SOSYAL MEDYADA İHLAL “SHARENTİNG” ÜZERİNE BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Year 2024, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 134 - 157, 30.05.2024

Seher Karataş , Şeyda Aydoğan

https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.1417863

Abstract

Sosyal medya günümüzde temel ihtiyaçlardan biri haline gelmiştir. Sosyal medya kullanıcılarının günün her anında sosyal medyayı takip edip, sürekli paylaşım yapma sorunu birtakım problemleri de beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu problemlerden doğan Sharenting (paylaşananababalık) kavramı son zamanlarda araştırılması önem arz eden bir konu haline gelmiştir. Sharenting, bireylerin çocuklarını ve ebevenliğini mahremiyet sınırlarını aşarak sosyal medya platformlarında sergilemesinden ortaya çıkan bir kavramdır. Bu çalışmada 2017-2023 yılları arasında çalışılmaya başlayan bu kavramın bibliyometrik özetini vermek amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmada bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ve VOSviewer haritalama analizi kullanılmıştır. Web of Science veri tabanından 95 araştırma makalesi çalışmanın örneklemine dâhil edilerek, referanslar, atıf yapılan ülkeler, kurumlar, yazarlar haritası, anahtar kelimeler haritası, yıllara göre çalışma sayısı, çalışma alanlarının açığa çıkarılması, çalışma türleri, çalışma yapılan diller hakkında derin bir bilgi haritası sunulmaktadır.
Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, sharenting kavramı ile ilgili çalışmalar yıllar geçtikçe artmaktadır. 2017’ de 2 çalışma yapılırken, 2022 ve 2023 yıllarında 23 çalışma yapılmıştır. Konuyla ilgili en fazla yayın çıkaran üniversiteler arasında University of Antwerp (n=6), University of Bologna (n=6); en çok yayın yapan ülkeler arasında USA (n=18) ilk sırada yer alırken, en çok atıf alan yazarlar arasında Blum-Ross, Alicia (124 atıf), Livingstone, Sonia (124 atıf), Verswijvel, Karen (77 atıf) yer almaktadır. Ortak anahtar sözcükler incelendiğinde, sharenting (n=60), social media (n=32), children (n=16), parents (n=13), privacy (n=12) kelimeleri kullanılırken, sharenting (paylaşananababalık) kavramı ile ilgili 95 yayında toplam 816 atıf yapılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler kapsamında sharenting (paylaşananababalık) konusunda son zamanlarda popüler hale gelen bir kavram olduğu açığa çıkmaktadır. Türkiye’ de sayılı çalışma yapılan bu konu, araştırmacılara yol gösterici kaynak haritası sunduğu için önem taşımaktadır.

Keywords

sharenting, sosyal medya, çocuk, ebeveyn, mahremiyet

Ethical Statement

Çalışma etik beyan gerektirmemektedir

Supporting Institution

çalışmayı destekleyen kurum yoktur

Thanks

teşekkür yoktur

A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS ON THE VIOLATION “SHARENTING” ON SOCIAL MEDIA

Abstract

Social media has become one of the basic needs today. The problem of social media users following social media every moment of the day and constantly sharing brings along some problems. The concept of Sharenting (sharing parenting) arising from these problems has recently become a need for research. Sharenting is a concept that emerges when individuals exhibit their children and parents on social media platforms by exceeding the limits of privacy. This study aims to provide a bibliometric summary of this concept, which started to be studied between 2017-2023. Bibliometric analysis method and VOSviewer mapping analysis were used in the study. By including 95 research articles from the Web of Science database in the sample of the study, a deep information map is presented about references, cited countries, institutions, authors map, keywords map, number of studies by years, revealing the fields of study, types of studies, languages studied.
According to the research results, studies on the concept of sharenting are increasing over the years. 2 studies were conducted in 2017, while 23 studies were carried out in 2022 and 2023. Universities with the most publications on the subject include University of Antwerp (n=6), University of Bologna (n=6); among the most published countries, USA (n=18) ranked first, while the most cited authors include Blum-Ross, Alicia (124 citations), Livingstone, Sonia (124 citations), Verswijvel, Karen (77 citations) is received. When studying common keywords, the words sharenting (n=60), social media (n=32), children (n=16), parents (n=13), privacy (n=12) were used, while a total of 816 citations were made in 95 publications related to the concept of sharenting. Within the scope of the data obtained in the study, it is revealed that sharenting is a concept that has become popular recently. This issue, conducted in Turkey, is important because it provides a guide resource map for researchers.

