Optimizing seismic performance: Integrating friction dampers into spherical liquid tanks

Year 2024, , 294 - 304, 30.09.2024

Yunus Uçar Mehmet Fatih Altan

https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1535527

Abstract

This study addresses the vital challenge of ensuring the safe storage of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) in spherical tanks during seismic events, focusing on the crucial balance between meeting seis- mic performance criteria and mitigating economic losses due to potential operational disrup- tions from necessary retrofitting efforts. In response to this challenge, we present a case study on retrofitting an LNG tank near the North Anatolian Fault (NAF) line of Türkiye. Through a com- prehensive seismic evaluation, this study reveals inadequacies in the existing case's compliance with seismic criteria. It suggests a remedy involving the increased stiffness of lateral force-resist- ing members coupled with the utilization of friction dampers. Following the proposed stiffness increase achieved through retrofitting, our approach is fundamental to exploring alternative damping mechanisms designed to enhance the steel column-brace support structure. One of the key design challenges is the unique dynamic behavior of LNG, especially its sloshing during earthquakes, which necessitates a comprehensive understanding of fluid-structure interaction for accurate modeling and analysis. Through a series of transient analyses incorporating actions, we evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed retrofitting measures on the structure. Our findings introduce a feasible and efficient retrofitting strategy, marked by minimal operational interrup- tion, primarily by avoiding the extensive demolition and reconstruction typically required.

Keywords

Earthquake resilience, friction dampers, LNG tank, retrofit, seismic performance, sloshing effect

References

• 1. Shekari, M. R., Khaji, N., & Ahmadi, M. T. (2010). On the seismic behavior of cylindrical base-isolated liquid storage tanks excited by long-period ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 30, 968–980. [CrossRef]
• 2. Niwa, A., & Clough, R. W. (1982). Buckling of cylindrical liquid-storage tanks under earthquake loading. Earthq Engng Struct Dyn, 10, 107–122. [CrossRef]
• 3. Shaban, N., Ozdemir, S., Caner, A., & Akyüz, U. (2017, June 15-17). Seismic retrofit of buildings with backbone dampers. In Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference—COMPDYN 2017: 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: An IACM Special
• 4. Gregoriou, V. P., Tsinopoulos, S. V., & Karabalis, D. L. (2011, May 25-28). Dynamic analysis of liquefied natural gas tanks seismically protected with energy dissipating base isolation systems. In Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference—COMPDYN 2011: 3rd International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering: An IACM Special Interest Conference, Programme, Corfu, Greece.
• 5. Jadhav, M. B., & Jangid, R. S. (2006). Response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks to near-fault motions. Struct Eng Mech, 23, 615–634. [CrossRef]
• 6. Ozbulut, O. E., Bitaraf, M., & Hurlebaus, S. (2011). Adaptive control of base-isolated structures against near-field earthquakes using variable friction dampers. Eng Struct, 33, 3143–3154. [CrossRef]
• 7. Saha, S. K., Matsagar, V. A., & Jain, A. K. (2014). Earthquake response of base-isolated liquid storage tanks for different isolator models. J Earthq Tsunami, 8, 1450013. [CrossRef]
• 8. Çerçevik, A. E., Avsar, Ö., & Hasançebi, O. (2020). Optimum design of seismic isolation systems using metaheuristic search methods. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 131, 106012. [CrossRef]
• 9. Çalım, F., Güllü, A., Soydan, C., & Yüksel, E. (2023). State-of-the-art review for lead extrusion dampers: Development, improvement, characteristics, application areas, and research needs. Structures, 58, 105477. [CrossRef]
• 10. Güllü, A., Smyrou, E., Khajehdehi, A., Ozkaynak, H., Bal, I. E., Yuksel, E., & Karadogan, F. (2019). Numerical modeling of energy dissipative steel cushions. Int J Steel Struct, 19, 13311341. [CrossRef]
• 11. Balazic, J., Guruswamy, G., Elliot, J., Pall, R. T., & Pall, A. (2011). Seismic rehabilitation of justice headquarters building. 12th WCEE 2000.
• 12. Soli, B., Baerwald, D., Krebs, P., & Pall, R. T. (2004, August 1-6). Friction Dampers for Seismic Control of Ambulatory Care Center, Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA. 13th World Conference on earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1953.
• 13. Housner GW. (1957). Dynamic pressure on accelerated fluid containers. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 47(1):15–35. [CrossRef]
• 14. Haroun, M.A., & Housner, G.W. (1981). Earthquake response of deformable liquid storage tanks. J Appl Mech, 48, 411–418. [CrossRef]
• 15. Erdik, M., Demircioglu, M., Sesetyan, K., Durukal, E., & Siyahi, B. (2004). Earthquake hazard in Marmara Region, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng, 24(8), 605631. [CrossRef]
• 16. Giardini, D., Woessner J., & Danciu L. (2014). SHARE Project: Mapping Europe's Seismic Hazard. EOS, 95(29): 261262. [CrossRef]
• 17. Caltrans. (2013). Caltrans seismic design criteria, version 1.7. California Department of Transportation.
• 18. ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE Standart, ASCE 7- 10.
• 19. Turkish Building Earthquake Code. (2018). Specification for buildings to be built in seismic areas. Ministry of Public Works and Housing, Ankara, Türkiye.
• 20. Hasanoğlu, S., Güllü, A., Dindar, A. A., Müderrisoğlu, Z., Özkaynak, H., & Bozer, A. (2024). Optimal selection and scaling of ground motion records compatible with input energy and acceleration spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 53(7), 23822404. [CrossRef]
• 21. Güllü, A. (2023). A compendious review on the determination of fundamental site period: Methods and importance. Geotechnics, 3(4), 13091323. [CrossRef]
• 22. Güllü, A., Hasanoğlu, S., & Yüksel, E. (2022). A practical methodology to estimate site fundamental periods based on the KiK‐net Borehole Velocity Profiles and its application to Istanbul. Bullet Seismol Soc Am, 112(5), 26062620. [CrossRef]
• 23. ASCE. (2013). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ASCE 41-13.