Adaptation of Positive Mental Health Scale into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Year 2019, , 44 - 54, 10.06.2019

Aynur Yılmaz Akbaba , Jale Eldeleklioğlu

https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.569976

Cited By: 13

Abstract

In this paper, it was aimed to adapt the Positive
Mental Health Scale (PMHS) into Turkish language. In total 360 university
students with ages ranging from 18 to 25, participated in the research. Validity
and reliability analysis were carried out after the linguistic equivalency of
the scale was examined. The psychometric properties of the scale were examined
by internal consistency, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, it comes
in view that the scale has a single factor structure. Related to the PMHS, the
internal consistency coefficient was found .85. In the context of the criterion-related
validity, positive correlations were found between Positive Mental Health Scale
(PMHS) and Oxford Happiness Questionnaire (OHQ), Psychological Well-being Scale
(PWS) and Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). It is concluded that the PMHS is a
valid and reliable instrument to measure positive mental health level of university
students. 

Keywords

Positive Mental Health, Psychological Well-Being, Validity, Reliability

References

• Becker, P. (1989). Der trier persönlichkeitsfragebogen (TPF) handan-weisung [The trier personality inventory (TIP) manual]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
• Büyüköztürk Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygu-lamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(32). View Article: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/108451
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö. & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
• Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Harcourt Brace Jovanovic College Publishers: Philadelphia.
• Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. View Article: http://labs.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/Documents/Diener-Emmons-Larsen Grif-fin_1985.pdf
• Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 34-43. View Article: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., et al. (2009). New measures of well-being. Social Indicators Research Series, 39. View Article: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-90-481-2354-4.pdf
• Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
• Doğan, T. ve Çötok, A. N. (2011). Oxford mutluluk ölçeği kısa formunun Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4, 165– 172. View Article: http://pdrdergisi.org/index.php/pdr/article/view/100/101
• Doğan, T. (2015). Kısa psikolojik sağlamlık ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 93-102. View Article: http://www.journalofhappiness.net/frontend/articles/pdf/v03i01/77.pdf
• Fahrenberg, J., Selg, H., & Hampel, R. (1989). Das Freiburger Persön-lichkeitsinventar: FPI; Handanweisung; revidierte Fassung FPI-R und teilweise geanderte Fassung FPI-A1 [The Freiburg Personality Invento-ry: FPI; Manual; revised version FPI-R and partly adapted version FPI-A1]. Göttingen, Germany: Verlag für Psychologie Hogrefe.
• Grob, A., Lüthi, R., Kaiser, F. G., Flammer, A., Mackinnon, A., & Wearing, A. J. (1991). Berner Fragebogen zum Wohlbefinden Jugendlicher (BFW) [The Bern Subjective Well-Being Ques-tionnaire for Adolescents (BFW)]. Diagnostica, 37, 66–75.
• Hills, P. & Argyle, M. (2002). The oxford happiness questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-of criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conven-tional criteria versus new alternatives. Structure Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
• Hu, Y., Stewart-Brown, S., Twigg, L., & Weich, S. (2007). Can the 12 item General Health Questionnaire be used to measure positive mental health? Psychological Medicine, 37(7), 1005-1013. View Ar-ticle: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707009993
• Kelecioğlu, H. ve Göçer Sahin, S. (2014). Geçmişten günümüze geçerlik. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2).
• Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022. View Article: DOI: http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
• Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207-222.
• Kline, B. R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 335–343. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
• Lukat, J., Margraf, J., Lutz, R., van der Veld, W. M., & Becker, E. S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-scale). BMC Psychology, 4, 8. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0111-x
• Lukat, J., Becker, E. S., Lavallee, K. L., Veld, W. M., and Margraf, J. (2017). Predictors of incidence, remis-sion and relapse of Axis I mental disorders in young women: a transdiagnostic approach. Clin. Psychol. Psychother., 24, 322-331. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2026
• Maercker, A., Zhang, X.C.,Gao, Z., Kochetkov, Y., Lu, S., Sang, Z., Yang, S., Schneider, S., Margraf, J. (2015). Personal value orientations mediated predictors of mental health: A three-culture study of Chinese, Russian, and German university students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15, 8-17. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.06.001
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potential: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. View Article: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
• Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99–104. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-8721.ep10772395
• Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Jennifer Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medi-cine, 15, 194–200. View Article: DOI: 10.1080/10705500802222972
• Tabachnick B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. USA: Pearson Education Company.
• Telef, B. B. (2013). Psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği (PIOO): Türkçe’ye uyarlama: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(3), 374-384. View Article: http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/237-published.pdf
• Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 50-63. View Article: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63
• Tönnies, S., Plöhn, S., & Krippendorf, U. (1996). Skalen zur psychischen Gesundheit (SPG) [Scales for mental health (SPG)]. Heidelberg, Germany: Asanger.
• Vaingankar, J.A., Subramaniam, M., Lim, Y.W., Sherbourne, C., Luo, N., Ryan, G., et al. (2012). From well-being to positive mental health: Conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore. Quality of Life Research, 21:1785-94. View Article: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0105-3.
• Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudai-monia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678-691. View Article: DOI: http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
• World Health Organization (2003). Investing in Mental Health. View Article: http://www.who.int/mental_health/media/investing_mnh.pdf