Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns

Year 2021, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 419 - 427, 07.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.799558

Abstract

Türkiye'de ve Dünya'da enerji talebi sürekli artmaktadır. Gezegenimizde enerji ihtiyacını karşılamak için kullanılan fosil yakıt kaynaklarının hızla tükenmesinin yanı sıra ortam sıcaklıkları yükselmekte, buzullar erimekte ve doğal afetler meydana gelmektedir. Ayrıca toprak, su ve hava kirliliğinin olumsuz etkilerinden dolayı insanlar, hayvanlar ve bitkiler büyük ölçüde zarar görmektedir. Güneş enerjisi, tükenmeyen, temiz ve kolay erişilebilen bir enerjidir. Ülkemiz sahip olduğu güneş enerjisi potansiyeli bakımından birçok ülkeye göre şanslı durumdadır ve söz konusu potansiyelin değerlendirilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının önem kazanmasıyla birlikte güneş enerjisini doğrudan elektrik enerjisine dönüştürebilen, çevreyi kirletmeyen ve uygulanması kolay olan fotovoltaik (PV) paneller her geçen gün daha da yaygınlaşmaktadır. Fotovoltaik panellerin eğim açısı ve konumu elektrik enerji üretimini doğrudan etkileyen parametrelerdir. Her alanda olduğu gibi tarımsal üretim faaliyetlerinde de elektrik enerjisi yoğun olarak kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle hayvansal üretim sistemlerinde, yüksek mekanizasyon ve otomasyon kullanımı nedeniyle elektrik enerjisi maliyeti, işletmeler için önemli bir girdi olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Bursa ilinde 50 baş kapasiteli süt sığırcılığı ahırında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Farklı yönlerde çatıya gelen güneş ışığının nasıl değiştiğini ortaya koymak amacıyla barınak 4 farklı (Kuzey-Güney, Doğu-Batı, Kuzeydoğu-Güneybatı, Kuzeybatı-Güneydoğu) yönde konumlandırılarak her bir yön için üretilen elektrik enerjisi belirlenmiştir. Çatılara yerleştirilecek panellerin ürettiği elektrik enerjisi PVSOL yazılımı kullanılarak belirlendi. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre Kuzey-Güney (K), Doğu-Batı (E), Kuzeydoğu-Güneybatı (KD) ve Kuzeybatı-Güneydoğu (KB) yönelimli panellerden üretilen elektrik enerjisi miktarı sırasıyla 179.453,0 kWh, 159.655,0 kWh, 175.950,0 kWh ve 138.245,0 kWh olarak belirlenmiştir. 50 baş kapasiteli ahırın yıllık elektrik enerjisi ihtiyacı 25.200,0 kWh olarak hesaplanmıştır. Bu durumda K, D, KD ve KB yönlerinden üretilen enerjinin ahırın ihtiyacını 5 ila 7 kat karşıladığı hesaplanmıştır.

