METAL BIOACCUMULATION/TOXICITY TEST FOR METAL INDUSTRY WASTEWATERS

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 1 - 5, 02.01.2018

Zeynep Cansu Ayturan , Fatma Kunt , Sukru Dursun

Abstract

Metal industry wastewaters include different types of heavy metals with respect to the metal production processes and products. There are several methods used for metal production industry such as refining and smelting operations. Both may produce air emissions like SO2 and particulate matter, wastewater originating from floatation and leachate, and other wastes like sludge and slag. Heavy metals of metal industry wastewaters are nickel, brass, chrome, gold, cadmium, copper, brass, and silver. Most of them may give severe damage to human and environment. For example, chrome ion leads to lung cancer, stomach ulcer, kidney and liver function disorders and death on human. Thus, heavy metal containing wastewaters could be very dangerous. Besides, plant species which have capability of accumulate heavy metals can be an option to bioaccumulate metal industry wastewaters while plant species which are sensitive to heavy metals can be used as a plant for phytotoxicity tests. In this study metal industry wastewaters were analysed in order to determine plant species whether they are sensitive or tolerant to heavy metals. During analysis phytotoxicity tests were conducted with different plant species.

Keywords

Metal Wastewaters, Bioaccumulation, Heavy Metals, Toxicity

References

• [1] Chapter 82 - Metal Processing and Metal Working Industry, web page: http://www.ilocis.org/documents/chpt82e.htm, retrieval date: 06/02/2017.
• [2] Jarup, L., 2003, Hazards of heavy metal contamination, British Medical Bulletin, Vol. 68, 167–182.
• [3] Aduseyi, A.A., Njoku, K.L., Akinola, M.O., 2015, Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Soils and Vegetation around Selected Industries in Lagos State, Nigeria, Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 3, 11-19.
• [4] European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, 2014, Phytotoxicity assessment, Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 44 (3), 265–273.
• [5] Baumgarten, A., Spiegel, H., 2004, Phytotoxicity (Plant tolerance), Horizontal Acknowledgement, web page: https://www.ecn.nl/docs/society/horizontal/hor8_phytotoxicity.pdf, retrieval date: 06/02/2017.
• [6] ISO 11269-2, 2012, Soil quality — Determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora — Part 2: Effects of contaminated soil on the emergence and early growth of higher plants, web page: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:11269:-2:ed-3:v1:en, retrieval date: 02/02/2017.
• [7] Proposal for Updating Guideline 208, 2003, OECD Guideline for The Testing of Chemicals, web page: http://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/33653757.pdf, retrieval date: 02/02/2017.
• [8] OECD 208: Terrestrial Plant Test - Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test, web page: https://www.ibacon.com/your-study-type/terrestrial-ecotoxicology/non-target-plants/oecd-208-terrestrial-plant-test-seedling, retrieval date: 02/02/2017.
• [9] Mojiri, A., 2011, The Potential of Corn (Zea mays) for Phytoremediation of Soil Contaminated with Cadmium and Lead, J. Biol. Environ. Sci., 5(13), 17-22.
• [10] Tiecher, T.L., Cerreta, C.A., Ferreira, P.A.A., Lourenzi, C.R., Tiecher, T., Girotto, E., Nicoloso, F.T., Soriani, H.H., De Conti, L., Mimmo, T., Cesco, S., Brunetto, G., 2016, The Potential of Zea mays L. in remediating copper and zinc contaminated soils for grapevine production, Geoderma 262, 52-61.
• [11] Miller, R.L., Brewer, J.D., 2003, The A-Z of Social Research: A Dictionary of Key Social Science Research Concepts, SAGE Publications Ltd., pp 09-12.
• [12] Mourato M.P., Moreira I.N., Leitão, I., Pinto, F.R., Sales, J.R., Martins, L.L., 2015, Effect of Heavy Metals in Plants of the Genus Brassica, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 16, 17975-17998.
• [13] Rashid, A., Mahmood, T., Mehmood, F., Khalid, A., Saba1, B., Batool, A., Riaz, A., 2014, Phytoaccumulation, Competitive Adsorption and Evaluation of Chelators-Metal Interaction in Lettuce Plant, Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, Vol.13, No. 10, 2583-2592.
• [14] Smolinska, B., Szczodrowska, A., 2016, Antioxidative response of Lepidium Sativum L. during assisted phytoremediation of Hg contaminated soil, New Biotechnology, article in press.
• [15] Arienzo, M., Adamo, P., Cozzolino, V., 2004, The potential of Lolium perenne for revegetation of contaminated soil from a metallurgical site, The Science of the Total Environment 319,13–25.
• [16] Wani, P.A., Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., 2008, Effects of Heavy Metal Toxicity on Growth, Symbiosis, Seed yield and Metal Uptake in Pea Grown in Metal Amended Soil, Bulletin Environmental Contamination Toxicology, 81, 152–158.
• [17] López-Millán, A.F., Sagardoy, R., Solanas, M., Abadía, A., Abadía, J., 2009, Cadmium toxicity in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants grown in hydroponics, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 65, 376-385.
• [18] Das, S., Mazumbar, K., 2016, Phytoremediation potential of a novel fern, Salvinia Cucullata, Roxb. Ex Bory, to pulp and paper mill effluent: Physiological and Anatomical Response, Chemosphere, 163, 62-72.
• [19] Pathak, C., Chopra, A.K., Srivastava, S., 2013, Accumulation of heavy metals in Spinacia oleracea irrigated with paper mill effluent and sewage, Environmental Monitoring Assessment 185, 7343–7352.
• [20] Bidar, G., Garçon, G., Pruvot, C., Dewaele, D., Cazier, F., Douay, F., Shirali, P., 2007, Behavior of Trifolium repens and Lolium perenne growing in a heavy metal contaminated field: Plant metal concentration and phytotoxicity, Environmental Pollution 147, 546-553.