Keywords

sharenting, social media, child, parent, privacy

References

• Alemdar, E. ve Kahraman, S. (2023). Annelerin paylaşan ebeveynlik (sharenting) eylemlerini inceleyen ölçek geliştirme çalışması. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 9(1), 70-82.
• Autenrieth, U. (2023). The case of “sharenting”—parental action strategies in the contested field of visualizing children in online environments. In Dethloff, N., Kaesling, K., Specht-Riemenschneider, L. (Eds), Families And New Media Comparative Perspectives On Digital Transformations İn Law And Society, (p. 113-129). Germany: Springer.
• Baloğlu, E. (2023). Instagram çağının dijital ebeveynleri: sharenting bağlamında bir inceleme. TRT Akademi, (8)19, 766-785.
• Barnes, R., and Potter, A. (2021). Sharenting and parents’ digital literacy: an agenda for future research. Communication Research And Practice, 7(1), 6-20.
• Baştemur, Ş., Borucu, D. H., ve Bulut, S. (2021). Ebeveynlerin çocuklarının fotoğrafını sosyal medyada paylaşmasının (sharenting) psikolojik sonuçları: bir sharenting olgu incelemesi. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 28(2),166-173.
• Baştemur, Ş., ve Kurşuncu, M. A. (2022). Sharenting: why parents share their children’ photos on social media?. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12 (3), 2911-2928.
• Benevento, A. (2023). Identifying hashtag cultures to study the construction of childhood image and parents’ aspirations. Culture & Psychology, 0(0), 1-22.
• Beuckels, E., Hudders, L., Vanwesenbeeck, I., and Van den Abeele, E. (2024). Work it baby! A survey study to investigate the role of underaged children and privacy management strategies within parent influencer content. New Media & Society, 14614448231218992.
• Bhroin, N.N., Dinh, T., Thiel, K., Lampert, C., Staksrud, E., and Ólafsson, K. (2022). The privacy paradox by proxy: Considering predictors of sharenting. Media and Communication, 10(1), 371-383.
• Blum-Ross, A., and Livingstone, S. (2017). “Sharenting,” parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication, 15(2), 110–125.
• Brosh, A. (2016). When the child is born into the ınternet: sharenting as a growing trend among parents on Facebook. The New Educational Review, 43(1), 225-235.
• Budianto, E. W. H. and Dewi, N.D.T (2023). Pemetaan penelitian rasio dividend per share (dps) pada perbankan syariah dan konvensional: studi bibliometrik Vosviewer dan literature review, Al-Mal: Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Islam, 4(2), 84-94.
• Cai, X. (2023). Do I have the right to share? Sharenting and psychological ownership of children’s information in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 17(4), 579-597.
• Choi, G. Y., and Lewallen, J. (2017). “Say Instagram, Kids!”: Examining sharenting and children’s digital representations on ınstagram. Howard Journal of Communications, 29(2), 144-164.
• Cino, D. (2022). Beyond the surface: Sharenting as a source of family quandaries: Mapping parents’ social media dilemmas. Western Journal of Communication, 86(1), 128-153.
• Cino, D., and Formenti, L. (2021). To share or not to share? That is the (social media) dilemma. Expectant mothers questioning and making sense of performing pregnancy on social media. Convergence, 27(2), 491-507.
• Cino, D., Demozzi, S., and Subrahmanyam, K. (2020). “Why post more pictures if no one is looking at them?” Parents’ perception of the Facebook like in sharenting. The Communication Review, 23(2), 122-144.
• Çimke, S. ,Gürkan, D.Y ve Polat, S. (2018). Child rights neglect in social media: sharenting, Güncel Pediatri-Journal of Current Pediatrics, 16(2), 261-267.
• Das, R. (2023). Parents’ understandings of social media algorithms in children’s lives in England: Misunderstandings, parked understandings, transactional understandings and proactive understandings amidst datafication. Journal Of Children And Media, 17(4), 506-522.
• Davide, C., & Dalledonne Vandini, C. (2020). “Why does a teacher feel the need to post my kid?”: Parents and teachers constructing morally acceptable boundaries of children’s social media presence. International Journal of Communications, 14, 1153-1172.
• De Wolf, R., and Van den Abeele, M. M. V. (2020). Children’s voices on privacy management and data responsibilization. Media and Communication, 8(4), 158-162.
