İki Aşamalı Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizinde Çapraz Etkinlik Ölçümü: Türkiye Havalimanları Uygulaması

Nagihan Memiş; Gül Gökay Emel

doi:10.37093/ijsi.1277040

Research Article

Cross Efficiency Measurement in Two-Stage Network Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application of the Airports in Türkiye

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 45 - 67, 30.04.2024

Nagihan Memiş , Gül Gökay Emel

https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1277040

Abstract

This study deals with measuring the overall efficiency of a system by breaking it down into its constituent sub-processes. The airline sector, which is an important service sector for Türkiye, has been chosen as the application area. When the relevant literature is examined, it is seen that the production process in efficiency studies in the Turkish airline sector is carried out with traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) by considering the efficiency process as a single stage. This study aimed to measure the overall efficiency of airports in more detail on the basis of two sub-activities, operational and revenue efficiency, using Network Data Envelopment Analysis (NDEA). Kao and Hwang’s (2008) Relational Network Data Envelopment Analysis model was used in the efficiency analysis. In ranking efficiency values, peer evaluation was used based on Kao and Liu’s (2019) Cross-Efficiency Measurement approach. In the study, 27 airports operated by the State Airports Authority (DHMİ) with an annual passenger traffic of over 400.000 as of 2019 were examined. In the analysis, it was found that while an airport with relative overall efficiency could not be identified, some airports were partially effective in terms of sub-processes.

Keywords

Network Data Envelopment Analysis, Airport Efficiency, Cross-Efficiency Measurement

Ethical Statement

The authors declare that this article complies with ethical standards and rules.

Supporting Institution

No financial support was received from any person or institution for the study.

