Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults

Year 2022, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 557 - 561, 30.09.2022

Abstract

Objective: In this study, our aim was to obtain the cut-off values with the “Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC)” for estimating gender from the hand sizes of young adult female and male individuals, and also to create logistic regression equations.
Material and Method: This study was carried out on 64 healthy young adult volunteers (29 males, 35 females) aged 18-22 years. Hand photos of the volunteers were taken using the Canon 800D camera. Hand length and hand breadth were measured with the “Image J” program. A total of 256 measurements were carried out.
Results: Right hand mean length (in cm) was 17.70 for women and 20.01 for men; The mean breadth of the right hand was found to be 8.10 in women and 9.34 in men. The difference between the right and left sides in terms of hand length in men and both hand length and hand breadth in women was statistically significant p<0.005. The difference between the genders in terms of hand length and breadth values was also statistically significant, p<0.005. Cut-off values (in cm); 18.97 for right hand length, 8.874 for right hand breadth, 19,015 for left hand length, and 8.883 for left hand breadth. Regression equations for estimating gender were obtained from hand length and hand breadth. Among the equations created based on hand length and hand breadth, the equation with the highest probability of correct prediction was the equation based on left hand breadth (R square=0.824, overall true predicted ratio =93.8%).
Conclusion: We believe that the regression formulas obtained from hand morphometric values will be useful for anatomists, forensic medicine specialists and forensic anthropologists.

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

Yok

Thanks

We would like to thank the students of İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, who voluntarily participated in this study

References

  • 1. "Identification Of Skeletal Remains" (PDF). forensicjournals.com. November 5, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  • 2. Vance Veronica L, Maryna Steyn, and Ericka N. L’Abbé. "Nonmetric sex determination from the distal and posterior humerus in black and white South Africans." Journal of forensic sciences 56.3 (2011): 710-714.
  • 3. García‐Campos, Cecilia et al. "Contribution of dental tissues to sex determination in modern human populations." American Journal of Physical Anthropology 166.2 (2018): 459-472.
  • 4. Aboul-Hagag, Khaled E et al. "Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in Upper Egyptians." Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 1.2 (2011): 80-86.
  • 5. Akhlaghi Mitra, Behzad Moradi, and Marzieh Hajibeygi. "Sex determination using anthropometric dimensions of the clavicle in Iranian population." Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 19.7 (2012): 381-385.
  • 6. Singh, Gagandeep, and Indu Talwar. "Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in human skull for sex determination." Human biology review 2.1 (2013): 29-41.
  • 7. Verma Rajesh, et al. "Estimation of sex in forensic examinations using logistic regression and likelihood ratios." Forensic Science International: Reports 2 (2020): 100118.
  • 8. Ahmed Altayeb Abdalla. "Estimation of sex from the upper limb measurements of Sudanese adults." Journal of forensic and legal medicine 20.8 (2013): 1041-1047.
  • 9. Jee Soo-Chan, Sangwoo Bahn, and Myung Hwan Yun. "Determination of sex from various hand dimensions of Koreans." Forensic science international 257 (2015): 521-e1.
  • 10. Kanchan Tanuj and Prateek Rastogi. "Sex determination from hand dimensions of North and South Indians." Journal of forensic sciences 54.3 (2009): 546-550.
  • 11. Nur-Intaniah Ishak, Naomi Hemy, Daniel Franklin. “Estimation of sex from hand and handprint dimensions in a Western Australian population.” Forensic Science International 221, Issues 1–3, (2012): 154.e1-154.e6

Genç Erişkinlerde El Anatomisi, Cinsiyet Farklılıkları, ROC Eğrisi Değerleri ve Regresyon Formülleri

Year 2022, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 557 - 561, 30.09.2022

