A descriptive study on in-service English language teachers’ perceptions of the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) in Turkish setting

Year 2018, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 56 - 76, 15.09.2018

Ahmet Önal Nuray Alagözlü

Abstract

Please fill up the following information accurately. (Please use Times New Roman, 12 pt.
A descriptive study on in-service English language teachers’ perceptions of the European portfolio for student teachers of languages (EPOSTL) in Turkish setting
This article aims to arrive at an understanding of in-service language teachers’ perceptions of the EPOSTL self-assessment descriptors in relation to Turkish Foreign Language Education context. More specifically, the researcher aims to reveal the categories of the EPOSTL self-assessment descriptors that have been regarded more important by in-service English language teachers who work for primary, secondary and tertiary level institutions as well as reviewing the suitability and applicability of the EPOSTL self-assessment descriptors for the Turkish context. Adopting a quantitative and quasi-qualitative research design, this study utilized the 195 self-assessment descriptors of the EPOSTL as the items of the questionnaire in the form of a ‘5 point Likert-type scale’ and an open-ended question has been added as the 196th item to collect qualitative data. The means of the in-service English language teachers’ answers have been computed for the whole document and for the categories of the self-assessment descriptors via descriptive statistics involving mean and frequency analyses. As a second step, the distribution of the data has been analyzed via ‘Kolmogorov-Smirnov Goodness-of-Fit Test’. As the distribution of the data is not normal, a non-parametric test, rather than a parametric test, has been employed in order to find out the level of differences between and among the groups of in-service English language teachers. Additionally, ‘Kruskal-Wallis H Test’ has been conducted and ‘pairwise comparisons’ have been performed as a last step in order to reveal the self-assessment descriptors of the EPOSTL that have been attached meaningfully different importance by in-service English language teachers working for different levels of institutions. The findings of this study indicate that the self-assessment descriptors of the EPOSTL have largely been welcomed by in-service language teachers in Turkish context.
Information about Author(s)*
Author 1
Author (Last name, First name)	Önal, Ahmet
Affiliated institution (University)	Suleyman Demirel University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	English Language Teaching
Corresponding author (Yes/No) Write only one corresponding author.	Yes
Author 2
Author (Last name, First name)	Alagözlü, Nuray
Affiliated institution (University)	Hacettepe University
Country	Turkey
Email address	[e-mail]
Department & Rank	English Language Teaching
Corresponding author (Yes/No)	No
Author 3
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)
Author 4
Author (Last name, First name)
Affiliated institution (University)
Country
Email address
Department & Rank
Corresponding author (Yes/No)

