A Behavioral Approach to the Effects of the Gender of Voice on the Dichotic Listening Test Performance

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 137 - 142, 31.01.2024

Emre Eskicioğlu , Çağdaş Güdücü , Murat Özgören

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1313320

Abstract

A Behavioral Approach to the Effects of the Gender of Voice on the Dichotic Listening Test Performance

Abstract

Background and Purpose: In the dichotic listening test, not only the asymmetry of the auditory system is evaluated but also the associated cognitive processes. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of male and female voices on dichotic listening.
Methods: Participants consisted of 10 men and 14 women, aged 18–45 (28.54±6.23) without neurological or auditory disorders. The dichotic listening test was applied to four different sessions. These sessions: female voices in both ears, male voices in both ears, male and female voices in both ears (mono session), male voices in the right ear, female voices in the left ear, and female voices in the right ear, and male voices in the left ear (stereo).
Results: It was determined that brain lateralization was significantly reduced in the female session compared with the stereo session; in other words, right ear dominance decreased (p=0.026, d=-0.293). It was determined that there was a significant difference between the number of errors in male and stereo sessions.
Conclusion: Participants preferred the syllables voiced with male voice more in mono and stereo sessions. It is observed that female participants mostly prefer syllables voiced with a male voice, and male participants prefer syllables voiced with a female voice.

Keywords

dichotic listening test, gender of voice effect, ear dominance

References

• Ozgoren M, Bayazit O, Oniz A, Hugdahl K. Amplitude and phase-shift effects on dichotic listening performance. International Journal of Audiology 2012;51(8):591-596.
• Sætrevik B, Hugdahl K. Endogenous and exogenous control of attention in dichotic listening. Neuropsychology 2007;21(3):285.
• Rimol LM, Eichele T, Hugdahl K. The effect of voice-onset-time on dichotic listening with consonant–vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia 2006;44(2):191-196.
• Davidson RJ. Anterior electrophysiological asymmetries, emotion, and depression: Conceptual and methodological conundrums. Psychophysiology 1998;35(5):607-614.
• Falkenberg LE, Specht K, Westerhausen R. Attention and cognitive control networks assessed in a dichotic listening fMRI study. Brain and Cognition 2011;76(2):276-285.
• Hugdahl K. Symmetry and asymmetry in the human brain. European Review 2005;13(S2): 119-133. Hugdahl K, Westerhausen R, Alho K, Medvedev S, Laine M, Hämäläinen H. Attention and cognitive control: Unfolding the dichotic listening story. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 2009; 50(1):11-22.
• Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967; 3(2): 163-178. Kinsbourne M. The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologica 1970;33:193-201.
• Broadbent DE. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1954;47(3):191.
• Hugdahl K, Davidson RJ, editors. The asymmetrical brain. MIT press, CA; 2003.
• Ozgoren M, Erdogan U, Bayazit O, Taslica S, Oniz A. Brain asymmetry measurement using EMISU (embedded interactive stimulation unit) in applied brain biophysics. Computers in Biology and Medicine 2009;39(10):879-888.
• Prete G, Fabri M, Foschi N, Tommasi L. Voice gender categorization in the connected and disconnected hemispheres. Social Neuroscience 2020;15(4):385-397.
• Luders E, Narr KL, Thompson PM, Rex DE, Jancke L, Toga AW. Hemispheric asymmetries in cortical thickness. Cerebral Cortex 2006;16(8): 1232-1238.
• Hickok G, Poeppel D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007;8(5):393-402.
• Weston PS, Hunter MD, Sokhi DS, Wilkinson ID, Woodruff PW. Discrimination of voice gender in the human auditory cortex. NeuroImage 2015; 105:208-214.
• Sommer IE, Aleman A, Somers M, Boks MP, Kahn RS. Sex differences in handedness, asymmetry of the planum temporale and functional language lateralization. Brain Research 2008;1206:76-88.
• Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening in the study of auditory laterality. In: Hugdahl K, Davidson RJ, editors. The Asymmetrical Brain. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA; 2003. p. 441–476
• Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Eichele T. Age effects in dichotic listening to consonantvowel syllables: interactions with attention. Developmental Neuropsychology 2001;20(1):445-457.
• Wallentin M. Putative sex differences in verbal abilities and language cortex: A critical review. Brain and Language 2009; 108(3): 175-183.
• Reynard P, Joly CA, Damien M, Le Normand MT, Veuillet E, Thai-Van H. Age-Related Dichotic Listening Skills in Impaired and Non-Impaired Readers: A Comparative Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023;12(2):666.