EXPLORING THE REFLECTION OF THE DEFINITIONAL PROBLEM OF TERRORISM IN PUBLIC OPINION USING WIKIPEDIA DATA

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 123 - 148, 31.12.2024

Ahmet Yiğitalp Tulga

Abstract

Terrorism is a global issue, particularly after the 9/11 attacks in the United States. Despite the global attention, there is no common definition of terrorism, as what one country defines as a terrorist is considered a freedom fighter by another. However, the impact of a country's attitude towards such organizations on people's perceptions and discourse has not been thoroughly explored. Accordingly, this study examines Wikipedia content related to the People's Defense Units (YPG), an organization recognized as a terrorist entity by some countries but not defined as such by others. Turkish Wikipedia content about YPG, representing Türkiye, which recognizes YPG as a terrorist organization, is compared with English Wikipedia content about YPG, a viewpoint held by countries like the USA and the UK, which do not recognize it as a terrorist organization. Additionally, Turkish and English content related to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), recognized as a terrorist organization worldwide, is also examined using the sentiment analysis. The analysis reveals that the dominant sentiment in Turkish Wikipedia content related to YPG, representing Türkiye that recognizes YPG as a terrorist organization, is negative, while the dominant sentiment in English Wikipedia content is positive. Conversely, the prevalent emotion in both Turkish and English Wikipedia content about ISIS, universally acknowledged as a terrorist organization, is negative. In summary, the study finds that the attitudes and opinions of countries towards an organization are reflected in society, and the public's attitude towards the organization in the country they reside in also influences the discourse about that organization.

Keywords

Wikipedia, Terrorism, People, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Sentiment Analysis

