Marksizm’in Uluslararası Hukuk Yaklaşımı

Year 2021, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 541 - 568, 31.12.2021

Mehmet Dalar

https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.972298

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de üzerinde oldukça sınırlı çalışılmış olan Marksizm’in uluslararası hukuk yaklaşımın ele alarak, bilinen uluslararası hukuk anlayış ve yöntemine karşı Marksizm’in nasıl bir tez ortaya çıkardığını incelemektedir. Marksizm’in genel olarak hukuk özel olarak uluslararası hukuk teorisinin olup olmadığını tartışan çalışma, post kolonyal dönemde ve zamanımızda hegemonyanın etkin olduğu uluslararası hukukun karşı karşıya kaldığı çıkmaza eleştirel bakış açısını geliştiren Marksist yaklaşımın koyduğu çözüm seçeneklerini değerlendirmektedir. 1917’de Rusya’da gerçekleşen Ekim Devrimi sonucunda Marksizm’i temel alarak kurulan Sovyet Sosyalist Cumhuriyetler Birliği’nin bu temelde uluslararası hukuka getirdiği bakışı ve bu hukuku ne ölçüde etkilediğini ele alan bu çalışma, Sovyetlerin dağılmasından sonra ortaya çıkan gelişmelere Marksizm nasıl bir yaklaşım geliştirdiğini açıklamaktadır.

Keywords

Sömürü, Hukuk, Hegemonya, Emperyalizm, Uluslararası Hukuk

Marxisim’s Approach to International Law

Abstract

This study deals with the international law approach of Marxism, which has been studied very limitedly in Turkey, and also examines what kind of a thesis Marxism has come up with against the known concept and method of current international law. Discussing whether Marxism has a theory of law in general and international law in particular, the study evaluates the solution options put forward by the Marxist approach, which develops a critical perspective on the deadlock faced by international law in which hegemony is effective in the post-colonial period and in our time. As a result of the October Revolution that took place in Russia in 1917, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was established based on Marxism. Examining the perspective brought by this State to international law and how it affects international law, this study explains how Marxism developed an approach to the developments that emerged after the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

Keywords

Exploitation, Law, Hegemony, Imperialism, International Law

References

• Anghie, Antony (2004). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Butler, William E. (1970). “American Research on Soviet Approaches to Public International Law”. Columbia Law Review, 70(2), 218-235.
• Callinicos, Alex (1991). “Marxism and Imperialism Today”. International Socialism, 50, 3-48.
• Carty, Anthony (2007). Philosophy of International Law. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
• Cherviatsova, Alina; Yarmysh, Oleksandr (2017). “Soviet International Law: Between Slogans and Practice”. Journal of the history of International Law, 19, 296-327.
• Chimni, B. S. (2017). International Law and World Order. 2nd editon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chimni, B. S. (2008). “An Outline of a Marxist Course on Public International Law”, Marx, Susan (Ed.). International Law on the Left, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53-91.
• Chimni, B. S. (2004). “An Outline of a Marxist Course on Public International Law”. Leiden Journal of International Law, 17, 1-30.
• Collins, Hugh (2016). Marksizm ve Hukuk. 2. Baskı. (Çev. Umre Deniz Tuna). Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
• Cutler, A. Claire (2005). “Gramsci, Law, and the Culture of Global Capitalism”. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8(4), 527-542.
• Çelik, Edip F. (1987). Milletlerarası Hukuk. (Birinci Kitap). İstanbul: Filiz Kitabevi.
• Hazard, John N. (1990). "New Thinking" in Soviet Approaches to International Politics and Law”. Pace International Law Review, 2(1), 1-19.
• Karahanoğulları, Onur (2003). “Marksizm ve Hukuk” Yazın İncelemesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 58(3), 197-231.
• Kennedy, David (1987). "The Sources of International Law." American University International Law Review, 2(1), 1-96.
• Kenz, Peter (2006). A History of Soviet Union from the Beginning to End. (2’nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Knox, Robert (2009). “Marxism, International Law, and Political Strategy”. Leiden Journal of International Law, 22, 413-436.
• Koskenniemi, Martti (2011). The Politics of International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
• Koskenniemi, Martti (2008). “What Should International Lawyers Learn from Karl Marx”, Marx, Susan (Ed.). International Law on the Left, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30-52.
• Koskenniemi, Martti (2006). From Apology to Utupia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lapenna, Ivo (1963). “The Legal Aspects and Political Significance of the Soviet Concept of Co-existence”. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 12(3), 737-778.
• Lenin, V. İ. (Tarihsiz). Karl Marks’ın Hayatı, Felsefesi Sosyolojisi. (Çev. Hikmet Kıvılcımlı). İstanbul: Bozkurt Matbaası.
• Lenin, V. İ. (1990). Ulusların Kaderlerini Tayin Hakkı. 8. Baskı. (Çev. Muzaffer Erdost). Ankara: Sol Yayınları.
• Mälksoo, Lauri, (2008), “The History of International Legal Theory in Russia: A Civilizational Dialogue with Europe”. The European Journal of International Law, 19(1), 211-232.
• Marx, Karl; Engels Friedrich (Tarihsiz). Alman İdeolojisi. (Çev. Selahattin Hilav). İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları.
• Marx, Susan (2008). “Introduction”, Marx, Susan (Ed.). International Law on the Left, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-30.
• Marx, K.; Engels, F. (2013). Devlet ve Hukuk Üzerine. Rona Serozan (Derleyen ve Çeviren), 3. Baskı. İstanbul: Çağdaş Hukukçular Derneği Yayınları.
• McWhinney, Edward (1963). “Soviet and Western International Law and the Cold War in the Era of Bipolarity: Inter-Block Law in a Nuclear Age”. The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 1, 40-81.
• Miéville, China (2008). “The Commodity-Form Theory of International Law”, Marx, Susan (Ed.). International Law on the Left, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92-131.
• Miéville, China (2005). Between Equal Rights : A Marxist Theory of International Law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
• Mitchell, R. Hudson (1972). “The Brezhnev Doctrine and Communist Ideology”. The Review of Politics, 34(2), 190-210.
• Moore, Stanley W. (1989). Marx, Engels ve Lenin’de Devlet Kuramı. (Çev. Ahmet Cumhur Aytulun). İstanbul: Simge Yayınları.
• Mouffe, Chantal (1979). “Introduction”, Mouffe, Chantal (Ed.). Gramsci and Marxist Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, 1-29.
• Pasukanis, Evgeny B. (2002). Genel Hukuk Teorisi ve Marksizm. (Çev. Onur Karahanoğulları). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Reçber, Kamuran (2016). Uluslararası Hukuk. 2. Baskı, Bursa: Dora Basım Yayın.
• Snyder, Earl A. ; Bracht, Hans Werner (1958). “Coexistence and International Law”. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 7(1), 54-77.
• Soviet Theories of International Law (1953). Soviet Studies, 4(3), 334-338.
• Tunkin, G. I. (1974). Theory of International Law. William E. Butler (Transl.), Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.