Ecologic Impact Analysis of Construction Materials

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 19 - 24, 28.12.2018

Figen Balo , Lutfu S.sua

Abstract

This research’s purpose is to assess the ecological
effect produced by the building materials, by means of the ecological impact
analysis implementation. The study aims to investigate the ecological impact of
the main construction materials based on various criteria exist in the
literature. The effect of eight different fundamental construction materials
(glass, shingles, ceramics, iron-steel, wood, concrete, copper, aluminum) on
the environment is of big concern and environmentally conscious designed
constructions are essentially demanded. By considering the construction
materials’ nine different environmental impacts (photochemical oxidation,
terrestrial eco-toxicity, freshwater aquatic eco-toxicity, human toxicity,
stratospheric ozone depletion, climate change, water demand, global warming
potential, primary energy demand) and two other physical properties (density,
thermal conductivity), a comparison between the alternatives is presented based
on the mentioned criteria. Finally, the eco-friendliest construction material
based on the criteria is determined. 

Keywords

Ecological impact, construction materials, environment

References

• [1]. Grace, K. & Ding, C. (2015) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of sustainable building materials: an overview University of Technology Sydney, Australia, 1-20.
• [2]. Guggemos, A. A., & Horvath, A. (2005). Comparison of environmental effects of steel-and concrete-framed buildings. Journal of infrastructure systems, 11(2), 93-101.
• [3]. Esin, T. (2007). A study regarding the environmental impact analysis of the building materials production process (in Turkey). Building and Environment, 42(11), 3860-3871.
• [4]. Bastianoni, S., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., & Pulselli, R. M. (2006). The ecological footprint of building construction. The Sustainable City IV: Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, 345-356.
• [5]. Franzoni, E. (2011). Materials selection for green buildings: which tools for engineers and architects?. Procedia Engineering, 21, 883-890.
• [6]. Bribián, I. Z., Capilla, A. V., & Usón, A. A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), 1133-1140.
• [7]. Thormark, C. (2006). The effect of material choice on the total energy need and recycling potential of a building. Building and Environment, 41(8), 1019-1026.
• [8]. Saghafi, M. D., & Teshnizi, Z. S. H. (2011). Recycling value of building materials in building assessment systems. Energy and Buildings, 43(11), 3181-3188.
• [9]. Cole, R. J., & Rousseau, D. (1992). Environmental auditing for building construction: energy and air pollution indices for building materials. Building and Environment, 27(1), 23-30.
• [10]. Seppälä, J., Koskela, S., Melanen, M., & Palperi, M. (2002). The Finnish metals industry and the environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 35(1-2), 61-76.
• [11]. Nebel, B., Zimmer, B., & Wegener, G. (2006). Life cycle assessment of wood floor coverings-a representative study for the german flooring industry (11 pp). The international journal of life cycle assessment, 11(3), 172-182.
• [12]. Asif, M., Muneer, T., & Kelley, R. (2007). Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Building and environment, 42(3), 1391-1394.
• [13]. Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R. (2006). Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Building and Environment, 41(7), 940-951.
• [14]. Junnila, S., & Horvath, A. (2003). Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 9(4), 157-166.