Sezaryen Sonrası Vajinal Doğumda Balon Kateter Uygulaması: Sistematik Derleme

Year 2022, Volume: 19 Issue: 3, 1468 - 1487, 30.09.2022

Dilek Sinem Uludağ , Nuran Aydın Ateş

https://doi.org/10.38136/jgon.962948

Abstract

Amaç: Sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğumda mekanik dilatasyon amacıyla balon kateter kullanımına yönelik 2011-2021 tarihleri arasında yayınlanmış randomize kontrollü retrospektif ve prospektif deneysel çalışmaları gözden geçirmek ve elde edilen verileri sistematik biçimde incelemektir.
Gereç-Yöntem: Konu ile ilgili ‘’Pubmed’’ veri tabanı kullanılarak 116 çalışmaya ulaşıldı. Çalışmaların tümü gözden geçirilerek dahil edilme kriterlerini karşılayan 10 yayın çalışma kapsamına alındı. Ulaşılan çalışmalar, yöntemleri ve bulguları açısından sistematize edildi.
Bulgular: Çalışmalar incelendiğinde sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğumda mekanik dilatasyon amacıyla yoğunlukla tek balonlu kateter uygulandığı ve sıvı volümünün ortalama 30-50 ml olduğu görülmüştür. Foley balon kateter kullanımı ile ilk 24 saatte servikal Bishop Skoru’nda artış olduğu ve vajinal doğum oranının %57, sezaryen doğum oranının %43 olduğu belirlenmiştir. Servikal olgunlaşma sağlandıktan sonra eylemin devamlılığı için düşük doz oksitosin desteğine ihtiyaç olabileceği belirtilmiştir. Medikal indüksiyona kıyasla artmış maternal ve fetal komplikasyon görülmemektedir.
Sonuç: Sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğum indüksiyonunda foley-balon kateter kullanımı güvenli ve etkili bir yöntemdir. Artış eğiliminde olan sezaryen oranlarını azaltmak için foley-balon kateter kullanımının yaygınlaştırılması konusunda klinisyenler teşvik edilmelidir. Kateter seçimi için serviks mutlaka değerlendirilmelidir.
Anahtar Sözcükler: Sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğum, önceki sezaryen, balon kateter, foley, servikal olgunlaşma.

Keywords

Sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğum, önceki sezaryen, balon kateter, foley, servikal olgunlaşma.

A Systematic Review in Balloon Catheter Application in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

Abstract

Aim: To investigate and review retrospective and prospective randomized controlled trials about balloon catheter application for mechanical dilatation in vaginal birth after caesarian in studies published between 2011-2021 and to systematically examine the data.
Instrument and Methods: Pubmed database was used and 116 randomized controlled trials were reached. All of the studies were examined and 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The studies that were reached were systematised in regards to their methods and findings.
Findings: When the studies were examined, it was seen that a single-balloon catheter was mostly used for mechanical dilation in vaginal delivery after cesarean section and the balloon fluid volume was 30-50 ml on average. It was determined that there was an increase in the cervical Bishop Score in the first 24 hours with the use of foley balloon catheter, and the vaginal delivery rate was 57% and the cesarean delivery rate was 43%. It has been stated that low-dose oxytocin support may be needed for the continuation of the action after cervical ripening was achieved. Compared to medical induction, no increased maternal and fetal complications were reported.
Conclusion: Foley-balloon catheter is a safe and effective method for induction of vaginal birth after cesarean section. Clinicians should be encouraged to expand the use of foley-balloon catheters to reduce the inreasing rate of caesarean delivery. Cervix must be evaluated in the choice of catheter types.
Key words: Vaginal birth after cesarean, previous cesarean, balloon catheter, foley, cervical ripening.

Keywords

Vaginal birth after cesarean, previous cesarean, balloon catheter, foley, cervical ripening.

