Investigation of Organizational Power Distance Levels of Pilots Working on Airlines in Turkey: Flight Safety and Professional Courtesy Dilemma

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 187 - 205, 24.07.2022

Özlem Çapan Özeren , Şener Odabaşoğlu , Güray Tezer

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1110524

Abstract

This study aims to obtain new data that will mediate the development of safety culture by investigating the power distance, which is one of the cultural dimensions of communication, and causes accidents in aviation, through the assertiveness levels of the pilots and their social approval needs. The method of this research is quantitative, data were collected through online questionnaires. The population and the sample of the research are consisted of the civilian pilots in Turkey. The questionnaires were applied to 75 pilots. In male pilots participating in the study; The levels of "Instrumental Use of Power" and "Legitimation of Power", which are sub-dimensions of organizational power distance, are significantly higher than female pilots. In addition, it has been revealed that female pilots pay less attention to the judgments of others than male pilots. These results suggest that male pilots need more organizational power than female pilots. One of the results of the research is the strong positive relationship between the assertiveness level of the participants and "Consent to Power", which is one of the sub-dimensions of power distance; it is thought that this relationship stems from the social adaptation capacity of assertive individuals. The study also showed that the main factor determining the behavior of the employees is the organizational culture. Within this scope, sharing the accident reports of Turkish registered aircraft prepared by Transport Safety Investigation Center with researchers and institutions will contribute significantly to the need for resources.