References

  • Akyüz, E., Bayraktar, M., Oktay, Z. (2009). A feasibility study on hybrid renewable energy systems for the industrial broiler sector: An application. Journal of Balıkesir University Science and Technology Institute, Volume: 11, Issue 2, p. 44-54.
  • Anonymous (2014). TMMOB Chamber of Mechanical Engineers. “Turkey's Energy View” No: MMO/2014/616, Ankara.
  • Anonymous (2015a). Energy and Natural Resources Ministry. Information Center, “Sun” http://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Gunes, (Access date: 06.06.2015).
  • Anonymous (2015b) ECA “Solar Energy Systems” http://www.elginkan. com.tr/assets/media/mediaFile_52f889fc17d27.pdf. (Access date: 06.06.2015).
  • Anonymous (2017). Bursa Agricultural Investment Guide. Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Livestock, Strategy Development Department, Agricultural Investor Advisory Office, Bursa, 2017.
  • Bayraktar, K G. (2016). “Güneş Ülkemizin Enerji Geleceğidir.” 13 (Saha yayın), 52-56.
  • Bhol, R., Dash, R., Pradhan, A., Ali, S. (2015). Environmental effect assessment on the performance of the solar PV panel. Paper presented at the Circuit, Power, and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), International Conference on.
  • Bilgili E., Aybek A. (2019). Evaluatıon in Terms of Requırements in Applıcatıon of Carrıed Out Scıentıfıc Studies for Structural and Mechanization Properties of Daıry Cattle Farms in Turkey. Çukurova II. International Multidisciplinary Studies Congress, Full paper, p: 817-833. 26-28 April, Adana.
  • Byrne, J., Glover, L., Hegedus, S., Vanwicklen, G. (2005). The Potential of Solar Electric Applications for Delaware’s Poultry Farms. Working paper. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, University of Delaware.
  • Collar, C., Shultz, T., Peterson, N., Wubishet, A. (2000). Higginbotham G. Dairy and Livestock, California Dairy Energy Project, Research Report, California.
  • Dagtekin M. (2012). Tecno-economic Feasibility Analysis of Solar Energy Use in Cooling of Broiler Poultry Houses. Cukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 27 (2): 11 - 20.
  • EEG (2016). “The EU Project BETTER-Introduction to Modelling Framework”. (Access date: 28.10.2016). http://better-project.net/sites/default/ files/Introduction to the modeling framework_ TUWIEN. pdf.
  • Erensoy, K., Altan, A, Bayraktar, H. (2015). Characteristics of Energy Usage and Energy Savings Opportunities in Environmentally Controlled Egg Production Houses. 9. National Animal Science Congress (Konya), Full-Text Book, September 3-5. pp: 495-500.
  • Irwanto, M., Irwan, Y., Safwati, I., Leow, W.-Z., Gomesh, N., 2014. Analysis simulation of the photovoltaic output performance. Paper presented at the Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), IEEE 8th International.
  • Kasap A. (1985). Optimum Use Limits of Electrical Energy in Dairy Cattle Enterprises. 9th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, May 20-22, Adana.
  • Kurc, H. C. and Kocaman I. (2016.) Examination of Cattle Animal Farms Based On Structural Properties in The Tekirdag-Malkara Region Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 13 (04): 84-91.
  • Mohtasha, J. (2015). Renewable Energies. Energy Procedia, 74, 1289-1297.
  • Ozden, T., Karaveli, A B., Akinoglu, B G. (2020). Comparison of the Models of Solar PV Performance Calculations for Ankara – Middle Anatolia. European Journal of Science and Technology, (18), 54-60.
  • Ozden, T., Karaveli, A B., Akinoglu, B G. (2020). Comparison of the Models of Solar PV Performance Calculations for Ankara – Middle Anatolia. European Journal of Science and Technology, (18), 54-60.
  • Ozyürek, S., Kocyigit, R., Tüzemen, N. (2014). Structural Features of Dairy Farmers in the Erzincan: The Example of Çayırlı District. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 11 (3): 19-26.
  • Peterson R. (2008). Energy Management for Dairy Farms. Presentation at the Farm Energy Audit Training for Field Advisors Workshop.
  • Sharma, R., Gidwani, L. (2017). "Grid-connected solar PV system design and calculation by using PV∗SOL premium simulation tool for campus hostels of RTU Kota," 2017 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Kollam, pp. 1-5.
  • Soyak, A., Soysal, M. I., Gürcan, E .K. (2007). In Investigation of Structural Properties of Dairy Enterprises and Morphologic Characteristics of Black and White Cattle in Tekirdag Province. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 4 (3): 297-305.
  • Thomas R. (2003). Photovoltaics and architecture: Taylor & Francis, New York.
  • Tuik (2019). Turkish Statistical Institute. Livestock Statistics for Bursa Province, 2018. (Access date: 20.08.2019).
  • Türkboyları E.Y., Yüksel A. N. (2021). Use of Solar Panel System in Vermicompost (Worm Manure) Production Facilities as Source of Energy. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 18 (1), 91-97.
  • Yaslıoglu E., Ilhan H. (2016). An Analysis of Dairy Cattle Production in Southern Marmara in terms of Heat Stress. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 13 (04).

