Non-linear analysis of composite parts jointed with embedded adhesive under tensile load

Year 2020, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 465 - 476, 01.03.2020

İsmail Yasin Sülü

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.630769

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, the composite parts subjected to tensile load were combined with a double-acting adhesive connection and analyzed using the 3D finite element method (FEM). The joint design is important to ensure that the joint is durable, does not take up too much space and has a long service life. In the analysis, carbon / epoxy (AS4 / 3501-6) composite parts with different orientation angles were used and DP410 was used as adhesive. Models for numerical analysis were created using ANSYS 14.5 package program. Finite element analyzes were performed to determine the damage loads. In general, because the damages occur in the adhesive region, the stresses in all directions on the adhesive, shear stresses, von-Mises stress and peel stresses were obtained at the specified failure loads. As a result, the effects of orientation angles, overlap dimensions of the bonded area and adhesive layer were investigated. The most effective parameters were determined for the composite parts joined with embedded double-acting adhesive. Furthermore, it is stated that embedded adhesive connection is important for industrial applications.

Keywords

Non-linear analysis, finite element method (FEM), joint design, analysis, laminated composite

References

• Abdi H, Papadopoulos J, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A, 2017. Enhanced elastic-foundation analysis of balanced single lap adhesive joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 72: 80–91.
• Stein N, Mardani H, Becker W, 2016. An efficient analysis model for functionally graded adhesive single lap joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 70: 117–125.
• Guin W E, Wang J, 2016. Theoretical model of adhesively bonded single lap joints with functionally graded adherents. Engineering Structures, 124: 316–332.
• Ribeiro T E A, Campilho R D S G, da Silva L FM, Goglio L, 2016. Damage analysis of composite–aluminium adhesively-bonded single-lap joints. Composite Structures, 136: 25–33.
• Sülü İsmail Yasin, Şahinaslan Apdulmutalip, 2016. Experimental failure testing and repair of internal pressurized composite pipes using different fracture models. Materials Testing, 58- 9: 788-793.
• Sülü İsmail Yasin, 2017. Mechanical behavior of internal pressurized composite pipes jointed with embedded tubular sleeves. Materials Testing,59-3: 272-277.
• Tang J H, Sridhar I, Srikanth N, 2013. Static and fatigue failure analysis of adhesively bonded thick composite single lap joints. Composites Science and Technology, 86: 18–25.
• Kim K S, Yi Y M, Cho G R, Kim C G, 2008. Failure prediction and strength improvement of uni-directional composite single lap bonded joints. Composite Structures, 82: 513–520.
• Katnam K B, Comer A J, Stanley W F, Buggy M, Ellingboe A R, Young T M, 2011.Characterisingprepreg and non-crimp-fabric composite single lap bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 31: 679–686.
• Khalili S M R, Jafarkarimi M H, Abdollahi M A, 2009. Creep analysis of fibre reinforced adhesives in single lap joints—Experimental study. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 29: 656–661.
• Ariaee S, Tutunchi A, Kianvash A, Entezami A A, 2014. Modeling and optimization of mechanical behavior of bonded composite–steel single lap joints by response surface methodology. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 54: 30–39.
• Reis P N B, Antunes F J V, Ferreira J A M, 2005. Influence of superposition length on mechanical resistance of single-lap adhesive joints. Composite Structures, 67: 125–133.
• Fawzia Sabrina, Al-Mahaidi Riadh , Zhao Xiao-Ling, 2006. Experimental and finite element analysis of a double strap joint between steel plates and normal modulus CFRP. Composite Structures, 75: 156–162.
• Fawzia Sabrina, Zhao Xiao-Ling, Al-Mahaidi Riadh, 2010. Bond–slip models for double strap joints strengthened by CFRP. Composite Structures, 92: 2137–2145.
• Nguyen Tien-Cuong, Bai Yu, Zhao Xiao-Ling, Al-Mahaidi Riadh, 2011. Mechanical characterization of steel/CFRP double strap joints at elevated temperatures. Composite Structures, 93: 1604–1612.
• Akpinar Salih, 2013. Effects of laminate carbon/epoxy composite patches on the strength of double-strap adhesive joints: Experimental and numerical analysis. Materials and Design, 51: 501–512.
• Lee H K, Pyo S H, Kim B R, 2009. On joint strengths, peel stresses and failure modes in adhesively bonded double-strap and supported single-lap GFRP joints. Composite Structures, 87: 44–54.
• Adin Hamit, Turgut Aydın , 2013. The Effects of Width on the Strength of Adhesively Bonded Z Joints Subjected to Tensile Loads. The Journal of Adhesion, 89:1–18.
• Adin Hamit, Temiz Şemsettin, 2014. Experimental and Numerical Strength Analysis of Double Lap Joints Subjected to Tensile Loads. Materials Testing, 56- 2: 160-168.
• Temiz Semsettin, Sülü Ismail Yasin, Adin Hamit, 2015. Behaviour Of Bi-Adhesive in Double-Strap Joint With Embedded Patch Subjected to Bending. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 45-3: 83–96
• Adin Hamit, 2017. Effect of overlap length and scarf angle on the mechanical properties of different adhesive joints subjected to tensile loads. Materials Testing, 59-6: 536-546.
• Adin Hamit, 2012. The effect of angle on the strain of scarf lap joints subjected to tensile loads. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 36-7: 2858-2867.
• Salih A, Aydin M D, 2014. 3-D non-linear stress analysis on the adhesively bonded composite joint under bending moment. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 81: 149–157.
• Daniel I M, Abot J L, 2000. Fabrication testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Composites Science and Technology, 60: 2455–2463.
• Camponeschi E T, 1990. Compression Response of Thick-Section Composite Materials. ReportDTRC-SME-90/60, David Taylor Research Center, Annapolis, USA.
• Sülü İ Y, Temiz Ş, Aydin M D, 2015. Layer effects of multi-layered face to face adhesively bonded composite pipes subjected to internal pressure.Academic Journal of Science, 04: No. 3, 195–202.
• Sulu Ismail Yasin, Temiz Semsettin, 2018. Failure and stress analysis of internal pressurized composite pipes joined with sleeves. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 32:8, 816-832.
• Ozel A, YaziciB, AkpinarS, Aydin M D, Temiz Ş, 2014. A study on the strength of adhesively bonded joints with different adherends. Composites Part B: Engineering, 62: 167 – 174.
• Sülü İsmail Yasin, 2017. Mechanical behavior of internal pressurized composite pipes jointed with embedded tubular sleeves. Materials Testing, 59-3: pages 272-277.
• Sülü İsmail Yasin, 2016. Stress Analysis of Multi-Layered Hybrid Composite Pipes Subjected to Internal Pressure. International Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences, Vol.8- Issue 4: 87-98.
• Temiz S, 2006.Application of bi-adhesive in double-strap joints subjected to bending moment. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 20: 1547–1560.