GÜNDEMİ TWİTLEMEK: TWITTER’DA ENFORMASYON GÜVENİLİRLİĞİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 124 - 140, 30.11.2021

Ayşegül Elif Çaycı , Berk Çaycı , İhsan Eken

https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.886479

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Sosyal medya, kullanıcı türevli içerik üretimine izin vermektedir. Bu özelliği sayesinde sosyal medya platformlarındaki kullanıcıların hepsi içerik üretim sürecine katılabildiği gibi aynı zamanda üretilen içeriğin birer tüketicileridir. Bu durum sosyal medyada üretilen içeriğe yönelik güven sorunsalının ortaya çıkmasına sebep olmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı; sosyal medyada enformasyon güvenilirliğini etkileyen faktörleri Twitter örneği üzerinden analiz etmektir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma desenlerinden, tarama türünde betimleyici bir araştırma olan anket veri toplama tekniği kullanılmıştır. Covid-19 pandemisi sebebiyle anket çevrimiçi ortamda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemi, amaçsal örneklem tekniği kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Araştırmaya 924 Twitter kullanıcısı katılmıştır. Araştırmayla; Twitter’da paylaşılan enformasyonun güvenilirliğini etkileyen faktörlerin, enformasyonun niteliği, argüman gücü, medya şeffaflığı ve medya bağlılığı olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