• Dethloff, N. (2023). Families and the law: taking account of children’s evolving capacities in analogue and digital contexts, In Dethloff, N., Kaesling, K., Specht-Riemenschneider, L. (Eds), Families And New Media Comparative Perspectives On Digital Transformations İn Law And Society. (p. 3-31). Germany: Springer.
• Du X.Y, Li D.D, Wang Q.W, Zhang HY. and Yang Y. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of soil phosphate solubilizing microorganisms research using Vosviewer. Life Research, 7(1), 3.
• Ellegaard, O., and Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?. Scientometrics. 105, 1809-1831.
• Elorriaga Illera, A., Monge Benito, S., Olabarri Fernández, E. (2022) . The presence of minors in commercial content and its negative effect on audience: sharenting and the youtuber Verdeliss, Revista ICONO 14. Revista Científica De Comunicación Y Tecnologías Emergentes 20 (1). 1-18.
• Erişir, R. M., ve Erişir, D. (2018). Yeni medya ve çocuk: Instagram özelinde “sharenting” (“paylaşanababalık”) örneği. Yeni Medya E Dergi. 4(50), 50-64.
• Esfandiari, M., and Yao, J. (2023). Sharenting as a double-edged sword: Evidence from Iran. Information, Communication & Society, 26(15), 2942-2960.
• Garmendia, M., Martínez, G., and Garitaonandia, C. (2022). Sharenting, parental mediation and privacy among Spanish children. European Journal of Communication, 37(2), 145-160.
• Goggin, G., and Ellis, K. (2020). Privacy and digital data of children with disabilities: Scenes from social media sharenting. Media and Communication, 8(4), 218-228.
• Günüç, S. (2020). Sharenting eyleminin psikolojik açıdan değerlendirilmesi: Türk ve İngiliz annelerinin karşılaştırılması. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar. 12(1), 281-297.
• Hashim, N. H., Kamarulzaman, Y., Hasim, M. J., and Rahman, N. A. (2021). Sharenting: a study of Malaysian parents' use of social media platforms. Search-Journal of Media and Communıcation Research 13(3), 125-140.
• Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., Trujillo-Torres, J. M., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. (2020). Sharenting: Internet addiction, self-control and online photos of underage children//Sharenting: Internet addiction, self-control and online photos of underage children. Comunicar, 28(64), 97-108.
• Holiday, S., Norman, M. S., and Densley, R. L. (2022). Sharenting and the extended self: Self-representation in parents’ Instagram presentations of their children. Popular Communication, 20(1), 1-15.
• Ivakić, M., and Mandarić Vukušić, A. (2023). Representation of young children and preschoolers on their parents’ ınstagram profiles. Medijske Studije, 14(27), 105-125.
• İnan Kaya, G., ve Kaya, U. (2017). Bir ebeveyn pratiği olarak 'sharenting'. O. N. Akfırat, Do. F. Staub ve G. Yavaş (Ed.), Current Debates In Education. (s. 443-457). United Kingdom: IJOPEC.
• Jiang, X. (2023). Performing Eurasianness, Chineseness, and cosmopolitanism as racialized digital labor: sharenting mixed-blood children on Douyin. Information, Communication & Society, 1-17.
• Jiménez-Iglesias, E., Elorriaga-Illera, A., Monge-Benito, S., and Olabarri-Fernández, E. (2022). Exposición de menores en Instagram: instamadres, presencia de marcas y vacío legal, Revista Mediterranea Comunicacion-Journal Of Communication,13 (1),51-63.
• Jorge, A., Marôpo, L., & Neto, F. (2022). ‘When you realise your dad is Cristiano Ronaldo’: celebrity sharenting and children’s digital identities. Information, Communication & Society, 25(4), 516-535.
• Keskin, D. A., Kaytez, N., Damar, M., Elibol, F., and Aral, N. (2023). Sharenting syndrome: an appropriate use of social media?, Journal Healthcare. 11(10), 1-17.
• Knauf, H., and Schramme, A. (2023). # mamanblogeuse and# mamablogger_de. A cross-country comparison on the concept of mothers and motherhood on Instagram. Popular Communication, 21(3-4), 232-246.
• Kuyumcu, M. (2023). Dijital çağın yeni hastalığı. A. Köseoğlu (Ed.), Dijital Çağda Medya. (s. 127-149). İstanbul: Eğitim Yayınevi.
• Lazard, L., Dann, C., Capdevila, R., and Locke, A. (2019). Sharenting: Pride, affect and the day‐to‐day politics of digital mothering. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 13(3), 1-20.
• Lim, S. S. (2018). Transcendent parentingin digitally connected families. when the technological meets the social, In G. Mascheroni, C. Ponte, and A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital Parenting. The Challenges for Families in the Digital Age (p. 31-39). Göteborg: Nordicom.
