Sosyal Korumada Küresel Boyutlar: Sorunlar ve Temel Tartışmalar

Year 2021, Volume: 8 Issue: 30, 13 - 28, 02.10.2021

Abdulkadir Şenkal

https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.975449

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Küreselleşme, diğer faktörlerin yanı sıra hızlı teknoloji transferleri, hızlı yatırım temposu ve küresel bilgi erişimi ile tetiklenen daha yüksek büyüme, istihdam seviyeleri, yaşam standartları ve sosyal koruma için potansiyel olarak geliştirilmiş mali açıdan kayda değer bir pozitif potansiyele sahiptir. Bununla birlikte, faydaları ülkeler içinde ve arasında eşit olmayan bir şekilde dağılmıştır. Bu durum hem gelişmiş ve hem de gelişmekte olan ülkeler açısından ciddi sorunlar ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Dolayısıyla sosyal koruma, küreselleşme sürecinde ciddi açıklara neden olan bir kavramdır. Yirminci yüzyılın başlarında Batı ülkeleri tarafından yeni sosyal koruma programları benimsenmeye başlandıkça toplumsal refaha olan ihtiyacın kapsam ve önemi daha fazla tartışılır hale gelmiştir. Bu tartışmalar, II. Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonraki yıllarda yoğunlaşmış ve hem gelişmiş hem de gelişmekte olan ülkelerde yaygınlaşarak fonlama, hedefler, yönetim ve kapsamı etkileyen konular şeklinde ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

Sosyal Koruma, Küresel Sosyal Koruma, Sosyal Politika, Yoksulluk, Küresel sosyal politika

Global Dimensions in Social Protection: Problems and Main Discussions

Abstract

Globalization has significant financial positive potential for higher growth, employment levels, living standards and social protection, triggered by rapid technology transfers, rapid investment pace and global information access, among other factors. However, its benefits are unevenly distributed within and between countries. This situation creates serious problems for both developed and developing countries. Therefore, social protection is a concept that causes serious deficits in the globalization process. At the beginning of the twentieth century, as new social protection programs began to be adopted by Western countries, the scope and importance of the need for social welfare became more debatable. These discussions intensified in the years after World War II and became widespread in both developed and developing countries, emerging in the form of issues affecting funding, targets, management and scope.

Keywords

Social protection, Global social protection, Social policy, Poverty, Global social policy

References

• Alderman, Harold. “Safety Nets Can Help Address The Risks to Nutrition from Increasing Climate Variability”. Journal of Nutrition. 140/1 (2010): 148-152.
• Barrientos, Armando ve David Hulme. “Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest in Developing Countries: Reflections on a Quiet Revolution Commentary”. Oxford Development Studies. 37/4 (2009): 439-456.
• Barrientos, Armando. “Social Protection and Poverty”. International Journal of Social Welfare. (Special Issue: Social Policy and Poverty). 20/3 (2011): 240-249.
• Barrientos, Armando ve David Hulme. Social Protection for the Poor and the Poorest: Concept, Policies and Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
• Bonilla-Garcia, A. ve J. V. Gruat. Social Protection: A Life Cycle Continuum Investment for Social Justice, Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Development. Geneva: ILO, 2003.
• Conway, Tim, Arjan de Haan ve Andy Norton. “Social Protection: New Directions of Donor Agencies”. Research Report. London: Overseas Development Institute (ODI), 2000.
• Corina, Rodríguez Enríquez. “Current Challenges and Debates on Social Protection in the Global South”. Development Alternatives with Women for a New Era (DAWN) sitesi. March 19, 2020. https://dawnnet.org/2020/03/social-protection-in-the-global-south/.
• Devereux, Stephen. “Building Social Protection System in Southern Africa”. Background Paper to the European Report on Development, Center for Protection, Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, 2010.
• Drolet, Julie L. (der.). Social Development and Social Work Perspectives on Social Protection. London: Routledge, 2016.
• Filgueira, Fernando, Luis Miguel Galindo, Cecilia Giambruno ve Merike Blofield. América Latina ante la Crisis del COVID19: Vulnerabilidad Socio-económica y Respuesta Social. ECLAC-Social Policy Series Series, Santiago: CEPAL/ECLAC, 2020.
• Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko. “Millennium Development Goal 8: Indicators for International Human Rights Obligations?” Human Rights Quarterly. 28 (2006): 966–997.
• Gentilini, Ugo, Steven Were Omamo. “Social Protection 2.0: Exploring Issues, Evidence and Debates in a Globalizing World”. Food Policy. 36/3 (2011): 329-340.
• Hanlon, J. Barrientos and David A. Hulme. Just Give Money To The Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South. Sterling. Vancouver, USA: Kumarian Press, 2010.
• Hickey, Sam. “The Politics of Social Protection: What Do We Get From A ‘Social Contract’ Approach?” Canadian Journal of Development. 32/4 (2011): 426-438.