sosyal medya, enformasyon güvenilirliği, twitter, dezenformasyon

References

• Akyüz, S. S., Gülnar, B., and Kazaz, M. (2021). Yeni Medyada Haber Güvenilirliği Sorunu: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Sahte/Yalan Haberlere Yönelik Doğrulama Refleksleri. Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 125-149.
• Allcott, H., Matthew, G., and Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research and Politics April-June, 1–8.
• Aslan, E. (2016). Markaların Kriz Dönemlerinde Sosyal Medya Kullanımı Stratejileri: Gezi Parkı Olayları Sürecinde Twitter Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 505-533.
• Balakrishnan, J., and Griffiths, M. D. (2018). An Exploratory Study of “Selfitis” and the Development of the Selfitis Behavior Scale. Springer, 722-736.
• Boyd, D. M., and Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 210-230.
• Bruns, A. (2016). User-Generated Content. K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley, and E. W. Rothenbuhler içinde, The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (s. 1-5). John Wiley & Sons.
• Budak, A. (2010, Nisan). Facebook, Twitter and Barack Obama: New Media and The 2008 Presidential Elections. Washington: Georgetown University.
• Burns, A., and Eltham, B. (2009). Twitter Free Iran: an Evaluation of Twitter's Role in Public Diplomacy and Information Operations in Iran's 2009 Election Crisis. Proceedings of Communications Policy & Research Forum, (s. 298-310). Sydney.
• Castells, M. (2009). Communıcatıon Power. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., and Poblete, B. (2011). Information Credibility on Twitter. 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, (s. 675-684). Hyderabad, India.
• Cataldi, M., Caro, L. D., and Schifanella, C. (2010). Emerging topic detection on Twitter based on temporal and social terms evaluation. 10 th The Tenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining, (s. 1-10). New York.
• Collins, B., Hoang, D. T., Nguyen, N. T., and Hwang, D. (2020). Trends in combating fake news on social media – a survey. Journal of Information and Telecommunication, 1-20.
• Filibeli, T. E., and Şener, O. (2019). Manipüle Edilmiş Enformasyonel Bir Vitrin ve Popülist Bir Enformasyon Alanı Olarak Twitter. Moment Dergi , Medya ve Katılım, 492-515.
• Fishbein, M., Zimmer, K. H., Haeften, E. v., and Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 238-245.
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
• Geeng, C., Yee, S., and Roesner, F. (2020). Fake News on Facebook and Twitter: Investigating How People (Don’t) Investigate. CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (s. 1-14).
• Gottfried, J., and Shearer, E. (2016, Mayıs 26). News Use across Social Media Platforms 2016. Pew Research Center Journalism & Media: https://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/ adresinden alındı
• Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (1988). Multivariate Data Analysis a Global Perspective. Prentice-Hall Inc.
• Handerson, A., and Bowley, R. (2010). Authentic Dialogue? The Role of "Friendship" in a Social Media Recruitment Campaign. Journal of communication Management, 237-257.
• Huberman, B., Romero, D. M., and Wu, F. (2009). Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope. First Monday Peer Reviewed Journal on The Internet.
• Kang, M. (2010). Measuring Social Media Credibility: A Study on a Measure of Blog Credibility. Syracuse , Syracuse University.
• Kharroub, T., and Baş, Ö. (2015). Social media and protests: An examination of Twitter images of the 2011 Egyptian revolution. New Media & Society.
• Lee, C., Kwak, H., Park, H., and Moon, S. (2010). Finding Influentials Based on the Temporal Order of Information Adoption in Twitter. 19th World-Wide Web (WWW) Conference. Raleigh.
• Li, R., and Suh, A. (2015). Factors Influencing Information Credibility on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Facebook Pages. Procedia Computer Science, 314-328.
• Lin, K.-Y., and Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why People Use Social Networking Sites: An Empirical Study Integrating Network Externalities and Motivation Theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 1152-1161.
• McCombs, M. E., and Shaw, D. L. (1993). The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas. Journal of Communication, 68-84.
• McCombs, M., and Shaw, D. L. (1997). The Agenda-Setting:Agendas of Attributes and Frames. Mass Comm Review, 32-52.
• McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy The Making of Typographic Man. University of Toronto Press,.
• Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., and Castillo, C. (2010). Twitter Under Crisis: Can we trust what we RT? 1st Workshop on Social Media Analytics(SOMA' 10). ACM Press.
• Osch, W. v., and Avital, M. (2010). Generative Collectives. ICIS 2010 Proceedings.
• Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: The Penguin Press.
• Peary, B. D., Shaw, R., and Takeuchi, Y. (2012). Utilization of Social Media in the East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami and its Effectiveness. Journal of Natural Disaster Science, 3-18.
• Pew Research Center. (2008, Aralık 23). Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2008/12/23/internet-overtakes-newspapers-as-news-outlet/ adresinden alındı
• Quan-Haase, A., and Young., A. L. (2010). Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society , 350-361.
• Scheufele, D. A., and Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 9-20.
• Sisco, H. F., and McCorkindale, T. (2013). Communicating “pink”: an analysis of the communication strategies, transparency, and credibility of breast cancer social media sites . International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 287-301.
• Soğukdere, S., and Öztunç, M. (2020). Sosyal Medyada Koronavirüs Dezenformasyonu. Kastamonu İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 59-85.
• Sreejesh, S., Paul, J., Strong, C., and Pius, J. (2020). Consumer response towards social media advertising: Effect of media T interactivity, its conditions and the underlying mechanism. International Journal of Information Management, 1-11.
• Sutton, J., Palen, L., and Shklovski, I. (2008). Backchannels on the Front Lines: Emergent Uses of Social Media in the 2007 Southern California Wildfire. The 5th International ISCRAM conference. Washington, DC.
• Şencan, H. (2014). Veri Analizi. 2020 tarihinde https://ders.es/: https://ders.es/tez/gecerlilik_analizleri.html adresinden alındı
• Tan, Y., and Wearver, D. H. (2007). Agenda-Setting Effects among the Media, the Public and Congress. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 729-844.
• Tao, C., and Bucy, E. P. (2007). Conceptualizing media stimuli in experimental research: Psychological versus attribute-based definitions. Human Communication Research, 397-426.
• Teyit.org. (2021, Nisan 26). Teyit.org: https://teyit.org/nedir adresinden alındı
• Uslu, A. (2017). Müşteri-Çalışan Uyumunun Müşteri Memnuniyeti ve Davranışsal Niyetine Etkisi: Fethiye’deki Konaklama İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 197-211.
• Westerman, D., and Spence, P. R. (2014). Social Media as Information Source: Recency of Updates and Credibility of Information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 171-183.
• Yang, S. U., and Lim, J. S. (2009). The Effects of Blog-Mediated Public Relations (BMPR) on Relational Trust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 341-359.