DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE MİKROSIZINTI VE MİKROSIZINTI ARAŞTIRMA YÖNTEMLERİ

Year 2011, Volume: 45 Issue: 1, 25 - 35, 24.07.2011

Uğur Erdemir , Batu Yaman

Abstract

Dişhekimliğinde mikrosızıntı, birçok faktörün etki ettiği biyolojik bir olay zinciridir. Restorasyonların kalıcılığını etkileyen,
renkleşmelere yol açan, post operatif duyarlılık ve sekonder çürük oluşumlarına neden olan mikrosızıntının önlenebilmesi
için literatürde çok sayıda araştırma, test yöntemi ve bunların güvenilirlikleri ve geçerlilikleri ile ilgili birçok veri
bulunmaktadır. Yapılan araştırmalarda, gerek restoratif materyallerin yapısal özellikleri, gerekse uygulama yöntemleri
geliştirilerek diş dokuları ile daha iyi bir uyum sağlanmasına ve mikrosızıntının önlenmesine çalışılmaktadır. Kenar
sızıntısının değerlendirilmesi için birçok test metodu geliştirilmiş ve denenmiştir. Bu test metodları içinde; boyar madde
penetrasyon testleri, radyoizotoplar, kimyasal ajanlar, bakteriyel testler, hava basıncı yöntemi, nötron aktivasyon analizi,
elektrokimyasal yöntemler ve mikroskobik inceleme yöntemleri gibi test metodları bulunmaktadır. Bu makalede kenar
sızıntısının değerlendirilmesinde kullanılan bu test metodları ve bunların olumlu ve olumsuz yönleri hakkında bilgiler
derlenmiştir

