DELIVER PREFERENCE AND INFLUENCING FACTORS IN WOMEN GIVING BIRTH

Year 2019, Volume: 5 Issue: 9, 95 - 106, 27.10.2019

Handan Özcan , Nezihe Kızılkaya Beji , Rukiye Höbek Akarsu

Abstract

This
study was planned to determine the birth preferences of women with vaginal,
cesarean and both vaginal and cesarean delivery experience. A total of 600
women were sampled. The reasons for choosing vaginal birth of women
participating in our work are to be natural and suitable for baby, less pain
and bleeding in postpartum period, easier return to normal life and earlier
discharge. In our study, the reasons for choosing cesarean birth were
determined as indications and doctor's decision, less pain and more comfort,
baby safety, no perineal tears, short duration of operation and easy
management. 

Keywords

Birth preference, cesarean birth, fear of birth, vaginal birth, pain

References

• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2010). Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. Obstetrics Gynecology, 123, 693-711.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2014). Practice Bulletinno. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics Gynecology, 16(2), 450-63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251.Arcia, A. (2013). US nulliparas’ perceptions of rolesand of the birth experience as predictors of their delivery preferences. Midwifery, 29, 885-94. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.10.002.
• Attanasio, L.B., Kozhimannil, K.B., Kjerulff, K.H. (2018). Women's preference for vaginal birth after a first delivery by cesarean. Birth, Jul 27. doi: 10.1111/birt.12386.
• Barber, E.L., Lundsberg, L.S., Belanger, K., Pettker, C.M., Funai, E.F., & Illuzzi, J.L. (2011). Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstetrics Gynecology, 118, 29-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65.
• Chen, M.M. & Hancock, H. (2012). Women’s knowledge of options for birth after Caesarean Section. Women and Birth, 25, 19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.08.001.
• Domingues, R.M.S., Dias, M.A.B., Nakamura-Pereira, M., Torres, M.A., d’Orsi, E., Pereira, A.P…Leal, C. (2014). Process of decision making regarding the mode of birth in Brazil: from the initial preference of women to the final mode of birth. Cad Saude Publica, 30, 1-16.
• Fuglenes, D., Aas, E., Botten, G., Oian, P. (2012). Kristiansen IS. Maternal preference for cesarean delivery: do women get what they want? Obstetrics Gynecology, 120, 252-60. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182605b1a.
• Gözükara, F., Eroğlu, K. (2008). The factors that affect the preferences of women who delivered their first birth (primiparous). Faculty of Health Sciences Nursing Journal, 15(1), 32-46. [Original work published in Turkish].
• Hamilton, B., Hoyert, D., Martin, J., Strobino, D., & Guyer, B. (2013). Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-11. Pediatrics, 131(3), 548-58. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3769.
• Heinzmann, A., Brugger, M., Engels, C., Prompeler, H., Superti-Furga, A., Struch, K., & Krueger, M. (2009). Risk factors of neonatal respiratory distress following vaginal delivery and caesarean section in the German population. Acta Paediatrica, 98(1), 25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01150.x.
• Kaimal, A.J. & Kuppermann, M. (2012). Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patient and provider preferences. Seminars in Perinatology, 36, 384-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.024
• Karlstrom, A., Nystedt, A., Johansson, M., Hildingsson, I. (2010). Behind the my the few women preferces are an section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors. Midwifery, 27, 620-7.
• Kingdon, C., Neilson, J., Singleton, V., Gyte, G., Hart, A., Gabbay, M., Lavender, T. (2009). Choice and birth method: mixed-method study of caesarean delivery for maternal request. An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116, 886-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02119.x.
• Klein, M. (2005). Obstetrician’s fear of childbirth: How did it happen? Birth, 32(3), 207-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00371.x
• Kocak, D.Y., Ozcan, H. (2018). Postnatal maternal attachment: a retrospective study. Perinatal Journal, 26(2), 78-86. doi: 10.2399/prn.18.0262005.
• Kringeland, T., Daltveit, A.K., Moller, A. (2010). How does preference for natural child birth relate to actual mode of delivery? A population based cohort study from Norway. Birth, 37, 21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00374.x.
• MacDorman, M., Declercq, E., Menacker, F., Malloy, M. (2008). Neonatal mortality for primary caesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an intention-to-treat model. Birth, 35(1), 3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x.
• Moffat, M., Bell, J., Porter, M., Lawton, S., Hundley, V., Danielian, P., Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. An International Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology, 114, 86-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01154.x
• Nakamura-Pereira, M., Esteves-Pereira, A.P., Gama, S.G.N., Leal, M. (2018). Elective repeat cesarean delivery in women eligible for trial of labor in Brazil. International Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics, 143(3), 351-359. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12660.
• National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (2011). Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13620/57162/57162.pdf (Access: 19.10.2017).
• National Institutes of Health-NIH (2006). State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request. NIH Consens Science Statements, 23, 1-29.Ozcan, H., Arar, I, Cakır, A. (2018). Fathers and Pregnancy Process. Zeynep Kamil Medical Bulletin, 49(1), 72-76. doi: 10.16948/zktipb.334583
• Ozkana, S., Sakal, F.N., Avcı, E., Civil, E.F., Tunca, M.Z. (2013). Turkish women's method of birth and related factors. Journal of Public Health, 11(2), 59-71. [Original work published in Turkish].
• Pang, M.W., Leung, T.N., Lau, T.K., Chung, T.K. (2008). Impact of firstchildbirth on changes in women’s preference for mode of delivery: followup of a longitudinal observational study. Birth, 35(2), 121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x.
• Rossi, A. & D’addario, V. (2008). Maternal morbidity following a trial of labour after caesarean section vs. elective repeat caesarean delivery: a systematic review with meta analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology, 199(3), 224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.025.
• Shorten, A. & Shorten, B. (2014). Timing the provision of a pregnancy decision-aid: Temporal patterns of preference for mode of birth during pregnancy. Patient Education and Counseling, 97, 108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.011.
• Shorten, A., Shorten, B., Keogh, J., West, S., Morris, J. (2005). Making choices for child birth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid fori nformed birth after cesarean. Birth, 32, 253-62. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00383.x
• Takegata, M., Haruna, M., Morikawa, M., Yonezawa, K., Komada, M., Severinsson, E. (2018). Qualitative exploration of fear of childbirth and preferences for mode of birth among Japanese primiparas. Nursing Health Sciences, 20(3), 338-345. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12571.
• Turkey Demographic and Health Survey (Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması) TNSA (2014), T. C. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Ankara, Türkiye, 2013.
• Turner, C.E., Young, J.M., Solomon, M.J., Ludlow, J., Benness, C., Phipps, H. (2008). Vaginal delivery compared with elective caesarean section: the views of pregnant women and clinicians. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics Gynaecology, 115(12), 1494-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01892.x.
• United States Department of Healt Hand Human Services. Healthy People 2020: Maternal, Infantand Child Health. Washington, DC, 2013. Access:10.09.2017.
• Wu, E., Kaimal, A., Houston, K., Yee, L.M., Nakagawa, S., Kuppermann, M. (2014). Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, 210(5), 440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.11.021
• Yee, L., Simon, M. (2010). The role of the social network in contraceptive decision making among young, African American and Latin a woman. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47, 374-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.014.
• Yee, L.M., Kaimal, A.J., Houston, A.K., Wu, E., Thiet, M., Nakagawa, S., … Kupperman, M. (2015). Mode of delivery preferences in a diverse population of pregnant women. American Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology, 212; 377, 1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.029