Blockchain Technology and Social Policy Transformation: A Critical Examination and Recommendations

Year 2024, Issue: 87, 15 - 23, 31.12.2024

Nurten Ebru Özdemir , Gökçe Cerev , Doğa Başar Sarıipek , Salih Tosun

https://doi.org/10.26650/jspc.2024.87.1468729

Abstract

In recent years, Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative innovation with significant implications on both a global and local scale. Its potential to revolutionise social policy in Turkey is profound and offers avenues for the development of transparent, reliable and participatory systems. As the concept of work evolves, traditional social protection and security systems rooted in conventional employment models must adapt to this changing landscape. In an era prioritising citizenship ties, the importance of financial stability and efficiency has never been greater, necessitating the formulation of precise needs-based social protection policies. Through its ability to enhance the accuracy of identifying individuals in need, the blockchain holds the promise of optimising resource allocation and facilitating the effective implementation of needs-based social policies. This study seeks to delve into the transformative potential of Blockchain technology within social policy systems in Turkey, with a specific focus on social assistance practices, and to provide recommendations for its integration. The significance of this study lies in its exploration of Blockchain’s decentralised digital structure of the blockchain, which ensures data integrity and is pivotal in establishing fair and transparent social assistance mechanisms. By pioneering research in this area, this study aims to bridge existing gaps in the literature and contribute to a deeper understanding of Blockchain’s impact on social assistance in Turkey. Methodologically, the study will start with an exhaustive review of the relevant literature to establish a robust conceptual and theoretical framework. Subsequently, the collected data will undergo descriptive analysis to provide comprehensive interpretation and reporting.

In conclusion, the findings of this study affirm the unique benefits that Blockchain technology offers to the social policy system in Turkey, including increased efficiency, equity, and transparency within social assistance systems. By addressing implementation challenges, Blockchain can be tailored to suit the needs of social assistance programs, providing invaluable support to policymakers and decision-makers in shaping future policies. The integration of Blockchain technologies not only facilitates efficient resource allocation but also enables timely and accurate responses to social protection needs. Ultimately, it enables the simultaneous implementation of a rights-based, needs-driven social policy model, thus paving the way for transformative changes in social welfare systems.

Keywords

Blockchain, Digital transformation, Social Assistance, Social Policy, Social Security

