Abstract
Giriş: Çalışmamızda gebelik sırasında COVİD-19 hastalığını geçirmiş olan annelerin bebekleri ve COVİD-19 hastalığına yakalanmamış olan annelerin bebekleri yenidoğan tarama ABR(İşitsel Beyin Sapı Cevapları, T-ABR) sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.
Materyal ve Metot: …. Hastanesi Odyoloji Ünitesinde işitme tarama testi uygulanan, Nisan 2019 ile Eylül 2021 tarihleri arasındaki yenidoğanlar çalışmaya dahil edilmiş olup gebelik sırasında anneleri COVİD-19 hastalığını geçirmiş olan yenidoğanlar Grup 1; geçirmemiş olanlar ise Grup 2 olarak gruplandırıldı. Bu iki grup; doğum kilosu, doğum haftası, doğum şekli, ilk işitme test sonucu ve referans merkeze sevk edilme açısından karşılaştırılarak istatistiksel olarak farklılıklar araştırıldı.
Sonuç: Çalışmamıza 472’si (%63.3) kız , 274’ü de (%36.7) erkek olmak üzere toplam 746 yenidoğan bebek dahil edildi. Grup 1’de 202(%27.1), Grup 2’de 544(%72.9) yenidoğan bulunmaktaydı. Test edilme yaşı açısından iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmedi (p>0.05). İlk testten geçme açısından sağ ve sol kulak, iki grupta ayrı ayrı değerlendirildiğinde; sırasıyla sağ ve sol kulak için işitme testinden geçmesi açından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farlılık tespit edilmedi (p=0.234, p=0.15). Doğum kilosu ve referans merkeze sevk edilme açısından iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmedi (p>0.05),(p=0.775).
Tartışma: Annesi gebelik sırasında COVİD-19 hastalığını geçiren ve geçirmeyen yenidoğanların işitme tarama sonuçları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmadı. Gebelik sırasında annenin geçirdiği COVİD-19 hastalığı, yenidoğan işitme tarama sonuçlarını değiştirmemiş ve klinik olarak işitme kaybı yapmadığı görülmüştür.
Supporting Institution
yok
References
- 1.Bolat H, Bebitoglu FG, Ozbas S, et al. National newborn hearing screening program in Turkey: struggles and implementations between 2004 and 2008. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 12: 1621-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.002
- 2.Demir E, Dagli AS, Akoglu E, et al. Newborn Hearing Screening by Otoacoustic Emissions and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Hatay-A prospective study. Med J Mustafa Kemal University. 2019; 10: 46-50 . 3.Sezer HO, Topal K, Aksoy H, et al. Determination of risk factors for hearing loss in infants admitted to the hearing screening units and studying their effects on hearing screening test results. Med J Mustafa Kemal University. 2017; 30: 19-26.
- 4.Mustafa MWM. Audiological profile of asymptomatic Covid-19 PCR-positive cases. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; 41: 102483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102483
- 5.Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey [İnternet]. General Directorate of Public Health Child and Adolescent Health Department. Scanning Programs. Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Scanning ABR Protocol Flow Chart. Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/cocuk_ergen_db/ dokumanlar/Guncel_Test_Protokolu_.pdf
- 6.Ngui LX, Tang IP, Prepageran N, et al. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 120: 184-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.045
- 7.Sarı K. Our Newborn Hearing Screening Test Results. KBB-Fo-rum. 2021; 20: 115-21.
- 8.Erdogdu S. Our newborn hearing screening results. North Clin Istanb. 2021; 12: 167-71. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2021.30806
- 9.Watkin PM. Neonatal screening for hearing impairment. Semin Neonatol. 2001; 6: 501-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/siny.2001.0081
- 10.Cebulla M, Hofmann S, Shehata-Dieler W. Sensitivity of ABR based newborn screening with the MB11 BERAphone. Int J Pe¬diatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 78: 756-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.003
- 11.Raghuwanshi SK, Gargava A, Kulkarani V, et al. Role of Otoa-coustic Emission Test in Neonatal Screening at Tertiary Center. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 71: 1535-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01606-0
- 12.Korver AM, Smith RJ, Van Camp G, et al. Congenital hearing loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; 12: 16094. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.94
- 13.Cohen BE, Durstenfeld A, Roehm PC. Viral causes of hearing loss: a review for hearing health professionals. Trends Hear. 2014; 18: 2331216514541361. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514541361
- 14.Faure-Bardon V, Isnard P, Roux N, et al. Protein expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, a SARS-CoV-2-specific recep¬tor, in fetal and placental tissues throughout gestation: new in¬sight for perinatal counseling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 57: 242-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22178
- 15.Celik T, Simsek A, Koca CF, et al. Evaluation of cochlear func-tions in İnfants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 intrauterine. Am J Oto-laryngol. 2021; 42: 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102982
- 16.Alan MA, Alan C. Hearing screening outcomes in neonates of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women. Int J Pediatr Otorhino-laryngol. 2021; 146: 110754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110754
Abstract
Objective: In our study, it was aimed to compare the newborn screening ABR (Auditory Brainstem Responses, AABR) results of babies of mothers who had COVID-19 disease during pregnancy and babies of mothers who did not have COVID-19 disease.