• Lipu, M., and Siibak, A. (2019). ‘Take it down!’: Estonian parents’ and pre-teens’ opinions and experiences with sharenting. Media International Australia, 170(1), 57-67.
• Maraşlı, M., Sühendan, E., Yılmaztürk, N. H., and Cok, F. (2016). Parents’ shares on social networking sites about their children: sharenting. The Anthropologist. 24(2), 399-406.
• Merigó, J. M., ve Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
• Morva, O., ve Ünlü, D. G (2022). Parenting blogs and children’s online privacy: on the privacy management of parent blogs in Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi İlef Dergisi, 9(1), 9-30.
• Otero P.(2017) Sharenting… should children’s lives be disclosed on social media? Arch Argent Pediatr. 115(5), 412-413.
• Özgül, T. ,Er, S. ve Yılmaztürk, H. (2022). Anababaların çocuklarıyla ilgili sosyal medya paylaşımları. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 55(1), 239-262.
• Parsa, A., ve Akmeşe, Z. (2019). Sosyal medya ve çocuk istismarı: Instagram anneleri örneği. Kadem Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 163-191.
• Paula, O. (2017). Sharenting… should children’s lives be disclosed on social media?. Arch Argent Pediatr, 115(5), 412-414.
• Peng, Z. (2023). A privacy calculus model perspective that explains why parents sharent. Information, Communication & Society, 0 (0), 1-24.
• Peng, Z. (2023). Your growth is my growth: examining sharenting behaviours from a multiparty privacy perspective. Communication Research and Practice, 9(3), 271-289.
• Porfírio, F., and Jorge, A. (2022). Sharenting of Portuguese male and female celebrities on instagram. Journalism and Media, 3(3), 521-537.
• Ranzini, G., Newlands, G., & Lutz, C. (2020). Sharenting, peer influence, and privacy concerns: A study on the Instagram-sharing behaviors of parents in the United Kingdom. Social Media+ Society, 6(4), 2056305120978376.
• Sarkadi , A., Dahlberg, A., Fängström, K., and Warner, G. (2020). Children want parents to ask for permission before ‘sharenting’. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 56 (6), 981-983.
• Siibak, A. and Traks K. (2019). The dark sides of sharenting. Catalan Journal Communication and Cultural Studies, 11(1), 115-121.
• Staes, L., Walrave, M., and Hallam, L. (2023). Grandsharenting: How grandparents in Belgium negotiate the sharing of personal information related to their grandchildren and engage in privacy management strategies on Facebook. Journal of Children and Media, 17(2), 192-218.
• Steinberg, S. B. (2017). Sharenting: children’s privacy in the age of social media. Emory Law Journal, 66 (4), 841-884.
• Tartari, M., Lavorgna, A., and Ugwudike, P. (2023). Share with care: negotiating children’s health and safety in sharenting practices. Media, Culture & Society, 45(7), 1453-1470.
• Toyah, D. (2019). So ein bild von dirwürdest du nie posten? dein kind auch nicht, https://deinkindauchnicht.org/. Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2024
• Turgut, Y. E., Kopuz, T., Aslan, A., ve Eryılmaz Toksoy, S. (2021). Factors affecting parents' share on social media about their children. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 50(1), 276 – 292.
• Ünlü, D.G and O. Morva (2020). Whose ınformation should be shared with whom?: parents' awareness of children's digital privacy in Turkey. Media Literacy and Academic Research. 3 (2), 109-124.
• Van den Abeele, E., Vanwesenbeeck, I., and Hudders, L. (2024). Child’s privacy versus mother’s fame: unravelling the biased decision-making process of momfluencers to portray their children online. Information, Communication & Society, 1-17.
• Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., Aguaded, I., and Ortega-Tudela, J. M. (2023). “No moral integrity”: Influencer sharenting and parental protective perception. Anàlisi, 69, 11-31.
• Yanhao, C., Mustafa, H., and Ling, T. P. (2024). Mapping the research of travel live streaming: a bibliometric analysis using Vosviewer. Cogent Social Sciences, 10 (1), 2285254 (Erken Erişim).
• Yiğit Açıkgöz, F., ve Çizmeli, D. (2023). İletişim araştırmalarındaki güncel eğilimler üzerine bibliyometrik bir inceleme. Akdeniz İletişim, (43), 214-234.
• Yüksel, H. (2021). Sharenting bağlamında sosyal medyada çocuk imajının inşası, Akademik Düşünce Dergisi, 4(50), 50-68.