The Effect of Home Safety Education Program Given to Mothers with Children with Intellectual Disability on Their Attitudes towards Safety Measures for Home Accidents

Year 2022, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 455 - 464, 31.05.2022

Eda Kılınç , Fadime Hatice İnci , Asiye Kartal

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1063661

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of the Home Safety Education Program given to mothers with children with intellectual disability on their attitudes towards safety measures.
Methods: This study, in a single group semi-experimental design, was carried out in a Special Education Application Center in 2020 (n= 29 mothers). The Scale for Mother’s Identification of Safety Measures against Home Accidents was used as data collection tool in the study. The Home Safety Education Program, consisting of 3 sessions for 2 weeks, was applied to the participants for home accidents. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyze the data.
Results: Sixty-five percent of children with intellectual disability have had a home accident in the last year. The most common type of home accident is falling with 51.7%. A statistically significant difference was observed between the pre-education and post-education attitude scores regarding safety measures for home accidents of the mothers (Z= 4.704, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The study shows that mothers with children with intellectual disability can learn the necessary information and gain a positive attitude to keep their children safe in the home environment.

Keywords

Intellectual disability, children; home accidents, injuries, education program

References

• 1. Peden M. World report on child injury prevention appeals to “Keep Kids Safe”. Injury Prevention 2008; 14: 413-414.
• 2. World Health Organization (WHO). Injuries. Retrieved November 17, 2020 available from: http://www.who.int/topics/injuries/en/
• 3. Jernbro C, Bonander C, Beckman L. The association between disability and unintentional injuries among adolescents in a general education setting: evidence from a Swedish population-based school survey. Disability and Health Journal 2020; 13(1): 100841.
• 4. White D, McPherson L, Lennox N, Ware RS. Injury among adolescents with intellectual disability: A prospective cohort study. Injury 2018; 49(6): 1091-1096.
• 5. Lee L, Harrington RA, Chang JJ, Connors SL. Increased risk of injury in children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2008; 29(3): 247–255.
• 6. Myers-Turnbull A. Why Are Children with Autism Injured in Accidents More Frequently? Factors Affecting Unintentional Injury in Children with Autism. 2018; Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University.
• 7. Brenner RA, Taneja GS, Schroeder TJ, Trumble AC, Moyer PM, Louis GMB. Unintentional injuries among youth with developmental disabilities in the United States, 2006–2007. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 2013; 20(3): 259–265.
• 8. Xiang H, Stallones L, Chen G, Hostetler SG, Kelleher K. Non fatal injuries among US children with disabling conditions. American Journal of Public Health 2005; 95(11): 1970-1975.
• 9. Ramirez M, Fillmore E, Chen A, Peek-Asa C. A comparison of school injuries between children with and without disabilities. Academic Pediatrics 2010; 10(5): 317–322.
• 10. Sherrard J, Tonge BJ. Ozanne‐Smith J. Injury in young people with intellectual disability: descriptive epidemiology. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention. 2001; 7: 56–61.
• 11. Shooshtari S, Brownell M, Mills RS, Dik N, Yu DC, Chateau D, Wetzel M. Comparing health status, health trajectories and use of health and social services between children with and without developmental disabilities: A population‐based longitudinal study in Manitoba. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2017; 30(4): 584-601.
• 12. Çelik S. Nursing Role on Prevention of Injury/Accident to People with Mental Disability. Journal of Contemporary Medicine 2014; 4(2): 100-97.
• 13. Tsoumakas K, Dousis E, Mavridi F, Gremou A, Matziou V. Parent's adherence to children's home‐accident preventive measures. International Nursing Review 2009; 56(3): 369-374.
• 14. İnanç DÇ, Baysal SU, Çetin Z, Coşgun L, Taviloğlu K, Ünüvar E. Injury control in childhood: Family’s attitude and safety counseling. Turkish Pediatrics Archive 2008; 43(4): 127-134.
• 15. Turan T, Altundağ Dündar S, Yorgancı M, Yıldırım Z. The prevention of home accidents among children aged 0-6 years. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 2010; 16(6): 552-557.
• 16. Satır G. Assessment of Training Given to Parents of Children with Mental Disabilities in The Prevention of Domestic Accidents (Master Thesis). 2018. T.C. Okan University Health Science Institute, Nursing Department. Istanbul/Turkey.
• 17. Kahriman İ, Karadeniz H. Effects of a Safety-Awareness–Promoting Program Targeting Mothers of Children Aged 0–6 Years to Prevent Pediatric Injuries in the Home Environment: Implications for Nurses. Journal of Trauma Nursing. 2018; 25(5): 327-335.
• 18. Çapık C, Gürol AP. Effect of education on mothers' capability of identification of safety precautions of home accidents. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 2014; (3): 87-94.
• 19. Özakar Akça S, Çankaya T, Aydın Z. Diagnostic levels of Mothers having Children between the age of 0-6 years about Taking Precautions against Home Accidents and the Effects of Training on Home Accidents. J Contemp Med 2017; 7(1): 50-57.
• 20. Kendrick D, Young B, Mason‐Jones AJ, Ilyas N, Achana FA, Cooper NJ, Mulvaney C. Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention. Evidence‐Based Child Health: a Cochrane Review Journal 2013; 8(3): 761-939.
• 21. Morrongiello BA, Zdzieborski D, Sandomierski M, Munroe K. Results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the efficacy of the Supervising for Home Safety program: Impact on mothers’ supervision practices. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2013; 50: 587-595.
• 22. Yıldırım Sarı H, Girli A, Ozturk Ozgonenel S, Rowley H. Determination of injury risks and safety measures taken by mothers of children with an intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 2016; 27(2): 95-103.
• 23. Sherrard J, Ozanne‐Smith J, Staines C. Prevention of unintentional injury to people with intellectual disability: a review of the evidence. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2004; 48(7): 639-645.
• 24. Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği. Resmî Gazete (Sayı: 31152). (2020). http://orgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_06/24163215_ozel_eYitim_yonetmeliYi_son_hali.pdf
• 25. Çınar N, Görak G. “0-6 Yaş Çocuklarda Annenin Ev Kazalarına Yönelik Güvenlik Önlemlerini Tanılama Ölçeği”nin geliştirilmesi, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Çocuk Forumu 2003;6(1): 22-7.
• 26. Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32(3): 221-233.
• 27. Limbos MA, Ramirez M, Park LS, Peek-Asa C, Kraus JF. Injuries to the head among children enrolled in special education. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2004; 158(11): 1057–1061.
• 28. Altundağ S, Öztürk C. Ev kazalarına yönelik eğitimin, güvenlik önlemleri alınması ve kaza görülme sıklığına etkisi. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2007; 13(3): 180-185.
• 29. King W, LeBlanc JC, Barrowman NJ, Klassen TP, Bernard-Bonnin AC, Robitaille Y, Pless IB. Long term effects of a home visit to prevent childhood injury: three year follow up of a randomized trial. Injury Prevention 2005; 11(2): 106-109.