References

Adler, N., Liebert, V., & Yazhemsky, E. (2013). Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective. Omega, 41(2), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.02.004
Altın, F. G., Karaatlı, M., & Budak, İ. (2017). Avrupa’nın en büyük 20 havalimanının çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ve veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(4), 1049–1064. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/52995/704359
Ar, İ. M. (2012). Türkiye’deki havalimanlarının etkinliklerindeki değişimin incelenmesi: 2007-2011 dönemi için Malmquist-TFV Endeksi uygulaması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(3–4), 143–160. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2707/35812
Asker, V. (2016). The measurement of airports operational effectiveness: An application of the major 10 airports in Turkey. Transport & Logistics: the International Journal, 16(41), 1–9.
Asker, V., & Battal, Ü. (2017). Operational efficiency measurement at selected airports. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, ICMEB17 Special Issue, 351–368. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1124049
Avcı, T., & Aktaş, M. (2016). Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren havalimanlarının performanslarının değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3), 67–77. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/201849
Battal, Ü. (2020). Avrupadaki havaalanı grup şirketlerinin finansal performanslarının ölçülmesi: Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.622991
Bolat, B., Temur, G. T., & Gürler, H. (2016). Türkiye deki havalimanlarının etkinlik tahmini: Veri zarflama analizi ve yapay sinir ağlarının birlikte kullanımı. Ege Academic Review, 16(OZEL), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2016OZEL24424
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2
Chiou, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2006). Route-based performance evaluation of Taiwanese domestic airlines using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.005
Çınaroğlu, E., & Avcı, T. (2017). Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan büyük havalimanlarının iç ve dış hat performanslarının karşılaştırılması. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(4), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i4.184
Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004
Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü [DHMİ]. (2020a, Mayıs). 2019 Havayolu Sektör Raporu. Strateji Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Lists/HavaYoluSektorRaporlari/Attachments/13/2019 Havayolu Sektör Raporu.pdf
Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü [DHMİ]. (2020b, Mayıs). 2019 Faaliyet Raporu. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Lists/FaaliyetRaporlari/Attachments/20/49453_1_DHMI2019FaaliyetRaporu(pdf)_FaaliyetRaporu_2019webformati.pdf
Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.84
European Comission. (2005). Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (2005/C 312/01). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52005XC1209%2803%29
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Whittaker, G. (2007). Network DEA. In J. Zhu & W. D. Cook (Eds.), Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 209-240). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_12
Gramani, M. C. N. (2012). Efficiency decomposition approach: A cross-country airline analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5815–5819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.086
Güner, S., Ergüzel, O. Ş., & Cebeci, H. İ. (2019). Uluslararası havalimanlarının operasyonel etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi: Bölgesel bir karşılaştırma. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(3), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.499533
Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEA models. Surveys in operations research and management science, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sorms.2013.10.001
Hong, J.-D., & Jeong, K.-Y. (2019). Combining data envelopment analysis and multi-objective model for the efficient facility location–allocation decision. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-018-0294-2
Kao, C. (2017). Network data envelopment analysis (Vol. 240). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31718-2
Kao, C., & Hwang, S.-N. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
Kao, C., & Liu, S.-T. (2019). Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems. Omega, 83, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.02.004
Karaoğlu, M. (2014). Evaluation of Turkish airports efficiencies using data envelopment analysis. In R. Banker, A. Emrouznejad, H. Bal, İ. Alp, & M. A. Cengiz (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Measurement: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of DEA (pp. 195–200). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3353.2966
Kıyıldı, R. K., & Karaşahin, M. (2006). Türkiye’deki hava alanlarının veri zarflama analizi ile altyapı performansının değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(3), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.16973
Koçak, H. (2011). Efficiency examination of Turkish airports with DEA approach. International Business Research, 4(2), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n2p204
Köçken, K., Timor, M., & Karakaplan, M. U. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemisi öncesinde ve pandemi döneminde Türkiye’deki havalimanı etkinliklerinin üç aşamalı veri zarflama analizi ile belirlenmesi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 35, 643–652. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1085597
Lee, M. J., & Kim, C. (2018). A network DEA aeronautical and non-aeronautical production model: An application to South Korea airports. Journal of Economic Structures, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-018-0130-2
Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Cui, Q. (2015). Evaluating airline efficiency: An application of Virtual Frontier Network SBM. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 81, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.06.006
Liu, D. (2016). Measuring aeronautical service efficiency and commercial service efficiency of East Asia airport companies: An application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.001
lo Storto, C. (2018). Ownership structure and the technical, cost, and revenue efficiency of Italian airports. Utilities Policy, 50, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.01.003
Lovell, C. A. K. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications (pp. 3–67). Oxford University Press.
Lozano, S., Gutiérrez, E., & Moreno, P. (2013). Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(4), 1665–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.041
Lu, W.-M., Hung, S.-W., Kweh, Q. L., Wang, W.-K., & Lu, E.-T. (2014). Production and marketing efficiencies of the U.S. airline industry: A two-stage network DEA approach. In W. Cook & J. Zhu (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis. international series in operations research & management science (Vol. 208; pp. 537–568). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7_21
Maghbouli, M., Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2014). Two-stage network structures with undesirable outputs: A DEA based approach. Measurement, 48(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.032
Mallikarjun, S. (2015). Efficiency of US airlines: A strategic operating model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 43, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.12.004
Orhan, M. (2019). Türkiye’deki havalimanlarının etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Studies-Economics, Finance, Politics, 14(4), 1455–1472. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.39243
Ömürbek, N., Öksüz Demirgubuz, M., & Tunca, M. Z. (2013). Hizmet sektöründe performans ölçümünde veri zarflama analizinin kullanımı: havalimanları üzerine bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 4(9), 21–43. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/vizyoner/issue/23008/246064
Özsoy, V. S., & Örkcü, H. H. (2021). Structural and operational management of Turkish airports: a bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency. Utilities Policy, 69, 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101180
Öztürk, E., Durak, H. A., & Bal, H. (2014). Evaluation of Turkish airport efficiencies using data envelopment analysis and Moora Method. In M. A. C. Rajiv Banker, Ali Emrouznejad, Hasan Bal, Ihsan Alp (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Measurement: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of DEA (pp. 189–194). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3353.2966
Peker, İ., & Baki, B. (2009). Veri zarflama analizi ile Türkiye havalimanlarında bir etkinlik ölçümü uygulaması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(2), 72–88. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/issue/4382/60125
Sarkis, J. (2007). Preparing your data for DEA. In Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 305–320). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_17
Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270
Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441
Shao, Y., & Sun, C. (2016). Performance evaluation of China’s air routes based on network data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 55, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.01.006
Tavassoli, M., Faramarzi, G. R., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2014). Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input. Journal of Air Transport Management, 34, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.09.001
Ulutaş, B., & Ulutaş, B. (2009, July 29–August 1). An analytic network process combined data envelopment analysis methodology to evaluate the performance of airports in Turkey [Paper presentation]. 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. https://www.isahp.org/2009Proceedings/Final_Papers/90_Ulutas_DEA_ANP_TurkishAirport_Performance_REV_FIN.pdf
Ülkü, T. (2015). A comparative efficiency analysis of Spanish and Turkish airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 46, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.014
Wanke, P. F. (2013). Physical infrastructure and flight consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian airports: A two-stage network-DEA approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 31, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.09.001
Yavuz, İ. (2003). Verimlilik ve etkinlik ölçümüne yeni yaklaşımlar ve illere göre imalat sanayiinde etkinlik karşılaştırmaları (Yayın No. 667). Milli Prodüktivite Merkez Yayınları.
Yazgan, A. E., & Karkacier, O. (2015). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile etkinlik ölçümleri ve havalimanı işletmeciliği sektöründe bir uygulama. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 15–28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uaifd/issue/21603/232022
Yu, M.-M. (2010). Assessment of airport performance using the SBM-NDEA model. Omega, 38(6), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.11.003
Zhu, J. (2011). Airlines performance via two-stage network DEA approach. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 4(2), 260–269. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1931862
Zhu, J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06647-9