The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns

Year 2021, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 419 - 427, 07.09.2021
https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.799558

Abstract

In Turkey and the World, energy demand is continuously increased. In addition to the rapid depletion of fossil fuel resources used to supply the energy needs, ambient temperatures is risen, glaciers are melt and natural disasters are occured in our planet. In addition, people, animals and plants are greatly damaged due to the adverse effects of soil, water and air pollution. Solar energy is renewable, clean and easily accessible energy. Our country is more advantageous in terms of solar energy potential in comparison to many other countries and benefitting from this potential is very important. With the increasing importance of renewable energy sources, photovoltaic (PV) panels, which are able to convert solar energy directly into electrical energy, are not polluting the environment and easy to implement, are become more common. The inclination angle and position of the photovoltaic panels are the parameters that directly affect the production of electrical energy. Electrical energy is extensively used in agricultural production activities, as in every field. Especially, in animal production systems, the cost of electrical energy is an important input due to the high mechanization and the use of automation. This study was carried out in the dairy cattle barn with a capacity of 50 head in Bursa province. It was aimed to determine the amount of electrical energy produced by photovoltaic (PV) panels, located on the barn roof in four different directions (North-South, East-West, Northeast-Southwest, Northwest-Southeast), and also to find out whether produced energy is sufficient or not to meet the energy requirement of the barn. The electrical energy produced by the panels to be placed on the roofs was determined by using PVSOL software. According to the results, the amount of electrical energy produced from the panels with North-South (N), East-West (E), Northeast-Southwest (NE) and Northwest-Southeast (NW) orientation was determined as 179.453,0 kWh, 159.655,0 kWh, 175.950,0 kWh and 138.245,0 kWh, respectively. The annual electrical energy requirement of the barn with 50 head capacity was calculated as 25.200,0 kWh. In this case, it was calculated that the energy produced from the N, E, NE and NW orientations met the requirements of the barn by 5 to 7 times.

