Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Laparoskopik nefrektomide yatış süresini etkileyen faktörler: Tek Merkez 330 Vaka Deneyimi

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 229 - 234, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1129847

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmamızda laparoskopik nefrektomi yapılan hastalarda yatış süresini etkileyen faktörleri araştırmayı amaçladık.
Materyal ve metot: Ocak 2013-Aralık 2021 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde laparoskopik nefrektomi yapılan hastaların verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların demografik verileri, preoperatif, peroperatif ve postoperatif özellikleri kaydedildi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastalar yatış süresi ≤4 gün ve >4 gün olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Gruplar arasında demografik özellikler, operasyon verileri, peroperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyon durumu univariate analiz ile karşılaştırılarak yatış süresinin uzaması açısından olası risk faktörleri değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya kliniğimizde laparoskopik nefrektomi yapılan 330 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların 130’u (%39.3) kadın, 200’ü (%60.7) erkek ve ortalama yaşı 50.8±19.7 idi. Hastaların 220’sinin (%66.7) ≤4 gün, 110’unun (%33.3) ise 4 günden uzun yattığı görüldü. Operasyon süresinin uzun olduğu hastalarda yatış süresi de buna paralel olarak uzundu (p<0.001). Peroperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyon gelişen hastaların yatışlarının komplikasyon gelişmeyenlere göre daha uzun sürdüğü saptandı (sırasıyla: p=0.017, p=0.002).
Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, operasyon süresi uzun olan, peroperatif ve postoperatif komplikasyonlar gelişen hastalarda yatış süresi belirgin uzundu. Operasyon sürelerinin ve komplikasyon oranlarının olabildiğince düşürülmesi yatış süresini azaltmada faydalı olabilir.

References

  • Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991;146:278-82.
  • Siqueira JR TM, Kuo RL, Gardner TA, et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol. 2002;168:1361-5.
  • Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, et al. Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology. 1994;43:607-13.
  • Wilson BG, Deans GT, Kelly J, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience and cost implications. Br J Urol. 1995;75:276-80.
  • Fornara P, Doehn C, Friedrich HJ, et al. Nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in 249 patients with benign renal disease. Eur Urol. 2001;40:24-31.
  • Gill IS, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Advances in urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 1995;154:1275-94.
  • Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, et al. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD006632
  • Clark DE and Ryan LM. Concurrent prediction of hospital mortality and length of stay from risk factors on admission. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(3):631-45.
  • Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Association of surgical care improvement Project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):705-14.
  • Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, et al. Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):463.
  • Polverejan E, Gardiner JC, Bradley CJ, et al. Estimating mean hospital cost as a function of length of stay and patient characteristics. Health Econ. 2003;12(11):93547.
  • Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, et al. Risk factors for adverse outcomes after transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Cancer. 2006;106(7):1527-35.
  • Aronow HD, Peyser PA, Eagle KA, et al. Predictors of length of stay after coronary stenting. Am Heart J. 2001;142(5):799-5.
  • Ghali WA, Hall RE, Ash AS, et al. Identifying preand postoperative predictors of cost and length of stay for coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14(6):248-54.
  • Wallner LP, Dunn RL, Sarma AV, et al. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after urologic surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(6):904-13.
  • Dimick JB, Cowan JA, Colletti LM et al: Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 2004; 139(2):137-41.
  • Jeldres C, Suardi N, Capitanio U, et al. High surgical volume is associated with a lower rate of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008; 102(4):463-67.
  • Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998; 280(20):1747-51.
  • Khuri SF and Henderson WG. The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care. World J Surg. 2005; 29(10):1222-29.
  • Keeler EB, Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, et al. Hospital characteristics and quality of care. JAMA. 1992;268(13):1709-14.
  • Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128-37.
  • Miller DC, Daignault S, Wolf JS Jr, et al. Hospital characteristics and use of innovative surgical therapies among patients with kidney cancer. Med Care. 2008;46:372-79.
  • Konety BR, Allareddy V, Modak S, et al. Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(13):2006-12.
  • Finlayson E, Goodney P and Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):721-25.
  • Cheema IA, Manecksha RP, Murphy M, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience with 120 cases. Ir Med J. 2010;103:49-51.
  • Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153-9.
  • Azawi NH, Christensen T, Petri AL, et al. Prolonged length of hospital stay in Denmark after nephrectomy. Dan Med J. 2012;59(6):A4446.
Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 229 - 234, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1129847