İki Aşamalı Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizinde Çapraz Etkinlik Ölçümü: Türkiye Havalimanları Uygulaması

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 1, 45 - 67, 30.04.2024

Nagihan Memiş , Gül Gökay Emel

https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1277040

Abstract

Bu çalışma, bir sistemin genel etkinliğinin sisteminin alt süreçlere ayrıştırılarak ölçülmesini ele almaktadır. Uygulama alanı olarak Türkiye için önemli bir hizmet sektörü olan havayolu sektörü seçilmiştir. Yazın incelendiğinde, Türk havayolu sektöründe yapılan etkinlik çalışmalarında üretim sürecinin tek aşamalı olarak ele alınarak geleneksel Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) ile gerçekleştirildiği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmada ise havalimanlarının genel etkinliğinin, operasyonel ve gelir etkinliği olmak üzere iki alt etkinlik bazında, daha ayrıntılı bir şekilde Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizi ile ölçülmesi amaçlanmıştır. Etkinlik analizinde Kao ve Hwang’ın (2008) İlişkisel Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizi modeli kullanılmıştır. Etkinlik değerlerinin sıralanmasında ise Kao ve Liu’nun (2019) Çapraz Etkinlik Ölçümü kullanılarak akran değerlendirmeden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışmada, Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi tarafından işletilen ve 2019 yılı itibarı ile yıllık yolcu trafiği 400.000’in üzerinde olan 27 havalimanı incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizlerde, göreli tam etkinliğe sahip bir havalimanı tespit edilememişken, bazı havalimanlarının alt süreçler bakımından kısmen etkin olduğu bulgusuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizi, Havalimanı Etkinliği, Çapraz Etkinlik Ölçümü

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmada etik ilke ve standartlara uyulduğu beyan edilmiştir.

Supporting Institution

Yazarlar bu çalışma için herhangi bir finansal destek almadıklarını beyan etmiştir.

