How to Raise Awareness in Society on The Importance of Gifted Students?

Year 2017, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 1 - 6, 29.12.2017

Eda Demirhan , Şule Elmalı , Şenol Beşoluk

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal views of the prospective teachers of individuals with intellectual disability students on how to raise awareness in society on the importance of gifted children to shape our future. The research has been carried out in the pattern of phenomenological method, a type of qualitative research. The participants of the research are consisted of 78 (46 female and 32 male) senior prospective teachers in the department of education of the mentally disabled program in 2015-2016 academic year. In accordance with the aim, participants have been chosen among those who had selected the “education of gifted students” course also they were senior prospective teachers. The results of the research have been obtained by an open-ended question: What can be done in our society to raise awareness on the importance of gifted students to shape our future? The answers of participants have been analyzed by using content analysis method. According to the results of the analysis, the answers of prospective teachers have been combined in eight subjects as a) Social media, b) Politicians, c) Teachers, d) Families, e) Universities, f) Municipalities, g) Artists and h)Other. Also, we can conclude that participants’ views on raising awareness on the importance of gifted children in the society are similar to practices performed to raise awareness on individuals with intellectual disability.

Keywords

gifted, society, views, prospective teachers

How to Raise Awareness in Society on The Importance of Gifted Students?

Abstract

The aim
of this study is to reveal opinions of the prospective teachers of mentally handicapped
students on how to raise awareness in society on the importance of gifted
children to shape our future. The research has been carried out in the pattern
of phenomenological method, a type of qualitative research. The participants of
the research are consisted of 78 students in total, 46 female and 32 male, who
had been studying in the final year of the department of intellectually
handicapped teaching in 2015-2016 academic year.  In accordance with the aim, participants have
been chosen among those who had selected the “education of gifted students” course
besides being senior prospective teachers. The results of the research have
been obtained by an open-ended question: What can be done in our society to
raise awareness on the importance of gifted students to shape our future? The
answers of participants have been analyzed by using content analysis method.
According to the results of the analysis, the answers of prospective teachers
have been combined in eight subjects as a) Social media, b) Politicians, c)
Teachers, d) Families, e) Universities, f) Municipalities, g) Artists and
h)Other. Mainly we can conclude that participants’ opinions on raising
awareness on the importance of gifted children in the society are similar to
practices performed to raise awareness on mentally handicapped individuals.

Keywords

Gifted, society, opinion

References

• Alav, O. (2014). Sosyal medya’nın birey ve toplumsal yapıya etkileri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 1-22.
• Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. O. (2017). Education of Gifted and Talented Individuals in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Turkey: An Investigation of Education Policies and Its Implementations. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2017.
• Birdişli, F. & Özdemir, H. (2009). The giftedness in qualified public education policy of Turkey and practices at European Union.
• http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30567802/Giftedness_in_Qualified_Public_Education_Policy_of_Turkey_and_Practices_at_Europen_Union.pdf revealed 28.10.2016.
• Clark, B. (2015). Üstün zekâlı olarak büyümek evde ve okulda çocukların potansiyellerini geliştirmek (F. Kaya ve Ü. Ogurlu Çev.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1992). State policies for identification of nontraditional gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 15, 15–17.
• Croft, L. J. (2003). Teachers of the gifted: Gifted teachers. Handbook of gifted education, 3, 558-571.
• Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z., & Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212-220.
• Demirtaş, H. A. (2003). Sosyal kimlik kuramı, temel kavram ve varsayımlar. İletişim Araştırmaları, 1(1), 123-144.
• Enç, M. (2004). Enderun, 1.Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Seçilmiş Makaleler Kitabı, İstanbul, s. 52, 72.
• Gross, M.U.M. (2005). Exceptionally Gifted Children. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
• Harrison, C. (2000). 'But three-year-olds can't...'Glass ceilings in early childhood--Implications for gifted children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 25(2), 22-22.
• MEB. (2013). T.C. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Üstün Yetenekli Bireyler Strateji ve Uygulama Planı 2013-2017, Ankara.
• Özbay, Y., & Palancı, M. (2011). Üstün yetenekli çocuk ve ergenlerin psikososyal özellikleri. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (22).
• Özkan, D. (2009). The organisational effectiveness of science and art centers in accordance with the opinions of managers, teachers, parents and students. Unpublished master thesis. The Educational Administration and Inspection Master’s Degree Programme, Ankara.
• Park, S. & Oliver, J. S.(2009). The translation of teachers’ understanding of gifted students into instructional strategies for teaching science. J Sci Teacher Educ 20, 333–351.
• Rakow, S. (2007). All means all: Classrooms that work for advanced learners. National Middle School Association, Middle Ground, 11(1), 10-12.
• Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century a four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159.
• Sak, U. (2010). Üstün Zekalılar, Özellikleri, Tanımlamaları, Eğitimleri. Ankara: Maya Akademi Yayınevi.
• Sak, U., Ayas, M. B., Sezerel, B. B., Öpengin, E., Özdemir, N. N., & Gürbüz, S. D. (2015). Gifted and Talented Education in Turkey: Critics and Prospects/Türkiye'de Üstün Yeteneklilerin Egitiminin Elestirel Bir Degerlendirmesi. Türk Üstün Zekâ ve Egitim Dergisi, 5(2), 110.
• Sękowski, A., & Łubianka, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on gifted education–selected problems. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 46(4), 624-632.
• Şahin, F., & Levent, F. (2015). Examining the methods and strategies which classroom teachers use in the education of gifted students. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(3), 73-82.
• Şenol, C. (2011). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programlarına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (BİLSEM örneği) (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Fırat Üniversitesi, Elazığ.
• Taylor, C. A., & Kokot, S. J. (2000). The status of gifted child education in Africa. In KA. Tischler, K. & Vialle, W. (2009). Gifted students' perceptions of the characteristics of effective teachers. The Gifted Challenge: Challenging the Gifted. 115-124.
• Vialle, W., & Quigley, S. (2002). The teachers we want": Exploring the views of gifted students. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the European Council for High Ability (ECHA) Rhodes, October 9-13.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative research techniques in social sciences. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.