Türkiye’de Girişimci Liderlik: Ahmet Mukdat Ziylan’ın Bir Kooperatifçilik Hikayesi Analizi

Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 56 - 71, 20.01.2023

Gulcan Ozbolat

Abstract

Bu araştırma ile girişimci liderliğin Türkiye örneği üzerinde incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda, Ahmet Mukdat Ziylan’ın biyografik eserinde yer alan “Bir Kooperatif Hikayesi” isimli hikâye içerik ve söylem analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Çoğunlukla siyasal iletişim alanında, söylem analizi yapmak için kullanılan değerlendirici analiz yöntemi örgütsel davranış alanında uygulanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, girişimci liderliğin alt boyutları arasındaki yenilikçilik, proaktiflik ve risk alma boyutlarına ek olarak dayanıklılığın da önemli bir yere sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca proaktiflik, risk alma ve dayanıklılık boyutlarında sosyal sermayenin de etkisinin olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçların, yazın ve uygulamaya katkıları tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

Girişimci liderlik, dayanıklılık, nitel araştırma.

Entrepreneurial Leadership in Türkiye: A Cooperative Story Analysis of Ahmet Mukdat Ziylan

Abstract

This research aims to understand the roots of entrepreneurial leadership in Turkey. A Cooperative Story, a story from Ahmet Mukdat Ziylan’s biographical book, was subjected to content and discourse analysis. The evaluative analysis approach is generally used in political communication however, this study applies to organizational behavior. This research defines the dimensions of entrepreneurial leadership as innovation, proactivity, and risk-taking. It is found that resilience is a critical aspect of entrepreneurial leadership. According to the study, social capital can affect proactivity, risk-taking, and resilience. The conclusion section discusses the contributions of the findings to the literature.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Leadership, Resilience, Qualitative Research.

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 /2, 179-211.
• Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2012). Sosyal psikoloji, (çev. Okhan Gündüz). İstanbul: Kaknüs Yayınları.
• Baluku, M.M., Kikooma, J.F. & Kibanja, G.M. (2016). Psychological capital and the startup capital entrepreneurial success relationship. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 28(1), pp. 27-54.
• Bilgin N. (2014). Sosyal Bilimlerde İçerik Analizi Teknik ve Örnek Çalışmalar. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Bremer, I. (2011). Common factors between Swedish and Chinese entrepreneurial leadership styles. Business Intelligence Journal, 2 (1) 9-19.
• Chen, M. H. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 239-249.
• Cogliser, C., & Brigham, K. (2004) The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons learned. The Leadership Quarterly 15(6): 771–799.
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16(1), 7-26.
• Cunningham, J.B. &Lischeron, J. (1991) Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management 29(1): 45–61.
• Drucker, P. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper & Row.
• Fernald, L. W., Solomon, G. T., & Tarabishy, A. (2005). A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. Southern business review, 30(2), 1-10.
• Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu, T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Mevzuat Bilgi Sistemi, 5846 sayılı kanun, (Çevrimiçi) https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuatmetin/1.3.5846.pdf ehost 14.11.2022
• Goleman, D. (1998). Duygusal Zekâ Neden IQ’dan daha önemlidir. İstanbul: Varlık / Bilim. Çev. Banu Seçkin Yüksel.
• Gupta V., McMillan, I. & Surie, G. (2004) Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross- cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2): 241–260.
• Holsti, O.R. (1968). Content Analysis. Handbook of social psychology (ed. Lindzey ve Aronson), Addison Wesley.
• Ireland R. D, Hitt MA & Sirmon D. G (2003) A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management 29(6): 963–989.
• Johnson, D. (2001). What is innovation and entrepreneurship? Lessons for larger organizations. Industrial and commercial training, 33(4), 135-140.
• Koçel, T. (2017). İşletme Yöneticiliği, İstanbul: Beta Yayınları, 17. baskı
• Krueger Jr, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5-6), 411-432.
• Kuratko, D.F. (2007) Entrepreneurial leadership in the 21st century. Journal of Leadership and Organisational Studies 13(4): 1–11.
• Leitch, C.M., McMullan, C. & Harrison, R.T. (2013) The development of entrepreneurial leadership: The role of human, social and institutional capital. British Journal of Management 24(3): 347–366.
• Liñán, F. & Chen, Y.W. 2009). ‘Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp.593–617.
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management review, 21(1), 135-172.