilave yatırım maliyetinin hesaplanması ile veriye dayalı yanıt aranmalıdır.

Keywords

Bal arısı (Apis mellifera L), ana arı, arıcılık, üretim kapasitesi, Türkiye

References

• Akyol E., Korkmaz A., Yeninar H and Çakmak İ., 2008. An observation study on the effects of queen age on some characteristics of honeybee colonies. Italian Journal and Animal Sciences, 7(1): 19-25.
• Arslan S and Hamgir B. 2010. The effects of different colony population sized queenright & queenless starting colonies and rearing season on queen bee (apis mellifera l.) quality and rearing parameters. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpasa University, 27(2): 81-88.
• Emir M., 2015. Exploring the socio economic structure of beekeepers and their production efficiency in Turkey. PhD Thesis. Ondokuz Mayis University Department of Agricultural Economics, Samsun.
• Erkan C and Aşkın Y., 2001. The structure and activities of beekeeping in Bahçesaray, Van. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 11(1): 19-28.
• Fıratlı Ç., 2007. Breeding queen bee in Turkey. Beekeeping Seminar in Aegean, 15-16 February, İzmir.
• Fıratlı Ç., Genç F., Karacaoglu M and Gençer HV., 2000. Comparative analysis of beekeeping in Turkey, problems and suggestions. Turkey Agricultural Engineering V. Technically Congress, 17-21 January, Ankara.
• Gencer HV. and Fıratlı Ç., 1999. Morphological characteristics of the Central Anatolian (A. m. anatoliaca) and Caucasian (A. m. caucasica) honey bees. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 23(1): 107-113.
• Genç F., Emsen B and Dodologlu A., 2005. Effects of rearing period and grafting method on the queen bee rearing. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 27(1): 45-48.
• Guler A., 2010. A morphometric model for determining the effect of commercial queen bee usage on the native honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) population in a Turkish province. Apidologie, 41(6): 622-635.
• Güler A., 2006. Instrumental insemination in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) and its importance for Turkey. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Faculty of Agriculture, 21(3): 370-378.
• Güler A and Alpay H., 2005. Reproductive characteristics of some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) genotypes. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 4: 864-870.
• Güler A and Toy H., 2013. Relationship between dead pupa removal and season and productivity of honey bee Apis mellifera, Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 37: 462-467.
• Harbo JR. 1986. Oviposition rates of instrumentally inseminated and naturally mated queen honeybees
• (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 79: 112-115.
• Kutlu MA., 2014. Determining the current status of Gaziantep province its beekeeping problems and solutions. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 1(4): 481-484.
• Linksvayer TA., Kaftanoglu O., Akyol E., Blatch S., Amdam GV and Page RE., 2011. Larval and nurse worker control of developmental plasticity and the evolution of honey bee queen–worker dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 24: 1939-1948.
• Morse RA., 1979. Rearing Queen Honey Bees. New York, USA: Wicwas Press.
• Oskay D., 2008. Protecting diversity of native honey bee subspecies, developing a model on colony management and breeding. Uludag Bee Journal 8(2): 63-72.
• Ozturk AI., 2014. Quality concept in honey bee queen and factors affecting of the its quality. Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute, 24(1): 59-65.
• Şahinler N and Kaftanoğlu O., 1997. The effects of the eggs and larvae transfer on the quality of queen honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 2(1): 123-138.
• Wen X., Li X., Gao L and Sang H., 2014. Honey bees mating optimization algorithm for process planning problem. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 25: 459–472.
• Woyke J., 1967. Rearing conditions and the number of sperms reaching the spermatecha. XXI. International Apiculture Congress of Apimondia, Bucharest, Romania.
• Woyke J. 1971. Correlation between the age at which honeybee brood was grafted characteristics of resultant queen and insemination. Journal of Apicultural Research, 10(1): 45-55.
• Yalçın FÇ., 2014. The production of honey and other bee products and the potantial of organic production in the enterprises engaged in beekeeping in the central district of Tokat Province. Ms Thesis, Gaziosmanpasa University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Tokat.
• Zhdanova TS., 1967. Influence of nest temperature on quality of queens produced artificially. XXI. International Apiculture Congress of Apimondia, Bucharest, Romania.