Keywords

Organizational Power Distance, Aviation, Safety Culture, Assertiveness

References

• Acar, S. (2018). Güç Mesafesi Konusunda Yazılan Tezlerin İçerik Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi. UDTAŞ Uluslararsı Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, Afyonkarahisar, 23-25 Kasım.
• Benedict, M. E. and Edward, L. L. (1988). Delay and distortion: Tacit influences on performance appraisal effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 507-514.
• Bienefeld, N. and Gudela, G. (2014). Speaking up in ad hoc multiteam systems: Individual-level effects of psychological safety, status, and leadership within and across teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(6), 930-945.
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bolat, T. and Esra Duranay, E. (2018). Göze Girme Davranışları ve Güç Mesafesi İlişkisi ve Bir Alan Araştırması. International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 4(24), 5116-5126.
• Cameron, K. (2013). A process for changing organizational culture. In: Handbook of organizational development (Ed. T. G. Cummings). Thousand Oaks: Sage. 429-445.
• CAO.IRI, (2020, 10 Mar). Islamic Republic of Iran Civil Aviation Organization Aircraft Accident Investigation Board. Retrieved from: https://reports.aviation-safety.net/2018/20180311-0_CL60_TC-TRB.pdf
• Çağırkan, B. (2017). Kültür Sosyolojisinde Metodoloji Tartışmaları: İdeoloji Olarak Kültür ve Eylem Olarak Kültür. SDÜ Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 42,147-160.
• Çetingüç, M. (2021). Bin Bir Öykü ile Havacılık ve Uzay Psikolojisi. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Deal, T. E. and Allan, A. K. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Detert, J. R. and Amy, C. E. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Takenfor-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461-488.
• Driskell, J. E. and Eduardo, S. (1991). Group decision making under stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 473–478.
• Edmondson, A. (1999a). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
• Fogarty, M., et al. (2018). Aviation Non-Technical Skills Guidebook. Canberra, Australia: Defence Aviation Safety Authority.
• Freivalds, J. (2009). Culture crashes. MultiLingual.
• Güneş, T., et al. (2020). İnsan Faktörleri Yetkinliklerinin Hava Aracı Bakım İşletmelerinin Teknisyen Bulma ve Seçme Süreçlerinde Değerlendirilmesi Araştırma Makalesi, Uluslararası İnsan Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3(5), 179-200.
• İlhan, Ü. D. and Yemişçi, D. A. (2020). Ulusal Kültür, Örgüt Kültürü ve İş Güvenliği Kültürü İlişkisi: Hofstede’nin Güç Mesafesi ve Belirsizlikten Kaçınma Boyutları Açısından Türkiye Özelinde Bir Değerlendirme. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 27 (3), 703-724.
• İlhan, Ü. D. (2019). Kuşaklar açısından çalışma değerleri ve örgütsel bağlılık. Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel Yayıncılık.
• Jakubowski-Spector, P. (1973). Facilitating the Growth of Women Through Assertive Training. The Counseling Psychologist. 4(1), 75-86.
• Jing, H. S., Lu, C. J. and Shang-Jee P. (2001). Culture, Authoritarianism and Commercial Aircraft Accidents. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1, 341-359.
• Gladwell, M. (2009). Outliers (Çizginin Dışındakiler)-Bazı İnsanlar Neden Daha Başarılı Olur? Çev., Aytül Özer. İstanbul: Mediacat Yayıncılık.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. Trans., Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith. New York: International.
• Hofstede, G. and Peterson, M. F. (2000). Culture: National values and organizational practices. In: Handbook of organizational culture and climate (Ed. N. N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom), 401-416.
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations (Second Edition), Thousand Oaks-London-New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Karaşar, B. and Öğülmüş, S. (2016). Sosyal Onay İhtiyacı Ölçeği: Geçerlik Ve Güvenirlik Analizi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 84-104.
• Kast, F. E. and Rosenzweig, J. E. (1985). Organization and management. London: McGraw Hill
• Kottak, C. (2012). Mirror for humanity: An introduction to cultural anthropology. New York: McGraw Hill.
• Li, H., et al. (2009). The Differences of Aviation Human Factors between Individualism and Collectivism Culture. Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains. HCI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5613. Eds. J.A. Jacko. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
• Macit, G. and Erdem, R. (2020). Örgütsel Sessizliğe Dair Kavramsal Bir İnceleme. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18 (2), 93-114.
• Martinussen, M. and Hunter, D. R. (2010). Aviation Psychology and Human Factors. FL: CRC Press.
• Moshansky, V. (1992). Commission Of Inquiry Into The Air Ontario Crash At Dryden, Ontario. Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
• Morran, D. K., Stockton, R. and Bond, L. (1991). Delivery of positive and corrective feedback in counseling groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 410-414.
• Nahavandi, A. and Malekzadeh, A. R. (1999). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• NTSB, (1990). National Transportation Safety Board, 1990. Avianca, The Airline of Columbia Boeing 707-321B, HK 2026 Fuel Exhaustion Cove Neck, New York January 25,1990. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-91/04. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/accidentreports/reports/aar9104.pdf. Accessed: 02.06.2022
• NTSB, (2000). National Transportation Safety Board. Controlled Flight Into Terrain, Korean Air Flight 801, Boeing 747-300, HL7468, Nimitz Hill, Guam, August 6, 1997. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-00/01. Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/accidentreports/reports/aar0001.pdf. (Accessed: 02.06.2022)
• Reader, T. W. and O’Connor, P. (2014). The Deepwater Horizon explosion: Non-technical skills, safety culture, and system complexity. Journal of Risk Research, 17(3), 405–424.
• Rosen, S. and Tesser, A. (1970). On Reluctance to Communicate Undesirable Information: The MUM Effect. Sociometry, 33(3), 253–263.
• SHGM (2021). Faaliyet Raporu: 2021. Retrieved from: https://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/kurumsal/faaliyet/2021.pdf. (Accessed: 01.06.2022).
• SMS (2015) Retrievedfrom: https://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/mevzuat/sektorel/talimatlar/SHT-SMS_2.pdf. (Ac cessed: 02.06.2022).
• Simarmata, E. R. and Rahayu, A. (2018). Correlation between Assertiveness and Empathy with Adolescent's Social Adjustment in Social Home of South Jakarta. Universitas Indonesia International Psychology Symposium for Undergraduate Research (UIPSUR 2017). Atlantis Press.
• Solmaz, G. and Serinkan, C. (2020). Örgütlerde Güç Mesafesinin Örgütsel Sessizlik ile İlişkisi: Bir Alan Araştırması. Yeni Fikir Dergisi, 12 (25), 02-19
• Soeters, J. L. and Boer, P. C. (2000). Culture and Flight Safety in Military Aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10(2), 111-133.
• Syamsu Yusuf LN., Haji, 1952-. (2006). Psikologi perkembangan anak & remaja / H. Syamsu Yusuf L.N. ; pengantar, M. Djawab Dahlan. Bandung : Remaja Rosda karya,.
• Topçuoğlu, E. (2021). Örgütlerde iletişim sorunları kapsamında örgütsel sessizlik davranışının incelenmesi. Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3 (2), 225-230.
• Tear, R., et al. (2018). Safety culture and power: interactions between perceptions of safety culture, organisational hierarchy, and national culture. Safety Science, 12, 550-561.
• Tesser, A. and Rosen, S. (1972). Similarity of objective fate as a determinant of the reluctance to transmit unpleasant information: The MUM effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 46-53.
• Ustaömer, T. C. (2020). Havacılıkta Emniyet Kültürünün Ölçümüne Yönelik Bir Araç Geliştirme: Türk Pilotlar Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
• Ustaömer, T. C. and Şengür, F.(2020). Havacılıkta Emniyet Kültürü: Reason’ın Emniyet Kültürü Modelinin İncelenmesi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
• Voltan, N. (1980). Rathus Atılganlık Envanteri geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Psikoloji Dergisi, 3(10), 23-25.
• Wasti, S. A. (1995). Kültürel farklılaşmanın örgütsel yapı ve davranışa etkileri: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Geliştirme Dergisi, 22, 503-529.
• Yorulmaz, Ç., et al. (2018). Örgütsel Güç Mesafesi Ölçeği Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 8(4), 671-686.