THE COMPARISON OF INDIVIDUALS WHO APPLIED FOR ADOPTION AND INDIVIDUALS WHO DO NOT DESIRE TO BE A PARENT, IN TERMS OF ATTACHMENT STYLES, PERSONALITY TRAITS AND RESILLIENCE

Year 2020, Volume: 19 Issue: 39, 1200 - 1210, 27.12.2020

Pınar Şen Gökçeimam , Rüstem Aşkın , Esra Aydın Sünbül , Mehmet Üstündağ , Rümeysa Dilara Kurban Muhammed Enes Özel Osman Ozan Odabaşı

https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.786009

Abstract

Objective In terms of attachment behaviors, temperature traits and resilience features of individuals who do not desire to have children and, individuals who demand for adoption was compared.
Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in the University Of Health Sciences Erenköy Psychiatric Hospital, 47 individuals who were asked whether there was a mental problem in their legal adoption process and 46 individuals who did not desire to become parents. Sociodemographic data form, Temps-A, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale- short form, Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) and Inventory of Experiences in close relationships (ECR) - II (ECR-II) were comleted to the participants.
Results: Hyperthymic traits were higher in individuals with demand for adoption, whereas depressive, irritable,anxious personality were higher in the other group. The secure attachment rates and resilience scores were found higher in the group who wanted to adopt children. The rates of the avoidance and anxiety levels were higher in the group who did not desire to have children.While the desire to adoption increased, impulsivity decreased , mental resistance also increased .
Conclusion:Secure attachment and psychological resilience scores are higher for the individuals who have demand for adoption .Further studies are needed, to evaluate the biological, social, psychological and cultural factors that influence the motivation to become a parent.

Keywords

adoption, attachment, resilience, temperament traits, impulsivity

EVLAT EDİNMEK İÇİN BAŞVURAN BİREYLERLE BİYOLOJİK ENGELLERİ OLMAMASINA RAĞMEN ANNE BABA OLMA İSTEĞİNE SAHİP OLMAYAN BİREYLERİN BAĞLANMA ŞEKLİ, MİZAÇ ÖZELLİKLERİ, DÜRTÜSELLİK VE RUHSAL DAYANIKLILIK YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Abstract

Evlat edinme talebi olanlar ile çocuk sahibi olmayı düşünmediğini ifade eden bireyler bağlanma şekli, mizaç özellikleri, dürtüsellik ve ruhsal dayanıklılık özellikleri yönünden karşılaştırılmıştır. SBÜ Erenköy RSHH’ne “evlat edinmelerinde ruhsal açıdan sakınca bulunup bulunmadığı” sorulan 47 birey ve ebeveyn olma arzusuna sahip olmayan 46 bireyle çalışılmıştır. Katılımcılara sosyodemografik veri formu, TEMPS-A, Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçeği Kısa Formu (BIS-11-KF), Yetişkinler İçin Psikolojik Dayanıklılık Ölçeği (YPDÖ) ve Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri–II (YIYE-II) uygulanmıştır.Evlat edinme talebi olanlarda hipertimik ; çocuk sahibi olmayı düşünmeyenlerdeyse depresif, irritabl ve anksiyöz mizaç özellikleri; evlat edinmek isteyen grupta güvenli bağlanma oranı ve ruhsal dayanıklılık puanları, çocuk sahibi olmak istemeyen grupta ise kaçınma ve kaygı oranları daha yüksekti. Evlat edinme isteği arttıkça dürtüselliğin azaldığı, ruhsal dayanıklılığınsa arttığı saptandı. Evlat edinme talebine sahip bireylerin güvenli bağlanma özellikleriyle ruhsal dayanıklılıklarının daha fazla olduğu görülmektedir. Bu hususta biyolojik, sosyal, psikolojik ve kültürel etkenlerin de değerlendirileceği çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Keywords

