Purpose - In this study, we make an
empirical research and a comparison study on econometric models used with
logistic link functions. We compare the predictive powers of models in credit
granting process.
Methodology - We collected data belonging
to 87 medium sized companies. 21 of these companies are defaulted. The data set
includes 15 continuous financial ratios for estimation of the models. We
implement three models which are Logistic Regression, Generalized Partially
Linear Models(GPLM) and Generalized Additive Models(GAM). For each model the
best fitted model is selected according to AIC criteria.
Findings- GPLM have
pointed out that the equity turnover ratio has a significant nonparametric effect.
On the other hand GAM pointed out that (total liability)/(total assets) and
Increase in Sales have significant nonparametric effects. Comparison of the
models have implemented according to their accuracy ratios, Type I and Type II
errors. Results show that generalized additive model with logistic link
outperforms both Logistic Regression and generalized partially linear model in
terms of three performance measures.
Conclusion- After
1980s as a result of the financial crises the default events become a main
issue of the credit agencies. For this reason, a credit agency’ objective is to
determine whether a credit application should be granted or refused. Here, the problem is to learn default
some time before the default event occurs. The empirical studies in this area
have indicated that commonly used classification methods are good to detect
signals of defaults. Especially the models which allow logistic link function
are good choices for modeling default risk. In this study we mainly focused on the
generalized linear models and its semi- and non-parametric extensions with
logistic link function. We compare their performances in a credit granting
procedure. We use a real data
belonging to Turkish SMEs. Our results show that the GAM outperforms the other
two models and it will be a good choice for credit granting procedure.
Journal Section | Articles |
---|---|
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 30, 2017 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 2 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.