Yeni Kamu Yönetimi ve Yeni Sosyal Hareketler Teoriler Perspektifinden Türkiye’de Eğitim Yönetişimi

Year 2018, , 438 - 452, 01.04.2018

Ceray Aldemir

https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.370060

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Yeni Kamu Yönetimi (NPM) ve Yeni
Toplumsal Hareket (NSM) teorileri 1980'lerin sosyo-politik koşullarına tepki
olarak ortaya çıktı. Türkiye'de de dönemin sosyo-politik ve sosyo-ekonomik
dönüşümleri anlamak için, NPM ve NSM literatürüne birlikte odaklanmak
gerekiyor. Daha da önemlisi, NPM ve NSM çağında, eğitimin gelişim sürecini ve
önemini, Türkiye'de sosyal sermaye yaratmak için kullanılan bir araç olarak
anlamak hayati önem taşımaktadır; bu sebeple bu yazı aşağıdaki soruları
yanıtlamayı amaçlamaktadır: Seküler Türkiye'de eğitimde artan dindarlığı
açıklamak mümkün mü? NPM, eğitim yönetişiminde fırsat alanlarını nasıl açar?
NSM'ler eğitim finansmanına nasıl dahil olurlar? NSM'ler eğitim yönetişimini
nasıl yeniden tanımladı? Bu makale, Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin kuruluşundan bu
yana eğitimin tüm hükümetler için önemini göstermeye çalışacak ve eğitimin iktidarların
ideolojilerini yaygınlaştırmak için bir araç olarak kullandığına değinecektir. Çalışmada
ilk olarak 1980'ler ve 2000'ler arasındaki eğitimde gerçekleşen neoliberal
dönüşüme ve bu dönüşümde etkili olan NPM ve NSM teorilerine değinilecektir.
Çalışma eğitim ile Yeni Kamu Yönetimi ve Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler arasındaki
etkileşimi gösterecektir. 

Keywords

Eğitim Yönetişimi, Yeni Kamu Yönetimi, Dini Gruplar, Toplumsal Hareketler, Yeni Toplumsal Hareketler

Educational Governance in Turkey: From the view of New Public Management and New Social Movement Theories

Abstract

New Public Management (NPM) and  New Social Movement (NSM) emerged as a
response to socio-political conditions of the 1980s. In order to understand the
socio-political and socio-economic transformations in Turkey, it is necessary
to focus on NPM and NSM literature together. More importantly, in the age of
NPM and NSM it is vital to understand the development process of education, and
its importance as a tool which has been used to create social capital in
Turkey, since this paper aims to answer the following questions: How is it
possible to explain increasing religiosity in education in secular Turkey? How
does NPM open up opportunity spaces in the governance of education? How have
NSMs become involved in the resourcing of education? How have NSMs redefined
educational governance? This paper will attempt to show the importance of
education for all governments from the beginning of the Turkish Republic, the
Turkish governments used education as a tool for spreading their political
ideology. So there have been various implementations from secularist policies
to Islamist militarist policies in the Turkish education system. After giving
some information about educational policies, which have been shaped around
secularism, militarism and Islamism, the second section will show the
interaction between education and New Public Management (NPM). This paper will
first discuss the neoliberal changes that happened between the 1980s and 2000s,
and secondly, will indicate how NPM agendas transformed education from a social
service to the private service.