Abstract

References

  • Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991;146:278-82.
  • Siqueira JR TM, Kuo RL, Gardner TA, et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol. 2002;168:1361-5.
  • Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, et al. Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology. 1994;43:607-13.
  • Wilson BG, Deans GT, Kelly J, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience and cost implications. Br J Urol. 1995;75:276-80.
  • Fornara P, Doehn C, Friedrich HJ, et al. Nonrandomized comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in 249 patients with benign renal disease. Eur Urol. 2001;40:24-31.
  • Gill IS, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Advances in urological laparoscopy. J Urol. 1995;154:1275-94.
  • Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, et al. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD006632
  • Clark DE and Ryan LM. Concurrent prediction of hospital mortality and length of stay from risk factors on admission. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(3):631-45.
  • Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, et al. Association of surgical care improvement Project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):705-14.
  • Davenport DL, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, et al. Preoperative risk factors and surgical complexity are more predictive of costs than postoperative complications: a case study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):463.
  • Polverejan E, Gardiner JC, Bradley CJ, et al. Estimating mean hospital cost as a function of length of stay and patient characteristics. Health Econ. 2003;12(11):93547.
  • Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, et al. Risk factors for adverse outcomes after transurethral resection of bladder tumors. Cancer. 2006;106(7):1527-35.
  • Aronow HD, Peyser PA, Eagle KA, et al. Predictors of length of stay after coronary stenting. Am Heart J. 2001;142(5):799-5.
  • Ghali WA, Hall RE, Ash AS, et al. Identifying preand postoperative predictors of cost and length of stay for coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Med Qual. 1999;14(6):248-54.
  • Wallner LP, Dunn RL, Sarma AV, et al. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after urologic surgery: the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(6):904-13.
  • Dimick JB, Cowan JA, Colletti LM et al: Hospital teaching status and outcomes of complex surgical procedures in the United States. Arch Surg 2004; 139(2):137-41.
  • Jeldres C, Suardi N, Capitanio U, et al. High surgical volume is associated with a lower rate of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008; 102(4):463-67.
  • Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998; 280(20):1747-51.
  • Khuri SF and Henderson WG. The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care. World J Surg. 2005; 29(10):1222-29.
  • Keeler EB, Rubenstein LV, Kahn KL, et al. Hospital characteristics and quality of care. JAMA. 1992;268(13):1709-14.
  • Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128-37.
  • Miller DC, Daignault S, Wolf JS Jr, et al. Hospital characteristics and use of innovative surgical therapies among patients with kidney cancer. Med Care. 2008;46:372-79.
  • Konety BR, Allareddy V, Modak S, et al. Mortality after major surgery for urologic cancers in specialized urology hospitals: are they any better? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(13):2006-12.
  • Finlayson E, Goodney P and Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):721-25.
  • Cheema IA, Manecksha RP, Murphy M, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial experience with 120 cases. Ir Med J. 2010;103:49-51.
  • Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153-9.
  • Azawi NH, Christensen T, Petri AL, et al. Prolonged length of hospital stay in Denmark after nephrectomy. Dan Med J. 2012;59(6):A4446.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Urology
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Kadir Karkin 0000-0002-4324-3032

Ediz Vuruşkan 0000-0002-3446-0430

Early Pub Date August 18, 2022
Publication Date August 31, 2022
Acceptance Date August 13, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karkin, K., & Vuruşkan, E. (2022). Laparoskopik nefrektomide yatış süresini etkileyen faktörler: Tek Merkez 330 Vaka Deneyimi. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences, 5(2), 229-234. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1129847

download

You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.