Abstract
References
- Arthur, W. B. (2007). “The Structure of Invention,” Research Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 274-287.
- Barnett, H. G. (1953). Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Baumol, W. J. (2002). The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Elster, J. (1983). Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gilfillan, S. C. (1935). The Sociology of Invention, Cambridge: Follett.
- Goddin, B. (2008). “Innovation: the History of a Category,” Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No. 1.
- Kaempffert, W. (1930).Invention and Society, Chicago: American Library Association.
- Köhler, W. (1926).The Mentality of Apes, London: Harcourt, Brace.
- Maclaurin, W. R. (1950). “The Process of Technological Innovation: The Launching of a New Scientific Industry,”American Economic Review, Vol. 60, pp. 90-112.
- Nelson, R. R. (1959). “The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature,” The Journal of Business, Vol. 32, pp. 101-127.
- Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature, New York: B. W. Huebsch, Inc.
- Rosenberg, N. (1974). “Science, Invention and Economic Growth,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 84, No. 333, pp. 90-108.
- Ruttan, V. W. (1959). “Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 73(4), pp. 596-606.
- Schumpeter, J.A. (1939).Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). “The Creative Response in Economic History,”The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 149-159.
- Schumpeter, J.A. (1912), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Solo, C. S. (1951). “Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian Theory,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 65, pp. 417-28.
- Taussing, F. W. (1915). Inventors and Money-Makers. New York: The Macmillan Company.
- Usher, A. P. (1929). A History of Mechanical Inventions, New York: Dover.
- Usher, A. P. (1955). “Technical Change and Capital Formation” in Capital Formation and Economic Growth, National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Abstract
Purpose- In this paper we
investigate the difference between invention and innovation. Since theories of
invention are rare in the literature, this subject deserves the appropriation
of proper attention. In the economics of competitive market, there is an
important distinction between invention and innovation.
Methodology- We use qualitative and historical-narrative methodology. An
invention is devoid of economic value unless it is put into practical use and
consumption. An abstract idea may be an important invention. But it takes an
entrepreneur to transform the abstract invention into a marketable product. By
“getting things done,” the entrepreneur produces economic value and thereby
utility.
Findings- The entrepreneur
produces utilities by arranging, designing or re-organizing things in a new way
that were not done before. On the other hand, the inventor creates ideas to
produce something new that was inexistent beforehand.
Conclusion- The task of inventor
may seem more essential at first. However, as far as competitive economy is
concerned, the function of innovative entrepreneur is determinant in economic
change and development. An inventor becomes entrepreneur if endeavor in
invention is transformed into labor in entrepreneurship.
References
- Arthur, W. B. (2007). “The Structure of Invention,” Research Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 274-287.
- Barnett, H. G. (1953). Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Baumol, W. J. (2002). The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Elster, J. (1983). Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Gilfillan, S. C. (1935). The Sociology of Invention, Cambridge: Follett.
- Goddin, B. (2008). “Innovation: the History of a Category,” Project on the Intellectual History of Innovation, Working Paper No. 1.
- Kaempffert, W. (1930).Invention and Society, Chicago: American Library Association.
- Köhler, W. (1926).The Mentality of Apes, London: Harcourt, Brace.
- Maclaurin, W. R. (1950). “The Process of Technological Innovation: The Launching of a New Scientific Industry,”American Economic Review, Vol. 60, pp. 90-112.
- Nelson, R. R. (1959). “The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature,” The Journal of Business, Vol. 32, pp. 101-127.
- Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature, New York: B. W. Huebsch, Inc.
- Rosenberg, N. (1974). “Science, Invention and Economic Growth,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 84, No. 333, pp. 90-108.
- Ruttan, V. W. (1959). “Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 73(4), pp. 596-606.
- Schumpeter, J.A. (1939).Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). “The Creative Response in Economic History,”The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 149-159.
- Schumpeter, J.A. (1912), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Solo, C. S. (1951). “Innovation in the Capitalist Process: A Critique of the Schumpeterian Theory,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 65, pp. 417-28.
- Taussing, F. W. (1915). Inventors and Money-Makers. New York: The Macmillan Company.
- Usher, A. P. (1929). A History of Mechanical Inventions, New York: Dover.
- Usher, A. P. (1955). “Technical Change and Capital Formation” in Capital Formation and Economic Growth, National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 30, 2017 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 2 |
Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.