Giftedness and mathematics education: a bibliometric analysis

Year 2023, Volume: 11 Issue: 3 - September 2023, 439 - 465, 02.10.2023

Ayşe Arzu Arı , Barış Demir , Ebru Çakır

https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1356545

Abstract

The aim of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of the articles written in the field of mathematics related to gifted students. Bibliometric analysis is the numerical examination of publications produced in a specific field and in a limited period and the relationships between these publications. The analysis included 104 research articles published in Turkish journals between 2010 and 2023 and accessed by searching Google Scholar, Dergipark and ULAKBIM databases. It is seen that the majority of the articles were written in 2020 (f: 18) and in Turkish (74%). A total of 52 articles by authors from 52 different institutions were found, and most of these articles belonged to MoNE teachers (f: 59, 27%). It was also found that the articles in this field were published in 69 different journals and the journals that published the most articles were "Turkish Journal of Gifted Intelligence" (5%) and "Journal of Gifted Education and Creavity" (5%). A total of 165 authors' publications on giftedness and mathematics were found and the authors who published the most were Avni Yıldız (f: 5) and Serdal Baltacı (f: 5). A total of 1244 words were used in the titles of the published articles and the words "gifted" (f: 57), "gifted" (f: 52), "students" (f: 41), "mathematics" (f: 37), "problem" (f: 31) were prominent. In the articles, 240 different keywords were used; "gifted students" (f: 18), "gifted students" (f: 16), "gifted students" (f: 12) and "problem solving" (f: 10) were the most preferred keywords. In 67% of the studies, fewer than 100 people were studied and the sample of students (f: 81, 78%) was preferred more. When the articles in the field of giftedness and mathematics were analyzed in terms of their purposes, "problem solving" (f: 24) and "STEM" (f: 13) came to the fore. In addition, 51 different scales were used in the analyzed articles and the most preferred scales were "Problem Solving Inventory (Heppner & Petersen, 1982)" (f: 4, 8%) and "Learning Styles Inventory (Kolb, 1984)" (f: 3, 6%). A total of 3364 different sources were cited in 104 articles; the most cited source in the field of giftedness was "Education of the Gifted and Talented (Davis G. A. & Rimm S.B., 1998)" (f: 16).

