Abstract
After amendments to the Constitution with Law No. 6771 replaced the parliamentary system implemented in Turkey has left the presidential system of government. The new government system came into force in all aspects with the election of the President elected by the people on July 9, 2018. In the new system, the President is both the head of the state and the sole authority of the government in the status of a responsible politician. In this respect, it has a very different responsibility than the President, who has irresponsible and symbolic powers in the parliamentary system. In this respect, the responsibility of the President; It should be examined under three main headings as political, legal and criminal responsibility. Likewise, the personal responsibility and personal responsibility of the President were separated from each other and evaluated. In this study, After the referendum on the April 16, 2017 Constitutional amendment and the President's office on July 9, 2018, how the scope of the responsibility of the President was regulated in the Constitutional amendment, which was put into effect, a comparative analysis was made with the pre-constitutional amendments and the verbal and systematic interpretation methods were used in terms of the Constitutional law discipline. In this framework, the President; It was seen that he was not responsible for the people only, he did not have political responsibility against the Turkish Grand National Assembly, and that the judicial protection he had for his duty included the subjects not related to the task after the duty, and that he could make the President virtually untouchable for life. In terms of criminal responsibility, it was evaluated that it is very difficult to open an investigation against the President by the Turkish Grand National Assembly. Therefore, the minimum quorum in the investigation and the results related to the operation of the responsibility procedure give the President the impression that a protective shield has been made.