Physicians Occupational Health and Occupational Diseases Attitude Scale Development

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 627 - 636, 31.05.2022

Giray Kolcu , Ayşe Coşkun Beyan , Gökmen Özceylan

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1060766

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Occupational diseases (ODs) and work-related diseases are important issues that affect work life and involve economic, medical, social, and ethical dimensions. The aim of this study was to develop a scale to measure the attitudes of physicians working or likely to work on the diagnosis and notification of ODs toward occupational health and OD.
Methods: This study was planned as a scale development study. During the scale development process, the item pool was determined using the three-round Delphi method, and explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed using the pilot study data.
Results: A pilot study was conducted for the validity of the scale (n = 142). Data were collected again for confirmatory factor analysis of the scale (n = 216). In the confirmatory factor analysis it was decided that the model had the capacity to measure the attitude of physicians toward occupational health and diseases. In the reliability analyses of the scale, the scale was found to be reliable.
Conclusion: The “Attitude Scale toward Occupational Health and Occupational Diseases for Physicians,” developed in this study, is a valid and reliable tool to determine the attitude of physicians toward occupational health and ODs.

Keywords

occupational health, occupational disease, scale development, validity, reliability

References

• 1. Fişek G. 2014 İş Kazalarının Maliyeti [Internet]. European Union. 2016. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Structural_business_statistics_overview
• 2. Erol İ. Ülkemiz Madencilik Sektöründe Görülen Meslek Hastalıklarının Ġncelenmesi Investigation of Occupational Diseases Seen in Mining Sector in Turkey. Çukurova Univ J Fac Eng Archit. 2020;35(4):859–72.
• 3. Alagüney M. The Estimated Number of Occupational Diseases and Work-Related Diseases in Turkey. Acta Medica Cordoba. 2019 Sep 30;50.
• 4. Beyan A C Demiral Y. Meslek hastaliklari ve sürveyans. Mesleki Sağlık ve Güvenlik Derg. 2017;9:89–95.
• 5. Keçeci Ş. 2010 - 2016 Yılları Arasında Türkiye’de Beklenen ve Tespit Edilen Meslek Hastalıkları Sayılarının Karşılaştırılması. ASHD. 2019;18(2):49–57.
• 6. SGK. SGK İstatistik Yıllıkları [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari
• 7. Özlü A. Çalışan Sağlığı Daire Başkanlığı Faaliyetleri [Internet]. Ankara; 2017. Available from: http://www.hisam.hacettepe.edu.tr/fizikseletkensemp100118/ahmetozlu.pdf
• 8. Aile Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı. Ulusal Düzeyde Meslek Hastalıkları ve İş ile İlişkili Hastalıklar Tanı ve Bildirim Rehberi [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ailevecalisma.gov.tr/medias/4597/rehber20.pdf
• 9. Aile Çalışma ve Sosyal Hizmetler Bakanlığı. Meslek Hastalıkları ve İş İle İlgili Hastalıklar Tanı Rehberi [Internet]. Available from: https://ailevecalisma.gov.tr/media/1340/meslekhastaliklari.pdf
• 10. ILO. National System for Recording and Notification of Occupational Diseases [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/documents/publication/wcms_210950.pdf
• 11. WHO. Occupational and work-related diseases [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/occupational_health/activities/occupational_ work_diseases/en/
• 12. Lele DV. OCcupational Health Surveillance. Indian J Occup Environ Med [Internet]. 2018;22(3):117–20. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30647512
• 13. Yıldız AN, Piskin TM, Alaguney ME, Kurt OK, Ozlu A, Basarali MK. Attitudes and behaviors of family physicians regarding occupational diseases. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2019;74(1–2):85–92.
• 14. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach [Internet]. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. 2009. 272 p. Available from: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yEd7XsJbYwwC&pgis=1
• 15. Brender J, Nøhr C, McNair P. Research needs and priorities in health informatics. Int J Med Inform. 2000;58–59:257–89.
• 16. Tay L, Jebb A. Scale Development. In 2016.
• 17. Vasudevan V, Rimmer JH, Kviz F. Development of the Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairments. Disabil Health J. 2015 Oct;8(4):547–56.
• 18. Armstrong TS, Cohen MZ, Eriksen L, Cleeland C. Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005 May;32(3):669–76.
• 19. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
• 20. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2017.
• 21. Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual life Res an Int J Qual life Asp Treat care Rehabil. 2003 May;12(3):229–38.
• 22. Saw SM, Ng TP. The design and assessment of questionnaires in clinical research. Singapore Med J. 2001;42(3):131–5.
• 23. Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J caring Sci. 2015 Jun;4(2):165–78.
• 24. Shi J, Mo X, Sun Z. [Content validity index in scale development]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012;37(2):152–5.
• 25. Rodrigues IB, Adachi JD, Beattie KA, MacDermid JC. Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):540.
• 26. Zait A, Bertea P. Methods for Testing Discriminant Validity. Manag Mark J. 2011 Jan 1;IX:217–24.
• 27. Ringle, Christian M., Wende, Sven, & Becker J-M. SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.smartpls.com
• 28. Jr H, Risher J, Sarstedt M, Ringle C. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2018 Dec 1;31.
• 29. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd Editio. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages; 1978.
• 30. Nunnally, J. & Bernstein JC. Psychometric theory. New York/London: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages; 1994.
• 31. Field A. Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windoows. London: Thousand Oaks; 2003.
• 32. Yaşlıoğlu MM. Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik : Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması [Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses]. Istanbul Univ J Sch Bus. 2017;46:74–85.
• 33. Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 2nd editio. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1992.
• 34. Rex B. Kline. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2005.
• 35. Daire Hooper et al. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. 2008.
• 36. Hu, L., & Bentler PM. Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
• 37. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(2):130–149.
• 38. Atılgan H. Genellenebilirlik Kuramı ve Uygulaması. 1. Baskı. Ankara; 2019. 1 p.
• 39. Kolcu G, Başer Kolcu Mİ. Tıp Eğitiminde Genellenebilirlik Kuramı Uygulaması Generalizability Theory Application in Medical Education. Smyrna Tıp Derg. 2019;2(15):48–51.
• 40. Rigotti T, Schyns B, Mohr G. A Short Version of the Occupational Self-Efficacy Scale: Structural and Construct Validity Across Five Countries. J Career Assess. 2008 May 1;16.
• 41. Zhang Y, Flum M, West C, Punnett L. Assessing Organizational Readiness for a Participatory Occupational Health/Health Promotion Intervention in Skilled Nursing Facilities. Health Promot Pract [Internet]. 2015/02/24. 2015 Sep;16(5):724–32. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25715335