References

Adler, N., Liebert, V., & Yazhemsky, E. (2013). Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective. Omega, 41(2), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.02.004
Altın, F. G., Karaatlı, M., & Budak, İ. (2017). Avrupa’nın en büyük 20 havalimanının çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ve veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(4), 1049–1064. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sduiibfd/issue/52995/704359
Ar, İ. M. (2012). Türkiye’deki havalimanlarının etkinliklerindeki değişimin incelenmesi: 2007-2011 dönemi için Malmquist-TFV Endeksi uygulaması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 26(3–4), 143–160. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/atauniiibd/issue/2707/35812
Asker, V. (2016). The measurement of airports operational effectiveness: An application of the major 10 airports in Turkey. Transport & Logistics: the International Journal, 16(41), 1–9.
Asker, V., & Battal, Ü. (2017). Operational efficiency measurement at selected airports. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, ICMEB17 Special Issue, 351–368. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1124049
Avcı, T., & Aktaş, M. (2016). Türkiye’de faaliyet gösteren havalimanlarının performanslarının değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3), 67–77. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/201849
Battal, Ü. (2020). Avrupadaki havaalanı grup şirketlerinin finansal performanslarının ölçülmesi: Veri Zarflama Analizi Yöntemi. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.622991
Bolat, B., Temur, G. T., & Gürler, H. (2016). Türkiye deki havalimanlarının etkinlik tahmini: Veri zarflama analizi ve yapay sinir ağlarının birlikte kullanımı. Ege Academic Review, 16(OZEL), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2016OZEL24424
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1), 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90133-2
Chiou, Y.-C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2006). Route-based performance evaluation of Taiwanese domestic airlines using data envelopment analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.005
Çınaroğlu, E., & Avcı, T. (2017). Türkiye’de faaliyette bulunan büyük havalimanlarının iç ve dış hat performanslarının karşılaştırılması. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 5(4), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v5i4.184
Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004
Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü [DHMİ]. (2020a, Mayıs). 2019 Havayolu Sektör Raporu. Strateji Geliştirme Daire Başkanlığı. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Lists/HavaYoluSektorRaporlari/Attachments/13/2019 Havayolu Sektör Raporu.pdf
Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü [DHMİ]. (2020b, Mayıs). 2019 Faaliyet Raporu. https://www.dhmi.gov.tr/Lists/FaaliyetRaporlari/Attachments/20/49453_1_DHMI2019FaaliyetRaporu(pdf)_FaaliyetRaporu_2019webformati.pdf
Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1994.84
European Comission. (2005). Community guidelines on financing of airports and start-up aid to airlines departing from regional airports (2005/C 312/01). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52005XC1209%2803%29
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Whittaker, G. (2007). Network DEA. In J. Zhu & W. D. Cook (Eds.), Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis (pp. 209-240). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_12
Gramani, M. C. N. (2012). Efficiency decomposition approach: A cross-country airline analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5815–5819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.086
Güner, S., Ergüzel, O. Ş., & Cebeci, H. İ. (2019). Uluslararası havalimanlarının operasyonel etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi: Bölgesel bir karşılaştırma. Alphanumeric Journal, 7(3), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.499533
Halkos, G. E., Tzeremes, N. G., & Kourtzidis, S. A. (2014). A unified classification of two-stage DEA models. Surveys in operations research and management science, 19(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sorms.2013.10.001
Hong, J.-D., & Jeong, K.-Y. (2019). Combining data envelopment analysis and multi-objective model for the efficient facility location–allocation decision. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 15(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-018-0294-2
Kao, C. (2017). Network data envelopment analysis (Vol. 240). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31718-2
Kao, C., & Hwang, S.-N. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
Kao, C., & Liu, S.-T. (2019). Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems. Omega, 83, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.02.004
Karaoğlu, M. (2014). Evaluation of Turkish airports efficiencies using data envelopment analysis. In R. Banker, A. Emrouznejad, H. Bal, İ. Alp, & M. A. Cengiz (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Measurement: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of DEA (pp. 195–200). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3353.2966
Kıyıldı, R. K., & Karaşahin, M. (2006). Türkiye’deki hava alanlarının veri zarflama analizi ile altyapı performansının değerlendirilmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(3), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.19113/sdufbed.16973
Koçak, H. (2011). Efficiency examination of Turkish airports with DEA approach. International Business Research, 4(2), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v4n2p204
Köçken, K., Timor, M., & Karakaplan, M. U. (2022). COVID-19 Pandemisi öncesinde ve pandemi döneminde Türkiye’deki havalimanı etkinliklerinin üç aşamalı veri zarflama analizi ile belirlenmesi. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 35, 643–652. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1085597
Lee, M. J., & Kim, C. (2018). A network DEA aeronautical and non-aeronautical production model: An application to South Korea airports. Journal of Economic Structures, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-018-0130-2
Li, Y., Wang, Y., & Cui, Q. (2015). Evaluating airline efficiency: An application of Virtual Frontier Network SBM. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 81, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.06.006
