BibTex RIS Cite

Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement

Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 83 - 87, 11.06.2015
https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105718

Abstract

In this paper, aerodynamic performance of airplane NACA 2415 airfoils were numerically investigated to understand effect of angle of attack on the aerodynamic performance. The lift and drag coefficient, lift to drag ratio and power coefficients around NACA 2415 aerofoil were calculated with SST turbulence model and are compared with two different experimental data to validate simulation accuracy of Computational Fluid Dynamics approach. Result indicates that at the low angle of attack, the lift coefficient of NACA 2415 aerofoil obtained in the present study is in a good agreement with experimental results but after zero degree agreement is not good with experimental results.

References

  • H.Sogukpinar, I. Bozkurt, “Calculation of Optimum Angle of Attack to Determine Maximum Lift to Drag Ratio of NACA 632-215 Airfoil”, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 1103-1108, 2015.
  • M. Ghods, “Theory of Wings and Wind Tunnel Testing of A NACA 2415 Airfoil, Technical Communication for Engineers”, The University of British Columbia, July 23, 2001.
  • S. Rajakumar, D. Ravindran, “Iterative approach for optimizing coefficient of power, coefficient of lift and drag of wind turbine rotor”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 38, pp. 83-93, 2012.
  • A. Zanotti, R. Nilifard, G. Gibertini, A. Guardone, G. Quaranta, “Assessment of 2D/3D numerical modeling for deep dynamic stall experiments”, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 51, pp. 97–115, 2014.
  • M. J. Hoffmann, R. Reuss Ramsay, G.M. Gregorek, “Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the NACA 4415 Airfoil”, Airfoil Performance Report, NREL/TP-442-7815, 1996.
  • C. Thumthae, T. Chitsomboon, “Optimal angle of attack for untwisted blade wind turbine”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp. 1279–1284, 2009. [7]COMSOL CFD module user guide http://www.comsol.com, 2015.
  • N.J. Eastman, E.W. Kenneth, R.M Pinkerton, “The characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from test in the variable-density wind tunnel”, NACA report no: 460,1932.
Year 2015, Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 83 - 87, 11.06.2015
https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105718

Abstract

References

  • H.Sogukpinar, I. Bozkurt, “Calculation of Optimum Angle of Attack to Determine Maximum Lift to Drag Ratio of NACA 632-215 Airfoil”, Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 1103-1108, 2015.
  • M. Ghods, “Theory of Wings and Wind Tunnel Testing of A NACA 2415 Airfoil, Technical Communication for Engineers”, The University of British Columbia, July 23, 2001.
  • S. Rajakumar, D. Ravindran, “Iterative approach for optimizing coefficient of power, coefficient of lift and drag of wind turbine rotor”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 38, pp. 83-93, 2012.
  • A. Zanotti, R. Nilifard, G. Gibertini, A. Guardone, G. Quaranta, “Assessment of 2D/3D numerical modeling for deep dynamic stall experiments”, Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 51, pp. 97–115, 2014.
  • M. J. Hoffmann, R. Reuss Ramsay, G.M. Gregorek, “Effects of Grit Roughness and Pitch Oscillations on the NACA 4415 Airfoil”, Airfoil Performance Report, NREL/TP-442-7815, 1996.
  • C. Thumthae, T. Chitsomboon, “Optimal angle of attack for untwisted blade wind turbine”, Renewable Energy, Vol. 34, pp. 1279–1284, 2009. [7]COMSOL CFD module user guide http://www.comsol.com, 2015.
  • N.J. Eastman, E.W. Kenneth, R.M Pinkerton, “The characteristics of 78 related airfoil sections from test in the variable-density wind tunnel”, NACA report no: 460,1932.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Haci Sogukpinar

İsmail Bozkurt

Publication Date June 11, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 1 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Sogukpinar, H., & Bozkurt, İ. (2015). Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, 1(2), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105718
AMA Sogukpinar H, Bozkurt İ. Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement. IJET. June 2015;1(2):83-87. doi:10.19072/ijet.105718
Chicago Sogukpinar, Haci, and İsmail Bozkurt. “Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing With the Experimental Measurement”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1, no. 2 (June 2015): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105718.
EndNote Sogukpinar H, Bozkurt İ (June 1, 2015) Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1 2 83–87.
IEEE H. Sogukpinar and İ. Bozkurt, “Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement”, IJET, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–87, 2015, doi: 10.19072/ijet.105718.
ISNAD Sogukpinar, Haci - Bozkurt, İsmail. “Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing With the Experimental Measurement”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET 1/2 (June 2015), 83-87. https://doi.org/10.19072/ijet.105718.
JAMA Sogukpinar H, Bozkurt İ. Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement. IJET. 2015;1:83–87.
MLA Sogukpinar, Haci and İsmail Bozkurt. “Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing With the Experimental Measurement”. International Journal of Engineering Technologies IJET, vol. 1, no. 2, 2015, pp. 83-87, doi:10.19072/ijet.105718.
Vancouver Sogukpinar H, Bozkurt İ. Calculation of Aerodynamic Performance Characteristics of Airplane Wing and Comparing with the Experimental Measurement. IJET. 2015;1(2):83-7.

88x31.png Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)