References

  • Akyüz, E., Bayraktar, M., Oktay, Z. (2009). A feasibility study on hybrid renewable energy systems for the industrial broiler sector: An application. Journal of Balıkesir University Science and Technology Institute, Volume: 11, Issue 2, p. 44-54.
  • Anonymous (2014). TMMOB Chamber of Mechanical Engineers. “Turkey's Energy View” No: MMO/2014/616, Ankara.
  • Anonymous (2015a). Energy and Natural Resources Ministry. Information Center, “Sun” http://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Gunes, (Access date: 06.06.2015).
  • Anonymous (2015b) ECA “Solar Energy Systems” http://www.elginkan. com.tr/assets/media/mediaFile_52f889fc17d27.pdf. (Access date: 06.06.2015).
  • Anonymous (2017). Bursa Agricultural Investment Guide. Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Livestock, Strategy Development Department, Agricultural Investor Advisory Office, Bursa, 2017.
  • Bayraktar, K G. (2016). “Güneş Ülkemizin Enerji Geleceğidir.” 13 (Saha yayın), 52-56.
  • Bhol, R., Dash, R., Pradhan, A., Ali, S. (2015). Environmental effect assessment on the performance of the solar PV panel. Paper presented at the Circuit, Power, and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), International Conference on.
  • Bilgili E., Aybek A. (2019). Evaluatıon in Terms of Requırements in Applıcatıon of Carrıed Out Scıentıfıc Studies for Structural and Mechanization Properties of Daıry Cattle Farms in Turkey. Çukurova II. International Multidisciplinary Studies Congress, Full paper, p: 817-833. 26-28 April, Adana.
  • Byrne, J., Glover, L., Hegedus, S., Vanwicklen, G. (2005). The Potential of Solar Electric Applications for Delaware’s Poultry Farms. Working paper. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, University of Delaware.
  • Collar, C., Shultz, T., Peterson, N., Wubishet, A. (2000). Higginbotham G. Dairy and Livestock, California Dairy Energy Project, Research Report, California.
  • Dagtekin M. (2012). Tecno-economic Feasibility Analysis of Solar Energy Use in Cooling of Broiler Poultry Houses. Cukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 27 (2): 11 - 20.
  • EEG (2016). “The EU Project BETTER-Introduction to Modelling Framework”. (Access date: 28.10.2016). http://better-project.net/sites/default/ files/Introduction to the modeling framework_ TUWIEN. pdf.
  • Erensoy, K., Altan, A, Bayraktar, H. (2015). Characteristics of Energy Usage and Energy Savings Opportunities in Environmentally Controlled Egg Production Houses. 9. National Animal Science Congress (Konya), Full-Text Book, September 3-5. pp: 495-500.
  • Irwanto, M., Irwan, Y., Safwati, I., Leow, W.-Z., Gomesh, N., 2014. Analysis simulation of the photovoltaic output performance. Paper presented at the Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), IEEE 8th International.
  • Kasap A. (1985). Optimum Use Limits of Electrical Energy in Dairy Cattle Enterprises. 9th National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, May 20-22, Adana.
  • Kurc, H. C. and Kocaman I. (2016.) Examination of Cattle Animal Farms Based On Structural Properties in The Tekirdag-Malkara Region Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 13 (04): 84-91.
  • Mohtasha, J. (2015). Renewable Energies. Energy Procedia, 74, 1289-1297.
  • Ozden, T., Karaveli, A B., Akinoglu, B G. (2020). Comparison of the Models of Solar PV Performance Calculations for Ankara – Middle Anatolia. European Journal of Science and Technology, (18), 54-60.
  • Ozden, T., Karaveli, A B., Akinoglu, B G. (2020). Comparison of the Models of Solar PV Performance Calculations for Ankara – Middle Anatolia. European Journal of Science and Technology, (18), 54-60.
  • Ozyürek, S., Kocyigit, R., Tüzemen, N. (2014). Structural Features of Dairy Farmers in the Erzincan: The Example of Çayırlı District. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 11 (3): 19-26.
  • Peterson R. (2008). Energy Management for Dairy Farms. Presentation at the Farm Energy Audit Training for Field Advisors Workshop.
  • Sharma, R., Gidwani, L. (2017). "Grid-connected solar PV system design and calculation by using PV∗SOL premium simulation tool for campus hostels of RTU Kota," 2017 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Kollam, pp. 1-5.
  • Soyak, A., Soysal, M. I., Gürcan, E .K. (2007). In Investigation of Structural Properties of Dairy Enterprises and Morphologic Characteristics of Black and White Cattle in Tekirdag Province. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 4 (3): 297-305.
  • Thomas R. (2003). Photovoltaics and architecture: Taylor & Francis, New York.
  • Tuik (2019). Turkish Statistical Institute. Livestock Statistics for Bursa Province, 2018. (Access date: 20.08.2019).
  • Türkboyları E.Y., Yüksel A. N. (2021). Use of Solar Panel System in Vermicompost (Worm Manure) Production Facilities as Source of Energy. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 18 (1), 91-97.
  • Yaslıoglu E., Ilhan H. (2016). An Analysis of Dairy Cattle Production in Southern Marmara in terms of Heat Stress. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty. 13 (04).
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Hatice Delice 0000-0002-0781-2154

Erkan Yaslıoğlu 0000-0002-3865-7863

Publication Date September 7, 2021
Submission Date September 24, 2020
Acceptance Date July 16, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 18 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Delice, H., & Yaslıoğlu, E. (2021). The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(3), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.799558
AMA Delice H, Yaslıoğlu E. The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns. JOTAF. September 2021;18(3):419-427. doi:10.33462/jotaf.799558
Chicago Delice, Hatice, and Erkan Yaslıoğlu. “The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18, no. 3 (September 2021): 419-27. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.799558.
EndNote Delice H, Yaslıoğlu E (September 1, 2021) The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18 3 419–427.
IEEE H. Delice and E. Yaslıoğlu, “The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns”, JOTAF, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 419–427, 2021, doi: 10.33462/jotaf.799558.
ISNAD Delice, Hatice - Yaslıoğlu, Erkan. “The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18/3 (September 2021), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.799558.
JAMA Delice H, Yaslıoğlu E. The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns. JOTAF. 2021;18:419–427.
MLA Delice, Hatice and Erkan Yaslıoğlu. “The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns”. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 18, no. 3, 2021, pp. 419-27, doi:10.33462/jotaf.799558.
Vancouver Delice H, Yaslıoğlu E. The Effect of Building Orientation on Utilization of Solar Energy in Dairy Cattle Barns. JOTAF. 2021;18(3):419-27.