BibTex RIS Cite

ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH

Year 2011, Issue: 13, 125 - 138, 18.05.2011

Berna Haktanırlar Ulutaş

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

References

  • Ahn, T., Seiford, L.M. 1993. Sensitivity of DEA models and variable sets in a hypothesis test setting: the efficiency of university operations. In: Ijiri Y, editor. Creative and innovative approaches to the science of management. Wesport CT: Quorum Books, p. 191- 208.
  • Arcelus, F.J., Coleman, D.F. 1997. An efficiency review of university departments. International Journal of Systems Science 28(7): 721-729.
  • Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9): 1078-1092.
  • Beasley, J.E. 1990. Comparing university departments. Omega-International Journal 18(2): 171-83.
  • Bessent, A.M, Bessent, E.W., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Thorogood, N.C. 1983. Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of DEA. Educational and Administrative Quarterly 19(2): 82-107.
  • Buzzigoli, L., Giusti, A., Viviani, A. 2010. The Evaluation of University Departments. A Case Study for Firenze. International Advances on Econonomics Research 16: 24-38.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.
  • Cokgezen, M. 2009. Technical efficiencies of faculties of economics in Turkey, Technical efficiencies of faculties of economics in Turkey. Education Economics 17(1): 81- 94.
  • de Miranda, R.O., Gramani, M.C.N., de Carvalho-Andrade, E. 2010. Technical Efficiency of Business Administration courses – a simultaneous analysis using DEA and SFA, Insper Working Paper WPE: 214/2010.
  • Emrouznejad, A. 2011. Data Envelopment Analysis Homepage, www.DEAzone.com, last viewed: 4/22/2011.
  • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B., Tavares, G. 2008. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Journal of Socio-Economics Planning Science 42(3): 151-157.
  • Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Reisman, A. 2002. Data Envelopment Analysis Literature: A Bibliography Update (1951-2001), available at: http://bilmer.sabanciuniv.edu/elit/gsm/ sugsm02_08.pdf.
  • Gime´nez, V.M., Martı´nez, J.L. 2006. Cost efŞciency in the university: A departmental evaluation model. Economics of Education Review 25: 543–553.
  • Johnes, J., Johnes, G. 1995. Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics: A frontier analysis. Economics of Education Review 14(3): 301- 314.
  • Kao, C., Hung, H.T. 2008. Efficiency analysis of university departments:An empirical study. Omega 36: 653 -664.
  • Kao, C., Pao, H.L. 2009. An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities. Scientometrics 78(2): 261–27.
  • Kao, C., Liu, S.T. 2000. Data envelopment analysis with missing data: an application to University libraries in Taiwan, Journal of the Operational Research Society 51: 897-905.
  • Koksalan, G., Nalcaci, B. 2006. The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education 51: 173-189.
  • Kontolaimou, A., Psallidas, D., Pseiridis, A. 2005. Investigating the efficiency of university of university students: the case of an economics programme in Greece. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=845146.
  • Kontolaimou, A., Psallidas, D., Pseiridis, A. 2006. What Makes Students (In)Efficient? An Exploratory Econometric Inquiry into the Causes of (In)Efficiency in Academic Performance. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=877345.
  • Kuosmanen, T. 2009. Data envelopment analysis with missing data, Journal of the Operational Research Society 60: 1767-1774.
  • Leitner, K.H., Prikoszovits, J., Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M., Stowasser, R., Wagner, K. 2007. The impact of size and specialisation on universities’ department performance: A DEA analysis applied to Austrian universities. Higher Education 53: 517–538.
  • Moreno, A.A., Tadepalli, R. 2002. Assessing Academic Department EfŞciency at a Public University. Managerial Decision Econonics 23: 385-397.
  • Oruc, K.O., Gungor, I., Demiral, M.F. 2009. Application of Fuzzy Data Envelopment on the Measurement of Universities’ Efficiency (In Turkish). Journal Selcuk University Social Sciences Institue, 22/2009: 279-294.
  • Smirlis Y.G., Maragos E.K., Despotis D.K. 2006. Data envelopment analysis with missing values: An interval DEA approach, Applied Mathematics and Computation 177: 1– 10.
  • Seiford, LM. (1997). A bibliography for data envelopment analysis (1978 -1996). Annals of Operations Research 73: 393-438.
  • Stern, Z.S., Mehrez, A., Barboy A. 1994. Academic departments e ciency via DEA. Computers and Operations Research 21(5): 543-556.
  • Tavares, G. (2002). A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis, Rutgor Research Report (RRR 01-02), Rutgers Center for Operations Research Rutgers University, pp 189.
  • Tomkins, C., Green, R. 1988. An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability and Management 4(2): 147-64.
  • Tzeremes, N., Halkos, G. 2010. A DEA approach for measuring university departments' efficiency, MPRA Paper No. 24029, posted 21. July 2010 / 16:13, available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24029/

