BibTex RIS Cite

Analyzing Turkish MA Students' Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts

Year 2010, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 49 - 62, 26.03.2012

Abstract

References

  • Burrough-Boenisch, J . (2005). NS and NNS scientists' amendment s of Dutch scientific English and their impact on hedging. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (1), 25-39.
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 post graduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 (2), 133-151 .
  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
  • Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland, Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-122). London: Longman.
  • Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academi c writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (3), 239-256.
  • Johns, A. (2001). Book review: hedging in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (2), 200-203.
  • Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kamler, B.& Thomson , P. (2004). Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 9 (2), 195-209.
  • Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academi c literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (1), 19-36.
  • Lewin, B.A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors' and readers' identification of 'toning down ' in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2), 163-178.
  • McEnery, T.& Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second language writers. In J . Flowerdew, Academic Discourse (pp. 182¬ 196). London: Longman.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 149-171 .
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (2000). Procrustes' recipe: hedging and positivism. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 175-187.
  • Silver, M. (2003). The stance of stance: a critical look at way s stance is expressed and modeled in academi c discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 359-374.
  • Swales, J . M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Varttala, T. (1999). Remark s on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.
Year 2010, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 49 - 62, 26.03.2012

Abstract

References

  • Burrough-Boenisch, J . (2005). NS and NNS scientists' amendment s of Dutch scientific English and their impact on hedging. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (1), 25-39.
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 post graduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13 (2), 133-151 .
  • Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
  • Hyland, K. (1999). Disciplinary discourses: articles. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland, Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 99-122). London: Longman.
  • Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academi c writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (3), 239-256.
  • Johns, A. (2001). Book review: hedging in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20 (2), 200-203.
  • Jordan, R.R. (1997). English for academic purposes: a guide and resource book for teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kamler, B.& Thomson , P. (2004). Driven to abstraction: doctoral supervision and writing pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 9 (2), 195-209.
  • Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academi c literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5 (1), 19-36.
  • Lewin, B.A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors' and readers' identification of 'toning down ' in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2), 163-178.
  • McEnery, T.& Kifle, N. A. (2002). Epistemic modality in argumentative essays of second language writers. In J . Flowerdew, Academic Discourse (pp. 182¬ 196). London: Longman.
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (2), 149-171 .
  • Salager-Meyer, F. (2000). Procrustes' recipe: hedging and positivism. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 175-187.
  • Silver, M. (2003). The stance of stance: a critical look at way s stance is expressed and modeled in academi c discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2 (4), 359-374.
  • Swales, J . M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Varttala, T. (1999). Remark s on the communicative functions of hedging in popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Arzu Ekoç

Publication Date March 26, 2012
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Ekoç, A. (2012). Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts. HAYEF Journal of Education, 7(1), 49-62.
AMA Ekoç A. Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts. HAYEF Journal of Education. March 2012;7(1):49-62.
Chicago Ekoç, Arzu. “Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts”. HAYEF Journal of Education 7, no. 1 (March 2012): 49-62.
EndNote Ekoç A (March 1, 2012) Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts. HAYEF Journal of Education 7 1 49–62.
IEEE A. Ekoç, “Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts”, HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2012.
ISNAD Ekoç, Arzu. “Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts”. HAYEF Journal of Education 7/1 (March 2012), 49-62.
JAMA Ekoç A. Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;7:49–62.
MLA Ekoç, Arzu. “Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts”. HAYEF Journal of Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2012, pp. 49-62.
Vancouver Ekoç A. Analyzing Turkish MA Students’ Use of Lexical Hedging Strategies in Theses Abstracts. HAYEF Journal of Education. 2012;7(1):49-62.