Methods: Newborns who underwent hearing screening tests in …. Hospital Audiology Unit between April 2019 and September 2021 were included in the study, and newborns whose mothers had COVID-19 disease during pregnancy were called Group 1, and those who did not have were called Group 2. Statistical difference was studied by comparing these two groups by their birth weight, week of birth, type of delivery, first hearing test result, and referral to a reference center.
Results: A total of 746 newborn babies, 472/746 (63.3%) female and 274/746 (36.7%) males, were included in our study. There were 202/746 (27.1%) newborns in Group 1 and 544/746 (72.9%) newborns in Group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of testing age (p>0.05). When the right and left ears were evaluated separately in two groups in terms of passing the first test; no statistically significant difference was found in terms of passing the hearing test for the right and left ears, respectively (p=0.234, p=0.15). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of birth weight and referral to a reference center (p>0.05), (p=0.775).
Conclusion: The COVID-19 disease of the mother during pregnancy does not affect the newborn hearing screening results.
References
- 1.Bolat H, Bebitoglu FG, Ozbas S, et al. National newborn hearing screening program in Turkey: struggles and implementations between 2004 and 2008. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 12: 1621-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.08.002
- 2.Demir E, Dagli AS, Akoglu E, et al. Newborn Hearing Screening by Otoacoustic Emissions and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response in Hatay-A prospective study. Med J Mustafa Kemal University. 2019; 10: 46-50 . 3.Sezer HO, Topal K, Aksoy H, et al. Determination of risk factors for hearing loss in infants admitted to the hearing screening units and studying their effects on hearing screening test results. Med J Mustafa Kemal University. 2017; 30: 19-26.
- 4.Mustafa MWM. Audiological profile of asymptomatic Covid-19 PCR-positive cases. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; 41: 102483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102483
- 5.Ministry of Health of the Republic of Turkey [İnternet]. General Directorate of Public Health Child and Adolescent Health Department. Scanning Programs. Newborn Hearing Screening Program. Scanning ABR Protocol Flow Chart. Available at: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/cocuk_ergen_db/ dokumanlar/Guncel_Test_Protokolu_.pdf
- 6.Ngui LX, Tang IP, Prepageran N, et al. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 120: 184-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.045
- 7.Sarı K. Our Newborn Hearing Screening Test Results. KBB-Fo-rum. 2021; 20: 115-21.
- 8.Erdogdu S. Our newborn hearing screening results. North Clin Istanb. 2021; 12: 167-71. https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2021.30806
- 9.Watkin PM. Neonatal screening for hearing impairment. Semin Neonatol. 2001; 6: 501-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/siny.2001.0081
- 10.Cebulla M, Hofmann S, Shehata-Dieler W. Sensitivity of ABR based newborn screening with the MB11 BERAphone. Int J Pe¬diatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014; 78: 756-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.02.003
- 11.Raghuwanshi SK, Gargava A, Kulkarani V, et al. Role of Otoa-coustic Emission Test in Neonatal Screening at Tertiary Center. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 71: 1535-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01606-0
- 12.Korver AM, Smith RJ, Van Camp G, et al. Congenital hearing loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; 12: 16094. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.94
- 13.Cohen BE, Durstenfeld A, Roehm PC. Viral causes of hearing loss: a review for hearing health professionals. Trends Hear. 2014; 18: 2331216514541361. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514541361
- 14.Faure-Bardon V, Isnard P, Roux N, et al. Protein expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, a SARS-CoV-2-specific recep¬tor, in fetal and placental tissues throughout gestation: new in¬sight for perinatal counseling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 57: 242-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22178
- 15.Celik T, Simsek A, Koca CF, et al. Evaluation of cochlear func-tions in İnfants exposed to SARS-CoV-2 intrauterine. Am J Oto-laryngol. 2021; 42: 102982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102982
- 16.Alan MA, Alan C. Hearing screening outcomes in neonates of SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant women. Int J Pediatr Otorhino-laryngol. 2021; 146: 110754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110754
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Otorhinolaryngology |
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 31, 2023 |
| Acceptance Date | August 29, 2023 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2023 Volume: 6 Issue: 2 |