References

• T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk Sağlığı ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Doğum ve Sezaryen Eylemi Yönetim Rehberi. Ankara: Damla Matbaacılık, Reklamcılık ve Yayıncılık Tic. Ltd. Şti.; 2010. 10 p.
• Karabel PM, Demirbaş M, İnci BM. Türkiye’de ve Dünya’da Değişen Sezaryen Sıklığı ve Olası Nedenleri. Sak Tıp Derg. 2017;7(4):158–63.
• Berkiten Ergin A. Riskli Doğumlar. In: Şirin A, Kavlak O, editors. Kadın Sağlığı. 1. Basım. Bedray Basın Yayıncılık; 2018. p. 681–705.
• Sayın CN, Erzincan GS, Çilingir Uzun I. Sezaryen: Kanıta Dayalı Bilgiler. Türkiye Klin J Gynecol Obs Top. 2018;11(1):76–81.
• Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2019 Haber Bülteni [Internet]. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/39024,haber-bulteni-2019pdf.pdf?0
• Jakhar S, Malla VG. Use of intracervical Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening in women planned for vaginal birth after previous caesarean section. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(12):4927.
• Sananes N, Rodriguez M, Stora C, Pinton A, Fritz G, Gaudineau A, et al. Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous Caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(4):669–76.
• Casella C, Emanuele C, Bianco C, Saccone G, Guida M, Graziano V, et al. No Title. Perinatoloji Derg. 2020;28(3):154–6.
• Bouchghoul H, Zeino S, Houllier M, Senat M V. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(4).
• Yanıkkerem E, Saruhan A. Sezaryen Sonrası Vajinal Doğum: Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar. Hemşirelikte Araştırma Geliştirme Derg. 2007
• Radan AP, Amylidi-Mohr S, Mosimann B, Simillion C, Luigi R, Mueller M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of labour induction after caesarean section using balloon catheter or oxytocin. Swiss Med Wkly. 2017;147.
• Çetinkaya EŞ, Söylemez F. Doğum İndüksiyonunda Bașarıyı Etkileyen Faktörler ve Doğum İndüksiyonu Yöntemleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2013;66(1).
• Rath W, Kehl S. The Renaissance of Transcervical Balloon Catheters for Cervical Ripening and Labour Induction. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015;75(11):1130–9.
• Pez V, Deruelle P, Kyheng M, Boyon C, Clouqueur E, Garabedian C. Méthodes de Maturation Cervicale et Déclenchement du Travail: évaluation de la sonde simple ballonnet comparée à la sonde double ballonnet et aux prostaglandines. Gynécologie Obs Fertil Sénologie. 2018;46(7):570–4.
• Wormer KC, Bauer A, Williford AE. Bishop Score [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470368/.
• Lim SY, Kim YH, Kim CH, Cho MK, Kim JW, Kang WD, et al. The effect of a Foley catheter balloon on cervical ripening. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(8):830–8. Huisman CMA, Jozwiak M, Leeuw JW, Mol BW, Bloemenkamp KWM. Cervical Ripening in The Netherlands: A Survey. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;1–10.
• Smith AJ. Balloon Dilators for Labor Induction: a Historical Review. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2013;6(10). 19. Boujenah J, Fleury C, Tigaizin A, Benbara A, Mounsambote L, Murtada R, et al. Déclenchement par ballonnet en cas d’utérus cicatriciel et col défavorable : la tentative en vaut-elle la chandelle ? Gynécologie Obs Fertil Sénologie. 2019;
• Kaplanoğlu M. Sezaryen Sonrası Vaginal Doğum. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Derg. 2014;23(4):624–36. 21. Karaçam Z. Sistematik Derleme Metodolojisi: Sistematik Derleme Hazırlamak İçin Bir Rehber. DEUHYO ED. 2013;6(1):26–33.
• Huisman CMA, Eikelder MLG, Mast K, Rengerink KO, Jozwiak M, Dunne F, et al. Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):920–8.
• Cheuk QK, Lo TK, Lee CP, Yeung AP. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review. Hong Kong Med J. 2015;21(3):243–50.
• Jozwiak M, van de lest HA, Burger NB, Dijksterhuis MGK, De Leeuw JW. Cervical ripening with Foley catheter for induction of labor after cesarean section: a cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(3):296–301.
• Sharma C, Soni A, Gupta A, Verma A. Mifepristone vs Balloon Catheter for Labor Induction in Previous Cesarean: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(2):241–8.
• Wallstrom T, Bjorklund J, Frykman J, Janbert-Petterson H, Akerud H, Darj E. Induction of labor after one previous Cesarean section in women with an unfavorable cervix: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(7).
• Sarreau M, Iskly H, Poulain P, Fontaine B, Morel O, Villemonteix P. Balloon Catheter Vs Oxytocin Alone For Induction Of Labor in Women With a Previous Cesarean Section: a Randomised Controlled Trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;99(2):259–66.
• Xing Y, Li N, Ji Q, Hong L, Wang X, Xing B. Double-balloon catheter compared with single-balloon catheter for induction of labor with a scarred uterus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;243:139–43.
• Boisen AB, Lokkegaard EC, Fuglsang J. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labor in 362 women with and without prior cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;4.
• De Bonrosto T, Tejero Cabrejas EL, Marti Gamboa S, Lapresta Moros M, Campillos Maza JM, Castan Mateo S. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(5):1135–43.
• Kehl S, Weiss C, Rath W. Balloon catheters for induction of labor at term after previous cesarean section: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:44–50.
• Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1).
• Gonsalyes H, Al-Riyami N, Al-Dughaishi T, Gowri V, Al-Azri M, Salahuddin A. Use of Intracervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Cases of Previous Caesarean Section: Experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016;16(4):445–50.
• Levy R, Kanengiser B, Furman B, Ben Arie A, Brown D, Hagay ZJ. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1632–6.
• Landon MB, Leindecke S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016–23.
• Birara M, Gberehiwot Y. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(31).
• Ryan GA, Nicholson SM, Morrison JJ. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: Current status and where to from here? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:52–7.
• Brill Y, Windrim R. Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada JOGC. 2003;25(4):275–86.
• Dalbye R, Gunnes N, Blix E, Zhang J, Eggebo T, Tokheim NL, et al. Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric, maternal and neonatal outcomes: A cohort study of nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(3):521–30.
• Chen W, Xue J, Peprah M, Wen S, Walker M, Gao Y, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;123(3):346–54.
• Ertem G, Koçer A. Sezaryen Sonrası Vajinal Doğum. Dirim Tıp Derg. 2008;82:1–5.