Year 2011, Issue: 13, 125 - 138, 18.05.2011

Berna Haktanırlar Ulutaş

Abstract

Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) homojen karar verme birimler kümesinin (ör., bankacılık, sağlık, eğitim, vb.)
göreli etkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan parametrik olmayan bir yöntemdir. VZA modellerinin
aynı zamanda üniversiteler ya da daha spesifik olarak üniversite bölümleri için de kullanılmıştır. Uygulamada,
girdi ve çıktı ölçütlerinin belirlenmesi mevcut verilerden hareketle gerçekleştirilir. Fakat, önemli bir ölçütün ele
alınmaması ya da güvenilir olmayan verilerin kullanılması karar vericiyi yanlış yönlendirebilir. Bu yüzden,
çalışmada mevcut olmayan verilerin, örneğin çıktı ölçütlerinden çıkartılarak, karar verme birimlerinin etkinlik
değerlerine etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Bir Mühendislik Fakültesinde bulunan bölümlere ait güncel veriler
incelenerek performans değerleri eğitim ve akademik araştırma yönünden değerlendirilmiştir.

Keywords

Veri Zarflama Analizi Üniversite Bölümleri Kayıp Veriler Etkinlik Ölçümü

References

  • Ahn, T., Seiford, L.M. 1993. Sensitivity of DEA models and variable sets in a hypothesis test setting: the efficiency of university operations. In: Ijiri Y, editor. Creative and innovative approaches to the science of management. Wesport CT: Quorum Books, p. 191- 208.
  • Arcelus, F.J., Coleman, D.F. 1997. An efficiency review of university departments. International Journal of Systems Science 28(7): 721-729.
  • Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9): 1078-1092.
  • Beasley, J.E. 1990. Comparing university departments. Omega-International Journal 18(2): 171-83.
  • Bessent, A.M, Bessent, E.W., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Thorogood, N.C. 1983. Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of DEA. Educational and Administrative Quarterly 19(2): 82-107.
  • Buzzigoli, L., Giusti, A., Viviani, A. 2010. The Evaluation of University Departments. A Case Study for Firenze. International Advances on Econonomics Research 16: 24-38.
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429-444.
  • Cokgezen, M. 2009. Technical efficiencies of faculties of economics in Turkey, Technical efficiencies of faculties of economics in Turkey. Education Economics 17(1): 81- 94.
  • de Miranda, R.O., Gramani, M.C.N., de Carvalho-Andrade, E. 2010. Technical Efficiency of Business Administration courses – a simultaneous analysis using DEA and SFA, Insper Working Paper WPE: 214/2010.
  • Emrouznejad, A. 2011. Data Envelopment Analysis Homepage, www.DEAzone.com, last viewed: 4/22/2011.
  • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B., Tavares, G. 2008. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Journal of Socio-Economics Planning Science 42(3): 151-157.
  • Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Reisman, A. 2002. Data Envelopment Analysis Literature: A Bibliography Update (1951-2001), available at: http://bilmer.sabanciuniv.edu/elit/gsm/ sugsm02_08.pdf.
  • Gime´nez, V.M., Martı´nez, J.L. 2006. Cost efŞciency in the university: A departmental evaluation model. Economics of Education Review 25: 543–553.
  • Johnes, J., Johnes, G. 1995. Research funding and performance in UK university departments of economics: A frontier analysis. Economics of Education Review 14(3): 301- 314.
  • Kao, C., Hung, H.T. 2008. Efficiency analysis of university departments:An empirical study. Omega 36: 653 -664.
  • Kao, C., Pao, H.L. 2009. An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities. Scientometrics 78(2): 261–27.
  • Kao, C., Liu, S.T. 2000. Data envelopment analysis with missing data: an application to University libraries in Taiwan, Journal of the Operational Research Society 51: 897-905.