Keywords

EPOSTL

References

• Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards Intercultural Communicative Competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.
• Bergil, A. S. & Sarıçoban, A. (2016). Milestone in English Language Teacher Education: How to Use European Profiling Grid in the Assessment of Prospective EFL Teachers' Qualifications. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 206-220.
• Broeder, P. & Wijk, C. (2012). Diversity and education in languages: the European situation. In Broeder, P. & Hisamura, K. (Editors.), Language and education in Japan and Europe, 16-19. Proceedings of the 2012 Japan - Netherlands Education Research Seminar. Tilburg University.
• Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
• Burkert, A. & Schwienhorst, K. (2008). Focus on the Student Teacher: The European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL) as a Tool to Develop Teacher Autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 238-252.
• Büyükgöze, H. (2015). A comparison of the employment of public sector teachers in EU and Turkey. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 57-65.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2010). Preparing Teachers for the Challenges of Diversity, (pp. 4-26). The 22nd JUSTEC Conference 2010 in Tokyo Proceedings. Japan-United States Teacher Education Consortium.
• Çakır, A. & Balçıkanlı, C. (2012). The use of the EPOSTL to foster teacher autonomy: ELT student teachers’ and teacher trainers’ views. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 1-16. Article 2. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol37/iss3/2.
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: OUP.
• Graves, K. (2009). The Curriculum of Second Language Teacher Education. In Burns, A. & Richards, J. C. (Eds.), Second Language Teacher Education, (pp. 115-124). Cambridge University Press.
• Heyworth, F. (2013). How an ECML Publication can Make a Difference – Case Study on the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. 22nd Meeting of the Governing Board, Graz.
• Hişmanoğlu, M. (2013). Does English language teacher education curriculum promote CEFR awareness of prospective EFL teachers? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 938-945.
• Hişmanoğlu, S. (2012). Prospective EFL Teachers’ Views on English Language Teacher Training Program. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 330-341.
• Ingvarsdóttir, H. (2011). The EPOSTL in Iceland: getting the mentors on board. In Newby, D., Fenner, A. B. & Jones, B. (Eds.), Using the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages, (pp. 63-70). Council of Europe Publishing.
• Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. OUP.
• Jimbo, H., Hisamura, K. & Yoffe, L. (2010). Developing English Teacher Competencies: An Integrated Study of Pre-service Training, Professional Development, Teacher Evaluation, and Certification Systems. The English edition of the grant-in-aid for scientific research report. JACET SIG on English Education.
• Kelly, M. & Grenfell, M. (2004). European Profile for Language Teacher Education: A Frame of Reference. University of Southampton. Retrieved on 14/10/2014 from www.lang.soton.ac.uk/profile/index/html.
• Küçüksüleymanoğlu, R. (2006). In Service Training of ELT Teachers in Turkey Between 1998-2005. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 359-369.
• Mirici, İ. H. (2015). European policy and practices in training foreign language teachers. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(4), 42-51.
• Mirici, İ. H. & Demirbaş, S. (2013). How to Turn the EPOSTL into an Electronic Setting: The E-EPOSTL. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1368-1377.
• Mirici, İ. H. & Hergüner, S. (2015). A digital European self-assessment tool for student teachers of foreign languages: The EPOSTL. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 1-10.
• Newby, D. (2007). The European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. Babylonia, 3, 23-26.
• Newby, D. (2011). Contextualization of the CEFR and other Council of Europe instruments within a European context. In Jimbo, H., Hisamura, K., Usui, Y., Oda, M. & Yoffe, L. (Eds.), A Comprehensive Study on the Framework of English Language Teachers’ Professional Development in Japan, (pp. 72-87). Research Project, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (22320112). JACET SIG on English Education.
• Newby, D. (2012a). The European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages: Background and Issues. In Newby, D. (Ed.), Insights into the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL), (pp. 9-28). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Newby, D. (2012b). Supporting good practice in teacher education through the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 207-218. DOI: 10.1080/17501229.2012.725250.
• Newby, D., Allan, R., Fenner, A.-B., Jones, B., Komorowska, H. & Soghikyan, K. (2007). European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. A Reflection Tool for Language Teacher Education. Strasbourg/Graz: Council of Europe Publishing, http://epostl2.ecml.at.
• Newby, D., Fenner, A. B. & Jones, B. (Editors). (2011). Using the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. Council of Europe Publishing.
• Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.
• Okumuş, K. & Akalın, S. (2015). Incorporating EPOSTL (European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages) into methodology course. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications (IJONTE), 6(1), 76-83.
• Sarıçoban, A. (2001). The Teaching of Language Skills. Ankara: Hacettepe-Taş Publishing.
• Su Bergil, A. (2015). A complementary study on European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages in relation to the European Profiling Grid. (PhD Dissertation). Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
• Şahin, Y. (2006). Yabancı Dil Öğretmenlerinin Eğitbilimsel ve Alan Bilgisi Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. (Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Velikova, S. (2013). Using the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages (EPOSTL) to Scaffold Reflective Teacher Learning in English Language Teacher Education. In Edge, J. & Mann, S. (Eds.). Innovations in Pre-Service Education and Training for English Language Teachers, (pp. 201-216). London: British Council.