evlat edinme, bağlanma, ruhsal dayanıklılık, mizaç, dürtüsellik

References

• 1. Reitz M, Watson KW. Adoption and the Family System. New York: Guilford Press 1992.
• 2. Malina A, Błaszkiewicz A, Owczarz U. Psychosocial aspects of infertility and its treatment. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(7):527‐531.
• 3. Samadaee-Gelehkolaee K, McCarthy BW, Khalilian A, et al. Factors Associated With Marital Satisfaction in Infertile Couple: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;8(5):96‐109.
• 4. Thompson RA. Attachment theory and research. In Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.3rd Ed. (Ed M Lewis). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins 2002; 164-172.
• 5. Snyder, R., Shapiro, S. & Treleaven, D. Attachment Theory and Mindfulness. J Child Fam Stud 21, 709–717 (2012).
• 6. Raby KL, Dozier M. Attachment across the lifespan: insights from adoptive families. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;25:81‐85.
• 7. “Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment”: Correction. Verhage ML ,Schuengel C ,Madigan S, Pasco Fearon R M, Oosterman M, Rosalinda C, Bakermans- Kranenburg M, IJzendoorn MH . Psychol. Bull 2016; 142(4); 337-366.
• 8. Miller L, Kramer R, Wamer V, Wickramaratne P,Weissmann M.Intergenerational transmission of parental bonding among women.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36:1134-1139.
• 9. Kesebir S, Vahip S, Akdeniz F, Yuncu Z. Bipolar bozuklukta mizaç ile klinik özelliklerin ilişkisi. Turk Psikiyatr Derg 2005;16: 164-169.
• 10. Barone, L.,Lionetti, F.,Green, J. A matter of attachment? How adoptive parents foster post-institutionalized children’s social and emotional adjustment. AttacH.Human Dev 2017; 19(4), 323–339.
• 11. Rutter M. Resilience as a dynamic concept. Dev Psychopathol 2012;24:335- 344.
• 12. Mott SL, Schiller CE, Richards JG, O’Hara MW, Stuart S. Depression and anxiety among postpartum and adoptive mothers. Arch.Women’s Mental Health.2011;14(4), 335–343.
• 13. Levy Shiff R,Goldshmidt,I.,Hard–Even.D. Transition to parenthood in adoptive families.DeV.Psychol 1991;27(1),131-140
• 14. Akiskal HS ,Placidi GF, Signoretta S at all. TEMPS-I: delineating the most discriminant traits of cyclothymic,depressive, irritable and hyperthymic temperaments in a nonpatient population.J Affect Disord 1998;51:7-19.
• 15. Vahip S, Kesebir S, Alkan M ve ark. Affektive temperaments in clinically–well subjects in Turkey :initial psychometric data on TEMPS-A. J Affect Dis 2005;85:113-125.
• 16. Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51:768-774.
• 17. Tamam L, Güleç H , Karataş G. Barratt Dürtüsellik Ölçeği Kısa Formu (Bıs-11-Kf) Türkçe uyarlama çalışması. Arch Neuropsychiatry 2013;50(2), 130-134.
• 18. Friborg O, Hjemdal O, Rosenvinge JH, Martinussen MA .New rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2003;12:65–76.
• 19. Basım HN, Çetin F. Yetişkinler için psikolojik dayanıklılık ölçeği’nin güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2011;22:104–14.
• 20. Fraley RC, Waller NG, Brennan KA. An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J. Person. Soc.Psychol 2000; 78, 350-365.
• 21. Selçuk E, Gunaydın G, Sumer N,Uysal A . Yetişkin bağlanma boyutları için yeni bir ölçüm: Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri-II’nin Türk örnekleminde psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 2005; 8,1-11.
• 22. Jones J .Who adopts? Characteristics of women and men who have adopted children.NCHS data brief,No 12 .Hyattsville MD:National Center for Health Statistics 2009.
• 23. Dikmeer Altınoğlu İ, Erol N, Gençöz T. Evlat Edinilmiş ve Biyolojik Ebeveyniyle Yaşayan Çocukların Davranışsal ve Duygusal Sorunları ve Bağlanma Düzeyleri ile Anne Babalarının Çocuk Yetiştirme Stillerinin Karşılaştırmalı Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2014; 25(4):234-43.
• 24. Calvo V.Palmieri A, Codamo A. Scampoli MR, Bianco F . Perceptions of parental bonding, adult attachment and marital adjustment in prospective adoptive parents. An empirical study in the pre-adoptive period.Sexual and Relationship Therapy 2015; 30(4),419-432.
• 25. Vandivere S, Malm K, Radel L .Adoption USA: A chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of adoptive parents 2009.
• 26. Dozier M,Rutter M .Challenges to the development of attachment relationships faced by young children in foster and adoptive care.In J. Cassidy and P.Shaver (Eds.).Handbook of attechment: Theory, research and clinical applications. New York: Guilford Press ,2nd ed.,2008; 698-717.
• 27. Raby KL, Yarger HA, Lind T, Fraley RC, Leekers E, Dozier M. Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents. Dev. Psychopathol 2017; 29,365-378.
• 28. Foli KJ, Hebdon M, Lim E, South SC.Transitions of Adoptive Parents: A Longitudinal Mixed Methods Analysis. Arch. Psychiatric Nursing 2017.
• 29. Foli KJ, South SC, Lim E, Hebdon M.Maternal postadoption depression, unmet expectations and personality traits.J. Am. Psych. Nurses Assoc 2012(b); 18(5),267-277.
• 30. Barone L, Lionetti F.Attachment and emotional understanding: A study on late-adopted pre-schoolers and their parents. Child:Care Health and Development 2011; 38, 690-696.