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmamızda genç erişkin kadın ve erkek bireylerin el boyutlarından cinsiyet tahminine yönelik “Receiver Operator Characteristic” analizi ile cut-off değerlerinin (kesme-değerlerinin) elde edilmesi ve logistic regresyon denklemlerinin oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma, sağlıklı 18-22 yaş aralığında, 64 genç erişkin gönüllü üzerinde (29 erkek, 35 kadın) gerçekleştirildi. Gönüllülerin el fotoğrafları Canon 800D fotoğraf makinesi kullanılarak çekildi. Standardizasyon için fotoğraflamadan önce milimetrik cetvel kullanıldı. El uzunluğu ve el genişliği “Image J” programı ile ölçüldü. Toplamda 128 elde ölçüm yapıldı.
Bulgular: Sağ el ortalama uzunluğu (cm) kadınlarda 17,70, erkeklerde 20,01; sağ el ortalama genişliği kadınlarda 8,10, erkeklerde 9,34 olarak bulundu. Her iki cinsiyette de el uzunluğu değerleri ile el genişliği değerleri arasında orta düzeyde pozitif korelasyon tespit edildi. Erkeklerde el uzunluğu, kadınlarda hem el uzunluğu hem de el genişliği bakımından sağ ve sol taraflar arasındaki fark, istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı p<0,005. El uzunluk ve genişlik değerleri açısından cinsiyetler arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı p<0,005. Kesmedeğerleri (cm); sağ el uzunluğu için 18,977, sağ el genişliği için 8,874, sol el uzunluğu için 19,015 sol el genişliği için 8,883 olarak saptandı. El uzunluğu ve el genişliğine bağlı oluşturulan denklemler içerisinde doğru tahmin ihtimali en yüksek olan denklem sol el genişliğine bağlı oluşturulan denklemdi (R2=0,824, Genel doğru tahmin oranı %93,8).
Sonuç: El morfometrik değerlerinden elde edilen regresyon formüllerinin anatomistler, adli tıp uzmanları ve adli antropologlar açısından faydalı olacağı kanaatindeyiz.

Project Number

Yok

References

  • 1. "Identification Of Skeletal Remains" (PDF). forensicjournals.com. November 5, 2010. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  • 2. Vance Veronica L, Maryna Steyn, and Ericka N. L’Abbé. "Nonmetric sex determination from the distal and posterior humerus in black and white South Africans." Journal of forensic sciences 56.3 (2011): 710-714.
  • 3. García‐Campos, Cecilia et al. "Contribution of dental tissues to sex determination in modern human populations." American Journal of Physical Anthropology 166.2 (2018): 459-472.
  • 4. Aboul-Hagag, Khaled E et al. "Determination of sex from hand dimensions and index/ring finger length ratio in Upper Egyptians." Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 1.2 (2011): 80-86.
  • 5. Akhlaghi Mitra, Behzad Moradi, and Marzieh Hajibeygi. "Sex determination using anthropometric dimensions of the clavicle in Iranian population." Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 19.7 (2012): 381-385.
  • 6. Singh, Gagandeep, and Indu Talwar. "Morphometric analysis of foramen magnum in human skull for sex determination." Human biology review 2.1 (2013): 29-41.
  • 7. Verma Rajesh, et al. "Estimation of sex in forensic examinations using logistic regression and likelihood ratios." Forensic Science International: Reports 2 (2020): 100118.
  • 8. Ahmed Altayeb Abdalla. "Estimation of sex from the upper limb measurements of Sudanese adults." Journal of forensic and legal medicine 20.8 (2013): 1041-1047.
  • 9. Jee Soo-Chan, Sangwoo Bahn, and Myung Hwan Yun. "Determination of sex from various hand dimensions of Koreans." Forensic science international 257 (2015): 521-e1.
  • 10. Kanchan Tanuj and Prateek Rastogi. "Sex determination from hand dimensions of North and South Indians." Journal of forensic sciences 54.3 (2009): 546-550.
  • 11. Nur-Intaniah Ishak, Naomi Hemy, Daniel Franklin. “Estimation of sex from hand and handprint dimensions in a Western Australian population.” Forensic Science International 221, Issues 1–3, (2012): 154.e1-154.e6
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Araştırma Makaleleri
Authors

Sinan Bakırcı 0000-0003-1170-6036

Kübra Erdoğan 0000-0003-0417-4094

Project Number Yok
Early Pub Date September 29, 2022
Publication Date September 30, 2022
Submission Date July 1, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 7 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Bakırcı, S., & Erdoğan, K. (2022). Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(3), 557-561.
AMA Bakırcı S, Erdoğan K. Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults. İKÇÜSBFD. September 2022;7(3):557-561.
Chicago Bakırcı, Sinan, and Kübra Erdoğan. “Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults”. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 7, no. 3 (September 2022): 557-61.
EndNote Bakırcı S, Erdoğan K (September 1, 2022) Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 7 3 557–561.
IEEE S. Bakırcı and K. Erdoğan, “Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults”, İKÇÜSBFD, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 557–561, 2022.
ISNAD Bakırcı, Sinan - Erdoğan, Kübra. “Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults”. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi 7/3 (September 2022), 557-561.
JAMA Bakırcı S, Erdoğan K. Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults. İKÇÜSBFD. 2022;7:557–561.
MLA Bakırcı, Sinan and Kübra Erdoğan. “Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults”. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 3, 2022, pp. 557-61.
Vancouver Bakırcı S, Erdoğan K. Hand Anatomy, Gender Differences, ROC Curve Values and Regression Formulas in Young Adults. İKÇÜSBFD. 2022;7(3):557-61.



Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.