Liu, D. (2016). Measuring aeronautical service efficiency and commercial service efficiency of East Asia airport companies: An application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.001
lo Storto, C. (2018). Ownership structure and the technical, cost, and revenue efficiency of Italian airports. Utilities Policy, 50, 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.01.003
Lovell, C. A. K. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell, & S. S. Schmidt (Eds.), The measurement of productive efficiency: Techniques and applications (pp. 3–67). Oxford University Press.
Lozano, S., Gutiérrez, E., & Moreno, P. (2013). Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(4), 1665–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.04.041
Lu, W.-M., Hung, S.-W., Kweh, Q. L., Wang, W.-K., & Lu, E.-T. (2014). Production and marketing efficiencies of the U.S. airline industry: A two-stage network DEA approach. In W. Cook & J. Zhu (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis. international series in operations research & management science (Vol. 208; pp. 537–568). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8068-7_21
Maghbouli, M., Amirteimoori, A., & Kordrostami, S. (2014). Two-stage network structures with undesirable outputs: A DEA based approach. Measurement, 48(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.10.032
Mallikarjun, S. (2015). Efficiency of US airlines: A strategic operating model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 43, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.12.004
Orhan, M. (2019). Türkiye’deki havalimanlarının etkinliklerinin veri zarflama analizi ile değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Studies-Economics, Finance, Politics, 14(4), 1455–1472. https://doi.org/10.29228/TurkishStudies.39243
Ömürbek, N., Öksüz Demirgubuz, M., & Tunca, M. Z. (2013). Hizmet sektöründe performans ölçümünde veri zarflama analizinin kullanımı: havalimanları üzerine bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 4(9), 21–43. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/vizyoner/issue/23008/246064
Özsoy, V. S., & Örkcü, H. H. (2021). Structural and operational management of Turkish airports: a bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency. Utilities Policy, 69, 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101180
Öztürk, E., Durak, H. A., & Bal, H. (2014). Evaluation of Turkish airport efficiencies using data envelopment analysis and Moora Method. In M. A. C. Rajiv Banker, Ali Emrouznejad, Hasan Bal, Ihsan Alp (Eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis and Performance Measurement: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of DEA (pp. 189–194). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3353.2966
Peker, İ., & Baki, B. (2009). Veri zarflama analizi ile Türkiye havalimanlarında bir etkinlik ölçümü uygulaması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(2), 72–88. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cusosbil/issue/4382/60125
Sarkis, J. (2007). Preparing your data for DEA. In Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis (pp. 305–320). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_17
Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 U.S. commercial banks. Management Science, 45(9), 1270–1288. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.9.1270
Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441
Shao, Y., & Sun, C. (2016). Performance evaluation of China’s air routes based on network data envelopment analysis approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 55, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.01.006
Tavassoli, M., Faramarzi, G. R., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2014). Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input. Journal of Air Transport Management, 34, 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.09.001
Ulutaş, B., & Ulutaş, B. (2009, July 29–August 1). An analytic network process combined data envelopment analysis methodology to evaluate the performance of airports in Turkey [Paper presentation]. 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. https://www.isahp.org/2009Proceedings/Final_Papers/90_Ulutas_DEA_ANP_TurkishAirport_Performance_REV_FIN.pdf
Ülkü, T. (2015). A comparative efficiency analysis of Spanish and Turkish airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 46, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.03.014
Wanke, P. F. (2013). Physical infrastructure and flight consolidation efficiency drivers in Brazilian airports: A two-stage network-DEA approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 31, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.09.001
Yavuz, İ. (2003). Verimlilik ve etkinlik ölçümüne yeni yaklaşımlar ve illere göre imalat sanayiinde etkinlik karşılaştırmaları (Yayın No. 667). Milli Prodüktivite Merkez Yayınları.
Yazgan, A. E., & Karkacier, O. (2015). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile etkinlik ölçümleri ve havalimanı işletmeciliği sektöründe bir uygulama. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 15–28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uaifd/issue/21603/232022
Yu, M.-M. (2010). Assessment of airport performance using the SBM-NDEA model. Omega, 38(6), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.11.003
Zhu, J. (2011). Airlines performance via two-stage network DEA approach. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 4(2), 260–269. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1931862
Zhu, J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06647-9

There are 56 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language	Turkish
Subjects	Econometric and Statistical Methods, Quantitative Decision Methods
Journal Section	Articles
Authors	Nagihan Memiş 0000-0003-3423-0835 Gül Gökay Emel 0000-0002-2921-1368
Publication Date	April 30, 2024
Submission Date	April 4, 2023
Published in Issue	Year 2024 Volume: 17 Issue: 1

Cite

APA	Memiş, N., & Gökay Emel, G. (2024). İki Aşamalı Ağ Veri Zarflama Analizinde Çapraz Etkinlik Ölçümü: Türkiye Havalimanları Uygulaması. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 17(1), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.1277040

Download Cover Image

Article Files

Full Text

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------