References

• Agerberg, M., & Sohlberg, J. (2021). Personal proximity and reactions to terrorism. Comparative Political Studies, 54(14), 2512-2545.
• Alexander, Y. (1976). International terrorism: National, regional, and global perspectives. New York: Praeger Publishing.
• Aven, T., & Guikema, S. (2015). On the concept and definition of terrorism risk. Risk analysis, 35(12), 2162-2171.
• Balzacq, T. (2011). Violence and expressive rationalization. Thoughts on critical studies of terrorism. Les Champs de Mars, 22(2), 51-84.
• Bjørkheim, A. S. (2020). One terrorism to rule them all: Turkey, the PKK and global terrorism discourse. Journal of International Relations and Development, 23(3), 487-510.
• Braithwaite, A. (2013). The logic of public fear in terrorism and counter terrorism. Journal of police and criminal psychology, 28(2), 95-101.
• Butko, T. J. (2009). Four perspectives on terrorism: Where they stand depends on where you sit. Political Studies Review, 7(2), 185-194.
• Bux, S., & Coyne, S. (2009). A narrative account of the wider impact of the 7 July 2005 London bomb attacks. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1(2), 24-36.
• Buzan, B. (2006). Will the 'global war on terrorism'be the new Cold War?. International affairs, 82(6), 1101-1118.
• Corlett, J. A. (2004). Terrorism: A philosophical analysis (Vol. 101). Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht: Kluwer
• Çubukcu, S., & Forst, B. (2018). Measuring terrorism. Homicide Studies, 22(1), 94-116.
• D’Orazio, V., & Salehyan, I. (2018). Who is a terrorist? Ethnicity, group affiliation, and understandings of political violence. International Interactions, 44(6), 1017-1039.
• Deewanee, A. (2022). The Democratic Union Party (PYD) and People's Protection Units (YPG) in Turkish Official Discourse. World Affairs, 185(1), 59-90.
• Desmarais, S. L., Simons-Rudolph, J., Brugh, C. S., Schilling, E., & Hoggan, C. (2017). The state of scientific knowledge regarding factors associated with terrorism. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 4(4), 180.
• Elkins, K., & Chun, J. (2019). Can Sentiment Analysis Reveal Structure in a Plotless Novel?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01441.
• Ficamos, P. & Liu, Y. (2016) “A topic based approach for sentiment analysis on twitter data”, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(12), 201-205.
• Freilich, J. D., Chermak, S. M., & Simone Jr, J. (2009). Surveying American state police agencies about terrorism threats, terrorism sources, and terrorism definitions. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(3), 450-475.
• Gezici, G., & Yanıkoğlu, B. (2018). Sentiment analysis in Turkish. Turkish natural language processing, 1(1), 255-271.
• Giannakidou, A. (2011). Nonveridicality and mood choice: subjunctive, polarity, and time. Tense across languages, 1(1), 59-90.
• Greving, H., Oeberst, A., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2018). Emotional content in Wikipedia articles on negative man-made and nature-made events. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37(3), 267-287.
• Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 97-115.
• Harbi, A. & Kamsin, A. B. (2021) “An effective text classifier using machine learning for identifying tweets’ polarity concerning terrorist connotation”, Information Technology and Computer Science, 5(1), 19-29.
• Hewitt, C. (1990). Terrorism and public opinion: A five country comparison. Terrorism and Political Violence, 2(2), 145-170.
• Hoffman, B. (2006). Insurgency and counterinsurgency in Iraq. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29(2), 103-121.
• Homolar, A., & Merino, P. (2019). Making sense of terrorism: A narrative approach to the study of violent events. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(4), 561-581.
• Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining opinion features in customer reviews. AAAI. 4(4), 755-760.
• Huff, C., & Kertzer, J. D. (2018). How the public defines terrorism. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 55-71.
• Jackson, R. (2012). The study of terrorism 10 years after 9/11: Successes, issues, challenges. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 8(32), 1-16.
• Jenkins, B. (1975). International terrorism: A balance sheet. Survival, 17(4), 158-164.
• Jockers, M. (2020). Package ‘syuzhet’. Retrieve from Retrieve from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet/syuzhet.pdf
• Jones, F. D., & Fong, Y. H. (1994). Military psychiatry and terrorism. Military psychiatry: preparing in peace for war, 1(1), 263-269.
• Jones, F. D., & Fong, Y. H. (1994). Military psychiatry and terrorism. Military Psychiatry: Preparing in Peace for War. Office of Surgeon General, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research: Washington, DC, 263-269.
• Kantorowicz, J., Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, E., & de Vries, G. (2023). Public perception of terrorism attacks: A conjoint experiment. Journal of peace research, 12(4), 00223433231200922.
• Kennedy-Pipe, C., & Rengger, N. (2006). Apocalypse now? Continuities or disjunctions in world politics after 9/11. International Affairs, 82(3), 539-552.
• LaFree, G., Morris, N. A., & Dugan, L. (2010). Cross-national patterns of terrorism: Comparing trajectories for total, attributed and fatal attacks, 1970–2006. The British Journal of Criminology, 50(4), 622-649.
• Laqueur, W. (1986). Reflections on terrorism. Foreign Aff., 65(1), 86-95.
• Lim, S. (2009). How and why do college students use Wikipedia?. Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 60(11), 2189-2202.
• Locatelli, A. (2014), "What is terrorism? Concepts, definitions and classifications", Understanding Terrorism, 22(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-8323(2014)0000022001
• Löbner, S. (2000). Polarity in natural language: Predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences. Linguistics and philosophy, 23, 213-308.
• Manning, J., & Kunkel, A. (2014). Making meaning of meaning-making research: Using qualitative research for studies of social and personal relationships. Journal of social and personal relationships, 31(4), 433-441.
• McCormick, G. H. (2003). Terrorist decision making. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 473-507.
• Miller, S., & Feltes, J. (2021). The definition of terrorism. In Counter-Terrorism (pp. 24-34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Misuraca, L., Caliò, A., Grillo, I., Grélard, A., Oger, P. M., Peters, J., & Demé, B. (2020). Sentiment Analysis for Education with R: packages, methods and practical applications. Langmuir, 36(45), 13516-13526.
• Mitts, T., Phillips, G. & Walter, B. F. (2022) “Studying the impact of ISIS propaganda campaigns”, The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1220-1225.
• Mulki, H., Alabdullah, S., Halil, A., Al-Ali, N., Kyriakidou, M. & Stavinoha, L. (2023) “Online toxicity against Syrians in Turkish Twitter: Analysis and implications”, International Journal of Communication, 18, 28.
• Nacos, B. L. (2000). Accomplice or witness? The media's role in terrorism. Current History, 99(636), 174-178.
• Nacos, B. L. (2005). The portrayal of female terrorists in the media: Similar framing patterns in the news coverage of women in politics and in terrorism. Studies in conflict & terrorism, 28(5), 435-451.
• Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in information retrieval, 2(1–2), 1-135.
• Piazza, J. A. (2007). Draining the swamp: Democracy promotion, state failure, and terrorism in 19 Middle Eastern countries. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 30(6), 521-539.
• Prabha, K. (2000). Defining terrorism. Strategic Analysis, 24(1), 125-135.
• Primoratz, I. (2013). Terrorism is almost always morally unjustified, but it may be justified as the only way of preventing a “moral disaster”. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
• Republic of Turkey Ministry of Internat Affairs. (2017). TÜRKİYE’NİN DEAŞ İLE MÜCADELESİ. Ankara. Retrieved from: https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/strateji/yeni yayinlar
• Richards, A. (2014). Conceptualizing terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 37(3), 213-236.
• Salih, C. (2015). Divided Kurds fight the Islamic State. The Islamic State through the regional lens, 1(1), 57-63.
• Salihi, E., & Göksun, Y. (2018). DEAŞ’ın Medya Stratejisi. SETA Rapor, İstanbul, SETA Yayınları, 9-10.
• Schmid, A. (2005). Terrorism as psychological warfare. Democracy and Security, 1(2), 137-146.
• Schuurman, B. (2013). Topics in terrorism research: reviewing trends and gaps, 2007-2016. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(3), 463-480.
• Schuurman, B. (2020). Research on terrorism, 2007–2016: A review of data, methods, and authorship. Terrorism and Political Violence, 32(5), 1011-1026.
• Sheehan, I. S. (2012). Mapping contemporary terrorism courses at top-ranked national universities and liberal arts colleges in the United States. Perspectives on Terrorism, 6(2), 19-50.
• Spencer, D. E. (2010). Reexamining the relevance of Mao to post-modern insurgency and terrorism. American Intelligence Journal, 28(1), 146-152.
• Tulga, A. Y. (2020). The role of mass media in terrorism and its effect on individuals. İnsan ve İnsan, 7(25), 47-64.
• Tulga, A. Y. (2022) “New Page in Terrorism: An Explanation of The Soft Terrorism Concept With ISIS Case In Turkey”, Ph.D. Dissertation. National Sun Yat-Sen University.
• Turney, P. D. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. arXiv preprint cs/0212032.
• U.S. Department of State. (2021). Country Reports on Terrorism 2020. Washington. Retrieved from: https://www.state.gov/country-reports-on-terrorism-2/
• Weinberg, L. (2009). Global terrorism. New York: The Rosen Publishing Group.
• Wessely, S., Hyams, K. C., & Bartholomew, R. (2001). Psychological implications of chemical and biological weapons: long term social and psychological effects may be worse than acute ones. BMJ, 323(7318), 878-879.