Keywords

Mikrosızıntı, test metodları

References

• Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent, 1992; 20: 3-10. 2.
• Kidd EA. Microleakage in relation to amalgam and composite restorations. A laboratory study. Br Dent J, 1976; 16: 305-310. 3.
• Gwinnett JA, Tay FR, Pang KM, Wei SH. Comparison of three methods of critical evaluation of microleakage along restorative interfaces. J Prosthet Dent, 1995; 74: 575-585. 4.
• Ferrari M, Mason PN, Fabianelli A, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations. Am J Dent, 1999; 12: 134-142. 5.
• Déjou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater, 1996; 12: 342-349. 6.
• Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA.
• restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol, 1982; 11: 439-450. dental 7.
• Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc, 1972; 84: 1349-1357. 8.
• Grossman ES, Matejka JM. In vitro marginal leakage in varnished and lined amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent, 1993; 69: 469- 474. 9.
• Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Endodontic leakage studies reconsidered. Part I. Methodology, application and relevance. Int Endod J, 1993; 26: 37-43.
• Dauvillier BS, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res, 2000; 79: 818-823.
• Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater, 1999; 15: 128-37. 12. Retief DH. Do adhesives
• prevent microleakage? Int Dent J, 1994; 44: 19-26.
• Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects. Oper Dent, 2000; 25: 121-129.
• Muniz M, Quioca J, Dolci GS, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation. Oper Dent, 2005; 30: 228-233.
• Jedrychowski JR, Bleier RG, Caputo AA. Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filling techniques in conservative Class II restorations. ASDC J Dent Child, 2001; 68: 161-167.
• Yap AU, Ng SC, Siow KS. Soft-start polymerization: influence on effectiveness of cure and post-gel shrinkage. Oper Dent, 2001; 26: 260-266.
• Yap AU, Seneviratne C. Influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent, 2001; 26: 460-466.
• Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res, 1990; 69: 913-914.
• Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res, 1996; 75: 871-878.
• Dayangaç B. Kompozit rezin restorasyonlar. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi, 2000, 85-91.
• Watts DC, Marouf AS. Optimal specimen geometry in bonded-disk shrinkage-strain measurements on light-cured biomaterials. Dent Mater, 2000; 16: 447-451.
• Unterbrink GL, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin literature
• recommendations. Quintessence Int, 1999; 30: 249-257. "filled and review
• clinical 23. Lovell LG, Newman SM, Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity, temperature, and comonomer
• polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res, 1999; 78: 1469- 1476. on the polymerization shrinkage
• of 31. Elledge DA. Multifunctional bases and liners. Dent Clin North Am, 1998; 42: 739-754.
• Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent, 1997; 25: 435-440.
• Estafan AM, Estafan D. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2000; 21: 705-712. 34. Estafan D, Agosta C.
• Eliminating microleakage from the composite resin system. Gen Dent, 2003; 51: 506-509.
• Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL. Stress transfer from polymerization shrinkage of a chemical- cured composite bonded to a pre-cast composite substrate. Dent Mater, 1998; 14: 106-111.
• Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". Oper Dent, 2000; 25: 26-32.
• Leinfelder KF. Is it possible to control the directional
• composites? J Am Dent Assoc, 2001; 132: 782-783. of
• resin-based 38. Applequist EA, Meiers JC. Effect of bulk insertion, prepolymerized resin composite balls, and beta-quartz inserts on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int, 1996; 27: 253-258.
• Aw TC, Nicholls JI. Polymerization shrinkage of densely-filled resin composites. Oper Dent, 2001; 26: 498-504.
• Noort RV. Introduction to dental materials. Mosby, London; 1994: p.89-105.
• O'Brien WJ. Dental Materials and their selection. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc., 1997.
• Sideridou I, Achilias DS, Kyrikou E. Thermal expansion characteristics of light-cured dental resins and resin composites. Biomaterials, 2004; 25: 3087-3097. 43. Sidhu SK, Carrick mediated coefficient of Temperature
• dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials. Dent Mater, 2004; 20: 435-440.
• Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Wang Y, Viswanadhan
• characterization of visible light cure dental composites. J Oral Rehabil, 1992; 19: 49-64.
• Peterson EA, Phillips RW, Swartz ML. A comparison of the physical properties of four restorative resins. J Am Dent Assoc, 1966; 73: 1324-1336.
• Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater, 1992; 8: 181-184.
• Wahab FK, Shaini FJ, Morgano SM. The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite Class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent, 2003; 90: 168-174.
• Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Overhang of Class V composite resin restorations from hygroscopic expansion. Quintessence Int, 1989; 20: 551-553.
• Thonemann BM, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Hiller KA. SEM analysis of marginal expansion and gap formation in Class II composite restorations. Dent Mater, 1997; 13: 192-197.
• Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent, 1999; 12: 295-298.
• Fabre HS, Fabre S, Cefaly DF, de Oliveira Carrilho MR, Garcia FC, Wang L. Water sorption and solubility of dentin bonding agents light-cured with different light sources. J Dent, 2007; 35: 253-258.
• Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu CK, Carrilho MR. Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins. Dent Mater, 2006; 22: 973-980.
• Boston DW, Kerzie M. An improved technique for Class V composite resin inlays. Quintessence Int, 1993; 24: 19-24.
• Duquia Rde C, Osinaga PW, Demarco FF, de V Habekost L, Conceição EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent, 2006; 31: 682-687.
• Soares CJ, Celiberto L, Dechichi P, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Marginal integrity and microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays: SEM and stereomicroscopic evaluation. Braz Oral Res, 2005; 19: 295-301.
• Isidor F, Brİndum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent, 1995; 74: 140-144.
• Lange RT, Pfeiffer P. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Oper Dent, 2009; 34: 263-272.
• McLaughlin G. Porcelain veneers. Dent Clin North Am, 1998; 42: 653-656.
• Jun SK, McConnell S. Enhancing natural aesthetics via porcelain laminate veneers. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent, 2007; 19: 369-371.
• Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 2008; 139 Suppl:8S-13S.
• Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study. J Dent, 1994; 22: 147-153.
• Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. Dent Mater, 1989; 5: 388-391.
• Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater, 2008; 24: 185- 191.
• Burke FJ, McCaughey AD. Resin luting materials: the current status. Dent Update, 1993; 20: 109-115.
• Uctasli S, Hasanreisoglu U, Wilson HJ. The attenuation of radiation by porcelain and its effect on polymerization of resin cements. J Oral Rehabil, 1994; 21: 565-575.
• el-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, el-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent, 1999; 24: 38-44.
• Gwinnett AJ, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, Ritter amalgam:
• Quintessence Int, 1994; 25: 687-695. the guidelines for
• clinician. 68. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 112-119.
• Pashley EL, Comer RW, Parry EE, Pashley DH. Amalgam buildups: shear strength and dentin sealing properties. Oper Dent, 1991; 16: 82-89. 70. Johnson GH, Gordon sensitivity associated with Postoperative
• posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Oper Dent, 1988; 13: 66-73.
• Burke FJ, McHugh S, Hall AC, Randall RC, Widstrom E, Forss H. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001. Br Dent J, 2003; 194: 613-618.
• Fuks AB. The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent, 2002; 24: 448-455.
• Lacy AM, Staninec M. The bonded amalgam restoration. Quintessence Int, 1989; 20: 512- 514.
• Browning WD, Johnson WW, Gregory PN. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months. J Am Dent Assoc, 2000; 131: 607-611.
• Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dent Mater, 2007; 23: 2-8.
• Ben-Amar A. Reduction of microleakage around new amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc, 1989; 119: 725-728.
• Powell GL, Daines DT. Solubility of cavity varnish: a study in vitro. Oper Dent, 1987; 12: 48-52.
• Büyükgökçesu S. “Dispersalloy” amalgamların kavite duvarı ile olan ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1980.
• Büyükgökçesu S. Dişhekimliğinde amalgam. İstanbul Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi, Ders notu. İstanbul, 1994.
• Harris RK. Dental amalgam: success or failure? Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 243-252.
• Karamürsel-Ulukapi I, Lussi A, Stich H, Hotz P. Comparison of the sealing ability of four cavity varnishes: an in vitro study. Dent Mater, 1991; 7: 84-87.
• Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Jşnior S, Ritter AV. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Quintessence Int, 1998; 29: 637-642.
• Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Amalgam shear bond strength to dentin using single- bottle primer/adhesive systems. Am J Dent, 1999; 12: 222-226.
• Meiers JC, Turner EW. Microleakage of dentin/amalgam alloy bonding agents: results after 1 year. Oper Dent, 1998; 23: 30-35.
• Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J, 2004; 15: 13- 18.
• Mueninghoff LA, Dunn SK, Leinfelder KF. Comparison of dye and ion microleakage tests. Am J Dent, 1990; 3: 192-194.
• Erdilek D, Dörter C, Koray F, Kunzelmann KH, Efes BG, Gomec Y. Effect of Thermo- mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage in Class II Ormocer Restorations. Eur J Dent, 2009; 3: 200-205.
• Heintze SD. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent, 2007; 9 Suppl 1: 77-106.
• Holan G, Chosack A, Casamassimo PS, Eidelman E. Marginal leakage of impregnated Class 2 composites in primary molars: an in vivo study. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 122-128.
• Sparks JD, Hilton TJ, Davis RD, Reagan SE. The influence of matrix use on microleakage in Class 5 glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent, 1992; 17: 192-195.
• Piva E, Meinhardt L, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage. Clin Oral Investig, 2002; 6: 244-248.
• Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Reis A, Grande RH. In vitro microleakage of packable composites
• Quintessence Int, 2004; 35: 29-34. II
• restorations. 93. Williams PT, Schramke D, Stockton L. Comparison of two methods of measuring dye penetration
• studies. Oper Dent, 2002; 27: 628-635.
• microleakage 94. Heinrich R, Kunzel W. Diagnosis and treatment of carious dentine. J Int Assoc Dent Child, 1986; 17: 5-8.
• Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc, 1989; 3: 147-158.
• Chan KC, Swift EJ Jr. Leakage of chemical and light-cured basing materials. J Prosthet Dent, 1989; 62: 408-411.
• Charlton DG, Moore BK. In vitro evaluation of two microleakage detection tests. J Dent, 1992; 20: 55–58.
• Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent, 1997; 22: 173-185.
• Shortall AC. Microleakage, marginal adapta- tion and composite resin restorations. Br Dent J, 1982; 153: 223-227.
• Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Shortall AC, Wilson AD. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of composites. Part I: Radiochemical diffusion technique. J Prosthet Dent, 1988; 60: 304-307. 101. Crim GA, Swartz ML, Phillips
• RW. Comparison of four thermocycling techniques. J Prosthet Dent, 1985; 53: 50-53.
• Tangsgoolwatana J, Cochran MA, Moore BK, Li Y. Microleakage evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations: confocal microscopy versus radioisotope. Quintessence Int, 1997; 28: 467-477.
• Lacy AM, Wada C, Du W, Watanabe L. In vitro microleakage at the gingival margin of porcelain and resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67: 7-10. 104. Tiritoglu
• M. Kenar sızıntısı belirleme yöntemleri. Ege Universitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 1994; 15: 132-138.
• Zivković S, Bojović S, Pavlica D. Bacterial penetration of restored cavities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001; 91: 353-358.
• Pickard HM, Gayford JJ. Leakage at the margins of amalgam restorations. Br Dent J, 1965; 119: 69-77.
• Taylor MJ, Lynch E. Marginal adaptation. J Dent, 1993; 21: 265-273.
• Pameijer CH. Replication techniques with new dental impression materials in combination with different negative impression materials. Scan Electron Microsc, 1979; 2: 571-574.
• Pioch T, Stotz S, Staehle HJ, Duschner H. Applications of confocal laser scanning microscopy to dental bonding. Adv Dent Res, 1997; 11: 453-461.
• Watson TF. Applications of high-speed confocal imaging techniques in operative dentistry. Scanning, 1994; 16: 168-173.
• Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Duschner H, García- Godoy F. Nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface: a review. Am J Dent, 2001; 14: 252- 258.