Keywords

Giftedness, Mathematics Education, Bibliometric Analysis

References

• Aydemir, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of articles published on geometry education based on WoS Database (Master's thesis). Amasya University, Amasya.
• Aydın, Ş. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Publications on Mathematics and Creativity with VOSviewer. In Akkaya, G. (Ed.), International Congress on Gifted and Talented Education (Full Text Paper), 227-229, Ankara. E-ISBN: 978-605-7853-76-9.
• Ayvacı, H.Ş. and Bebek, G. (2019). A study on the thematic analysis of theses on gifted and talented in Turkey. Journal of Pamukkale University Faculty of Education, 45, 267-292.
• Baykul, Y. (2014). Mathematics Teaching in Primary Education 6th-8th. For Grades. Ankara: Pegem.
• Bayrak, A. (2022). A bibliometric study on realistic mathematics education (Master's thesis). Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat
• Bıçakçı, M., & Baloğlu, M. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research on personality traits of gifted students (1957-2020). Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Education, 34(Special Issue), 125-157. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.845218
• Bolat, Y., & Tekin, M. (2017). Trends in gifted education research: a methodological analysis. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 8(27), 609-629.
• Bulgurcu, S. (2021). Analysis of international doctoral dissertations in the field of giftedness (2010-2020). Journal of University Research, 4(2), 137-153.
• Bulut, N. (1988). Human and Mathematics, Izmir: Delta Bilim Publications.
• Çelik, C., Kaymakçı, G., & Can, Ş, (2023). Bibliometric analysis of research on career development of gifted students, E-International Journal of Educational Research, 14 (2), 68-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1206389
• Dede, E. & Özdemir, E. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Noticing Skill in Mathematics Education. Bayburt Education Faculty Journal, 17 (36), 1547-1571. DOI: 10.35675/befdergi.1145811
• Demirci, N., & Işık Tertemiz, N. (2022). A thematic review study on mathematics education studies published in gifted education journals. International Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 10 (19), 381-410.
• Dönmez, İ. & İdin, Ş. (2017). An Investigation of Research on the Education of Gifted Students in the Field of Science Education in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 4 (2), 57-74.
• Erdoğan, S. C. (2014). The effect of differentiated science and technology teaching based on scientific creativity on achievement, attitude and creativity of gifted and talented students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Istanbul University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.).
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., & Carroll, S. R. (2013). The impact of advanced geometry and measurement curriculum units on the mathematics achievement of first-grade students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 71-84.
• Gifted and Talented Students in Turkey. Participatory Educational Research, 9 (6), 19-40. DOI: 10.17275/per.22.127.9.6
• Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and Research Trends of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Mapping Analysis and Systematic Review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math9060584
• Inan, E. & Mert Uyangör, S. (2022). A Thematic Analysis of Theses Prepared on Mathematics Education with Journal of Graduate School of Educational Sciences, 4 (8), 48-65. DOI: 10.29129/inujgse.370573
• Kadıoğlu Ateş, H. & Mazı, M. G. (2017). An Overview of Graduate Theses on Gifted Education in Turkey. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 4 (3), 33-57.
• Kaya, D. (2021). Thematic and Methodological Trends of Theses on Gifted and Talented in Mathematics Education in Turkey. International Journal of Science and Education, 4 (3), 157-178. DOI: 10.47477/ubed.917732
• Kaya, N. G., Mertol, H., Turhan, G., Araz, D. & Uçar, H. (2022). Investigation of Graduate Theses on Differentiation and Enrichment Practices in the Education of Gifted Students. Journal of Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 0 (41), 102-114.
• Kırnık, D., & Susam, E. (2018). Analysis of Theses on Gifted Students. In Akkaya, G. and Ertekin, P. (Ed.), International Congress on Gifted and Talented Education (Full Text Paper), 99-108, Malatya. ISBN-978-975-8573-83-7.
• Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kurtuluş, M. A. & Yılmaz, S. (2022). A Different Perspective on STEM Education Studies: Bibliometric Mapping. Journal of Science Teaching, 10 (2), 386-405. DOI: 10.56423/fbod.1172514
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. (2nd Edition). California: SAGE Publications.
• Miller, R. C. (1990). Discovering mathematical talent. Reston, VA: Eric Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children.
• MONE. (2016). Ministry of National Education, Science and Art Centers Directive. Ankara: MoNE Publications.
• Muhammad, I., Darmayanti, R., & Arif, V. R. (2023). Discovery Learning Research in Mathematics Learning: A Bibliometric Review. Delta-Phi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 72-84.
• Nacar, S. (2017). Studies on Mathematics Education of Gifted Students Between 2005-2014. İnönü University
• National Association of Gifted Children (2006). What is Gifted? http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=574
• Nuhoğlu, H. & Kara, F. (2022). An Investigation of Graduate Education Theses in the Field of Special Ability in Turkey (2015-2020). 21st Century Education and Society, 11 (32), 341-362.
• Olkun, S. & Toluk Uçar, Z. (2006). Basic Mathematics II realistic and conceptual approach for prospective classroom teachers. Ankara: Tek Ağaç Eylül.
• Özenç, E. G. & Özenç, M. (2013). A Multidimensional Investigation of Graduate Education Theses on Gifted Students in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Social Research, 171 (171), 13-28.
• Özkaya, A. (2018). Bibliometric Analysis of the Studies in the Field of Mathematics Education. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(22), 723-734.
• Özkaya, A. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Publications in the Field of STEM Education. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8 (2), 590-628. DOI: 10.14686/buefad.450825
• Phan, T. T., Do, T. T., Trinh, T. H., Tran, T., Duong, H. T., Trinh, T. P. T., Do, B. C., & Nguyen, T. T. (2022). A bibliometric review on realistic mathematics education in Scopus database between 1972-2019. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1133-1149. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1133
• Poçan, S. (2023). Bibliometric Analysis on Digital Game-Based Learning in Mathematics Education. Journal of Inonu University Faculty of Education, 24 (1), 648-669. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.1215903
• Renzulli, J. S. (1985). Are teacher of gifted specialist? A land mark desicion on employment practices in special education for gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 24-29.)
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model of creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York, Cambridge University Press.
• Sak, U. (2020). Gifted children. Ankara: Vize Academic Publications
• Sak, U. (2020). Models and strategies in gifted education. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
• Sak, U. and Maker, C. J. (2004). Discover assessment and curriculum model: The application of theories of multiple intelligences and successful intelligence in the education of gifted students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 5 (15), 1-15.
• Şengil Akar, Ş. (2017). Investigation of gifted students' mathematical creativity in the process of mathematical modeling activities. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Sezgin, O. (2020). Concepts in Psychology and Psycho-philosophical Perspective on the Concept of Superior/Special (Intelligence, Potential, Ability). Çocuk ve Medeniyet, 5 (10), 319-335.
• Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17 (1), 20-36.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (1995). What do we mean by giftedness? A pentagonal implicit theory. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), pp. 88-94.
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and Nurture of Giftedness. (Ed. Colangelo, N. and G. Davis, G.) Handbook of Gifted Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Tortop, H. S. (2016). Why thought experiments should be used as an educational tool to develop creativity and problem solving skills of gifted students? Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 3 (2), 35-48.
• Tsui, B. P. H. (2017). How to address the needs of mathematically gifted students? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Toronto.
• Türk, E. (2018). Are Science High School Students Gifted? The Importance of Science High Schools in Gifted Education. Milli Eğitim, 47(1), 437 - 443. University, Antalya
• Uzun, M. (2004). Handbook of gifted children. Istanbul: Child Foundation.
• Wagner, H. and Zimmermann, B. (1986). Identification and fostering of mathematically gifted students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 243-259.
• Welch, J. (1987). The individual needs of gifted children. Support for Learning, 2(4), 19-26.