References

• Antonopoulos, A. (2014). Bitcoin security model: trust by computation. www.Forbes.com, February, 20. google scholar
• Akıncı, K. Y., ve Kaya, D. G. (2024). Vergilendirme aktörlerinin blockchain teknolojisi tutumları üzerine bir araştırma: Isparta ili örneği. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 15(42), 647-673. google scholar Altunbaşak, T. A. (2018). Blok zincir (Blockchain) teknolojisi ile vergilendirme. Maliye Dergisi, 174, 360-371. google scholar
• Atzori, M. (2015) Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Work Pap google scholar
• Borowik, G., Wawrzyniak, Z., & Cichosz, P. (2019). Blockchain technology—innovation and security. Przeglyd Policyjny, 136, 60-78. google scholar
• Buterin, V. (2014). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Ethereum. google scholar
• Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain. national bureau of economic research. retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w22952 google scholar
• Çatlı, M., ve Keskin, S. (2021). İnsan haklarının değişime açık konusu: dijital vatandaşlık kavramı üzerine bir inceleme. Ombudsman Akademik, 7(14), 199-229. google scholar
• Çaybaşı, G., ve Peker, İ. (2024). Blokzincir ve sosyal yardım kavramları üzerine bibliyometrik analiz. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(1), 100-117. google scholar
• Deloitte. (2017). Blockchain Technology and its Potential İn Taxes. Deloitte, 1-20. google scholar
• Di Pierro, M. (2017). What is the blockchain?. Computing in Science & Engineering, 19(5), 92-95. google scholar
• Fan, X. (2021). Charity supervision management system based on blockchain. ın 2021 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Management Technology (ICCSMT) (pp. 554-557). IEEE. google scholar
• Gadekallu, T. R., Huynh-The, T., Wang, W., Yenduri, G., Ranaweera, P., Pham, Q. V., ... & Liyanage, M. (2022). Blockchain for the metaverse: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.09738. google scholar
• Glaser F (2017) Pervasive decentralisation of digital infrastructures: a framework for blockchain enabled system and use case analysis. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2017), Waikoloa Village, Hawaii google scholar
• Golosova, J., & Romanovs, A. (2018, November). The advantages and disadvantages of the blockchain technology. In 2018 IEEE 6th workshop on advances in information, electronic and electrical engineering (AIEEE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
• Gündal, R. P. O. (2024), Blok zincir teknolojisinde kişisel verilerin korunması. Kişisel Verileri Koruma Dergisi, 6(1), 14-27. google scholar
• Mendi, A. F. (2021). Blokzincir mimarisi ve getirdiği fırsatlar. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (29), 181-186. google scholar
• Miller, M., & Valasek, C. (2016). The Role of Blockchain Technology in Digital Identity Verification. Journal of Cybersecurity. google scholar
• Mougayar, W. (2016). The business blockchain: promise, practice, and application of the next Internet technology. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
• Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf google scholar
• Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Narayanan, V. (2016). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press. google scholar
• Nofer, M., Gomber, P., Hinz, O., & Schiereck, D. (2017). Blockchain. Business & information systems engineering, 59, 183-187. google scholar
• Owens, J. & Jong, J. (2017). Taxation on the blockchain: opportunities and challenges. Tax Notes, 87 (2017), 117. google scholar
• Özpençe, Ö ve Noyan, E. (2022). Ekonomik faaliyetlerin dijitalleşmesi ve metaverse. Bölüm Yazarları, 1. google scholar
• Öztürk, M. (2021). Dijital vatandaşlık araştırmalarının incelenmesi: Kavramsal ve yöntemsel eğilimler. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 11(2), 385-393. google scholar
• Pineda, M., Jabba, D., & Nieto-Bernal, W. (2024). Blockchain architectures for the digital economy: trends and opportunities. Sustainability, 16(1), 442. google scholar
• Sarmah, S. S. (2018). Understanding blockchain technology. Computer Science and Engineering, 8(2), 23-29. google scholar
• Rossi, L., & Bianchi, G. (2024). Digital transformations in welfare provision: ımplications for social policy. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 1-6. google scholar
• Schou, J., & Hjelholt, M. (2019). Digitaliseringen af den danske offentlige sektor: hvor er vi pâ vej hen?. 0konomi & Politik, 92(2). google scholar
• Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain basics: a non-technical ıntroduction in 25 steps. apress. google scholar
• Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). Blockchain revolution: how the technology behind bitcoin ıs changing money, business, and the world. Penguin. google scholar
• Tether, B. (2018). The ımpact of blockchain on development and humanitarian efforts. Development Policy Review. google scholar
• Türkmen, S. Y., ve Durbilmez, S. E. (2019). Blockchain teknolojisi ve Türkiye finans sektöründeki durumu. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1), 30-45. google scholar
• Ünal, G., ve Uluyol, Ç. (2020). Blok zinciri teknolojisi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 13(2), 167-175. google scholar
• Zohar, A. (2015). Bitcoin: Under the Hood. Communications of the ACM, 58(9), 104-113. google scholar
• Yıldız, Y. (2019). Blok zincir teknolojisi ve vergi denetimi üzerine olası etkileri. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, 42(366), 55-63. google scholar
• Yapıcı, S., Oral, N., Yumuşak, R., ve Eren, T. (2021). Blokzincir teknolojisi ile merkezi ve dağıtık veri tabanının karşılaştırılması. Endüstri Mühendisliği, 32(3), 457-472. google scholar