Clinical Research
BibTex RIS Cite

Obez Kişilerde Tıkanırcasına Yeme Ataklarının Şiddetinin Azaltılması

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 259 - 266, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1152333

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışma, Adana Şehir Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Obe-zite Merkezi Eğitim Programına kayıtlı Obez kişilerde tıkınırcasına yeme bozukluğunun şiddetindeki değişimi analiz etmeyi amaçla-mıştır.
Yöntemler: Çalışma, kesintili bir zaman serisi tasarımına sahip, tek kollu, prospektif, yarı deneysel bir çalışmaydı. Dahil edilme kriter¬leri, eğitim için merkeze kayıtlı olmak, 18-65 yaş arasında olmak, vücut kitle indeksi (VKİ) 30'a eşit veya üzerinde olmak ve tıkınır¬casına yeme bozukluğuna sahip olmaktı. Tıkanırcasına yeme bo¬zukluğu değerlendirme (BEDE) formu, yalnızca DSM-5 Tıkanırca¬sına yeme bozukluğu (BED) tanısı ve şiddet kriterleri kullanılarak yapılandırılmış bir formdu. İlerleme kaydı, bir doktor, diyetisyen, psikolog ve fizyoterapistin uyguladığı haftalık bir müfredatı ve aylık bireysel toplantı verilerini içeriyordu.
Bulgular: BEDE raporları, son değerlendirmede 65 hastanın BED tanısının altında puan almasıyla önemli bir gelişme gösterdi. Epi-zotlardaki iyileşme açısından cinsiyetler arasında fark yoktu. Mev¬cut çalışma, yaklaşık 80 saat süren yirmi haftalık eğitimden sonra hastaların daha az atak bildirdiğini gösterdi.
Sonuç: Tedavi arayan obez hastalarda tıkınırcasına yeme atakları-nın şiddetini azaltmak için eğitimin etkili olduğu düşünülebilir.

References

  • 1. American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, editors. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 947 p.
  • 2. Qian J, Hu Q, Wan Y, Li T, Wu M, Ren Z, et al. Prevalence of eating disorders in the general population: a systematic review. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25:212–23.
  • 3. Bulik CM, Kleiman SC, Yilmaz Z. Genetic epidemiology of eating disorders: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016;29:383–8.
  • 4. Dakanalis A, Riva G, Serino S, Colmegna F, Clerici M. Classifying Adults with Binge Eating Disorder Based on Severity Levels: Severity of Binge Eating Disorder. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017;25:268–74.
  • 5. Linardon J. Meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on the core eating disorder maintaining mechanisms: implications for mechanisms of therapeutic change. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018;47:107–25.
  • 6. Waller G, Schmidt U, Treasure J, Murray K, Aleyna J, Emanuelli F, et al. Problems across care pathways in specialist adult eating disorder services. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33:26–9.
  • 7. Leavey G, Vallianatou C, Johnson-Sabine E, Rae S, Gunputh V. Psychosocial barriers to engagement with an eating disorder service: a qualitative analysis of failure to attend. Eat Disord. 2011;19:425–40.
  • 8. Eaton CM. Eating Disorder Recovery: A Metaethnography. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2019;107839031984910.
  • 9. Vall E, Wade TD. Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Erratum. Int J Eat Disord. 2016;49:432–3.
  • 10. Evans SR. Clinical trial structures. J Exp Stroke Transl Med. 2010;3:8–18.
  • 11. Price P, Jhangiani R, Chiang I. Research Methods in Psychology. 2nd ed. BCCampus; 2015. 135–141 p.
  • 12. Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. BMJ. 2015;351:h4672.

Mitigating the Severity of Binge Eating Episodes in Obese Individuals

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 259 - 266, 31.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1152333

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to analyze the change in the severity of binge eating disorder in obese individuals registered to the Adana City Training and Research Hospital Obesity Center training program.
Methods: The study was a single-arm, prospective, quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time-series design. Inclusion criteria were having registered to the center for training, age between 18 to 65 years, a body mass index (BMI) equal to or over 30 and having binge eating disorder. Binge eating disorder evaluation (BEDE) was a structured form exclusively using DSM-5 binge eating disorder (BED) diagnosis and the severity criteria. The progress record included a weekly curriculum that a physician, dietitian, psychologist administered, and the physiotherapist and the monthly individual meetings data.
Results: The BEDE reports showed a significant improvement, with 65 of the patients scoring below the BED diagnosis at the final evaluation. There was no difference between the genders regarding improvement in episodes. The current study showed that after twenty weeks of training that lasted for approximately 80 hours, the patients reported fewer episodes.
Conclusions The training could be considered efficacious for reducing the severity of binge eating episodes in obese patients seeking treatment.

References

  • 1. American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, editors. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. 947 p.
  • 2. Qian J, Hu Q, Wan Y, Li T, Wu M, Ren Z, et al. Prevalence of eating disorders in the general population: a systematic review. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25:212–23.
  • 3. Bulik CM, Kleiman SC, Yilmaz Z. Genetic epidemiology of eating disorders: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016;29:383–8.
  • 4. Dakanalis A, Riva G, Serino S, Colmegna F, Clerici M. Classifying Adults with Binge Eating Disorder Based on Severity Levels: Severity of Binge Eating Disorder. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017;25:268–74.
  • 5. Linardon J. Meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy on the core eating disorder maintaining mechanisms: implications for mechanisms of therapeutic change. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018;47:107–25.
  • 6. Waller G, Schmidt U, Treasure J, Murray K, Aleyna J, Emanuelli F, et al. Problems across care pathways in specialist adult eating disorder services. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33:26–9.
  • 7. Leavey G, Vallianatou C, Johnson-Sabine E, Rae S, Gunputh V. Psychosocial barriers to engagement with an eating disorder service: a qualitative analysis of failure to attend. Eat Disord. 2011;19:425–40.
  • 8. Eaton CM. Eating Disorder Recovery: A Metaethnography. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2019;107839031984910.
  • 9. Vall E, Wade TD. Predictors of treatment outcome in individuals with eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Erratum. Int J Eat Disord. 2016;49:432–3.
  • 10. Evans SR. Clinical trial structures. J Exp Stroke Transl Med. 2010;3:8–18.
  • 11. Price P, Jhangiani R, Chiang I. Research Methods in Psychology. 2nd ed. BCCampus; 2015. 135–141 p.
  • 12. Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. BMJ. 2015;351:h4672.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Clinical Sciences
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Cenk Belibağlı 0000-0002-0074-4611

Early Pub Date August 18, 2022
Publication Date August 31, 2022
Acceptance Date August 27, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Belibağlı, M. C. (2022). Mitigating the Severity of Binge Eating Episodes in Obese Individuals. Journal of Cukurova Anesthesia and Surgical Sciences, 5(2), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1152333

download

You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.