  • Koksalan, G., Nalcaci, B. 2006. The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education 51: 173-189.
  • Kontolaimou, A., Psallidas, D., Pseiridis, A. 2005. Investigating the efficiency of university of university students: the case of an economics programme in Greece. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=845146.
  • Kontolaimou, A., Psallidas, D., Pseiridis, A. 2006. What Makes Students (In)Efficient? An Exploratory Econometric Inquiry into the Causes of (In)Efficiency in Academic Performance. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=877345.
  • Kuosmanen, T. 2009. Data envelopment analysis with missing data, Journal of the Operational Research Society 60: 1767-1774.
  • Leitner, K.H., Prikoszovits, J., Schaffhauser-Linzatti, M., Stowasser, R., Wagner, K. 2007. The impact of size and specialisation on universities’ department performance: A DEA analysis applied to Austrian universities. Higher Education 53: 517–538.
  • Moreno, A.A., Tadepalli, R. 2002. Assessing Academic Department EfŞciency at a Public University. Managerial Decision Econonics 23: 385-397.
  • Oruc, K.O., Gungor, I., Demiral, M.F. 2009. Application of Fuzzy Data Envelopment on the Measurement of Universities’ Efficiency (In Turkish). Journal Selcuk University Social Sciences Institue, 22/2009: 279-294.
  • Smirlis Y.G., Maragos E.K., Despotis D.K. 2006. Data envelopment analysis with missing values: An interval DEA approach, Applied Mathematics and Computation 177: 1– 10.
  • Seiford, LM. (1997). A bibliography for data envelopment analysis (1978 -1996). Annals of Operations Research 73: 393-438.
  • Stern, Z.S., Mehrez, A., Barboy A. 1994. Academic departments e ciency via DEA. Computers and Operations Research 21(5): 543-556.
  • Tavares, G. (2002). A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis, Rutgor Research Report (RRR 01-02), Rutgers Center for Operations Research Rutgers University, pp 189.
  • Tomkins, C., Green, R. 1988. An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability and Management 4(2): 147-64.
  • Tzeremes, N., Halkos, G. 2010. A DEA approach for measuring university departments' efficiency, MPRA Paper No. 24029, posted 21. July 2010 / 16:13, available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/24029/
There are 30 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Berna Haktanırlar Ulutaş

Publication Date May 18, 2011
Published in Issue Year 2011 Issue: 13

Cite

APA Haktanırlar Ulutaş, B. (2011). ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal(13), 125-138.
AMA Haktanırlar Ulutaş B. ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal. June 2011;(13):125-138.
Chicago Haktanırlar Ulutaş, Berna. “ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH”. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal, no. 13 (June 2011): 125-38.
EndNote Haktanırlar Ulutaş B (June 1, 2011) ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal 13 125–138.
IEEE B. Haktanırlar Ulutaş, “ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH”, Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, no. 13, pp. 125–138, June 2011.
ISNAD Haktanırlar Ulutaş, Berna. “ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH”. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal 13 (June 2011), 125-138.
JAMA Haktanırlar Ulutaş B. ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal. 2011;:125–138.
MLA Haktanırlar Ulutaş, Berna. “ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH”. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics E-Journal, no. 13, 2011, pp. 125-38.
Vancouver Haktanırlar Ulutaş B. ASSESSING THE RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENTS: TEACHING VS. RESEARCH. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal. 2011(13):125-38.