Keywords

Educational Governance, NPM, Religious Groups, Social Movements

References

• AKSOY, N., (2011), ‘Türkiye Kamu Eğitiminde Gizli Ticarileşme: Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluğun İşleyiş Biçimleri Ve Eğitimi Ticarileştirme İşlevleri’, Eğitim Bilim Toplum, Issue: 9, No: 35
• AKTAY, Y., (1997), Body, Text, Identity: The Islamist Discourse of Authenticity in Modern Turkey, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Middle East Technical University
• APPLE, W.M., (2006), Educating The ‘Right’ Way: Markets, Standards, God, and Inequality, 2nd ed., New York: Routledge, 2006.
• BALL, S.J. & Youdell, D., (2007), ‘Hidden Privatization in Public Education’, Education International 5th World Congress Preliminary Report, July, London: Institute of Education, University of London, [Electronic], [Accessed on: 25 Nov 2011], Available from: http://pages.eiie.org/quadrennialreport/2007/upload/content_trsl_images/630/Hidden_privatisation- EN.pdf
• BARY, J., Berg, E., and Chandler J., (2006), ‘Movement and Change in the Public Sector: Bringing Social Movements into the Analysis’, Public Management Review, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, pp: 433-448, [Accessed: 26th January 2012], Available from: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/14719030600853329&magic=cr ossref
• BERİS, Y. and Dicle, E. (2004) “Reforming Public Management and Managing Reform in Turkey,” in Turkey in Focus, Issue: 4, TUSIAD: Washington Office.
• BERIŞ, H. E., (2008), ‘Türkiye’de 1980 Sonrası Devlet Sermaye İlişkileri ve „Parçalı Burjuvazinin Oluşumu’, (The State-Capital Relation After 1980 and The Formation of Partial Bourgeoisie in Turkey), Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Vol: 19, No: 69, 33-45.
• BEVIR, M. and Rhodes, R. A. W., (2003), ‘Searching for Civil Society: Changing Patterns of Governance in Britain’, Public Administration, Vol: 81, No: 1, pp: 41 – 62.
• BORATAV, K., (1995), ‘Ekonomi ve Küreselleşme,’ in Isin Kansu (eds), Küreselleşme Hikayesi, Dost Yayınları.
• COHEN, J., and Arato, A., (1995), Civil Society and Political Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, 3rd ed.
• DELLA PORTA, D., & Diani, M., (1999), Social movements: An introduction, Oxford: Blackwell
• DPT, (2000), 8. Beş Yıllık Kalkınma Planı, 2001-2005, İnsan Kaynaklarının Geliştirilmesi: Eğitim, [Accessed on: 10/04/2013], available from: http://www.ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/kalkinmaplanlari
• FERLIE, E., [et. al], (1996), The New Public Management in Action, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
• GELLNER, E., (1994), Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and Its Rivals, NewYork: Penguin Press.
• GOK, F., (2003), ‘Eğitimin Özelleştirilmesi’ Neoliberalizmin Tahribatı : Türkiye’de Ekonomi, Toplum Ve Cinsiyet , Der: Balkan, N., Savran, S., Istanbul: Metis Yayınlari.
• GOLE, N., (2000), ‘Snapshots of Islamic Modernities’, Daedalus, Vol: 129, No: 1, PP: 91-117
• HOOD, C., (1991), ‘A public management for all seasons?’, Public Administration, Vol: 69, No:1, pp3-19
• HOOD, C., (1995), ‘The ‘New Public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme?’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol; 20, No:2/3, pp:93-109
• KESKIN, N., (2003), Eğitimde Reform Kamu Yönetimi I. Ulusal Kurultayı (18-19 Aral ı k 2003). İnönü Üniversitesi, Malatya.
• MELLUCI, A., (1996), Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
• MUNYAR, V., (9th April, 2012), ‘Ilköğretim öğrencisi için 1500 lira özel okul desteği versek devlete yükü azalır’, Hurriyet, http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/yazarlar/20302572.asp
• MURPHY, J., (1996), The Privatization of Schooling: Problems and Possibilities, Corwin Press, Inc. USA
• NEWMAN, J. (2001), Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.
• OECD, (2010), ‘Value for Money in Government: Public Administration after ‘New Public Management’, available from: http://www.planejamento.gov.br/secretarias/upload/Arquivos/seges/arquivos/OCDE2011/OECD_Publ ic_Management.pdf
• OZDALGA, E., (1999), Education In The Name of ‘Order and Progress’ Reflections On The Recent Eight Year Obligatory School Reform In Turkey. The Muslim World, Vol:89, pp: 414–438. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-1913.1999.tb02756.x
• SAYILAN, F., (2007), Kresellesme ve Egitimdeki Degisim, (editor: Ebru Oguz, Ayfer Yakar). Kuresellesme ve Egitim, (59-81), Ankara, Dipnot Yayinlari
• SERIM, B., (17th April, 2012), http://www.odatv.com/n.php?n=cemaat-okullarina-devlet-destegi- 1704121200
• SIMSEK, S., (2004), ‘New Social Movements in Turkey Since 1980’, Turkish Studies, Vol.5, No.2 , Summer , [Online] [Accessed: 30th January 2012], Available from: DOI: 10.1080/1468384042000228611
• SOZEN, S. ve I. Shaw, (2002), ‘The International Applicability of ‘New’ Public Management: Lessons from Turkey’, The International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 15 No. 6, s. 475- 486, 2002
• TESEV (2001), From Point of the Households the Reasons and the Proposals for Prevention of Corruption in Turkey, Istanbul, Turkish
• TOLOFARI, S., (2005), New Public Management and Education, Policy Futures in Education, Vol: 3, No: 1, pp:75-89, Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2005.3.1.11 [Accessed: 30th November 2011]
• TURAM, B., (2004), ‘The Politics of engagement between Islam and the state: ambivalences of civil society’ British Journal of Sociology, Vol: 55, No: 2, Reprinted in Shahram Akbarzadeh (ed) 2006. Islam and Globalization. Routledge
• TURAM, B., (2007), Between Islam and the State: The Politics of Engagement, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
• TURAM, B., (2011), Turkiye'de Islam ve Devlet: Demokrasi, Etkilesim, Donusum, Istanbul: Bilgi Universitesi Yayinlari
• UYSAL, A. (ed.), (2009), Siyasal İslam ve Liberalizm: Endonezya, İran, Mısır, Tunus, Türkiye, İzmir Yakın Kitabevi
• WIKTOROWICZ, Q., (2004), Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• YASAMIS, F. D. (2003). State reform in Turkey: Reasons, needs and strategies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(4), 93-107.
• YAVUZ, H., (2000), ‘Cleansing Islam from the Public Sphere’, Journal of International Affairs, Fall 2000, 54, No:1
• YAVUZ, H., (2003), Islamic Political Identity in Turkey, Oxford University Press, New York
• YAVUZ, H., (2008), Modernlesen Muslumanlar: Nurcular, Naksiler, Milli Gorus ve Ak Parti (Islamic Political Identity in Turkey), Kitap Yayinevi, Istanbul.
• YILDIRIM, H.A., (2002), Eğitimde Toplam Kalite Yönetimi, Nobel Yayınevi, Ankara.